PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness of intratissue refractive index shaping (IRIS) in living corneas and test the hypothesis that it can be enhanced by increasing the two-photon absorption (TPA) of the tissue. METHODS: Three corneas were removed from adult cats and cut into six pieces, which were placed in preservative (Optisol-GS; Bausch & Lomb, Inc., Irvine, CA) containing 0%, 0.25%, 1%, 1.5%, or 2.5% sodium fluorescein (Na-Fl). An 800-nm Ti:Sapphire femtosecond laser with a 100-fs pulse duration and 80-MHz repetition rate was used to perform IRIS in each piece, creating several refractive index (RI) modification lines at different speeds (between 0.1 and 5 mm/s). The lines were 1 mum wide, 10 microm apart, and approximately 150 microm below the tissue surface. The RI change of each grating was measured using calibrated, differential interference contrast microscopy. TUNEL staining was performed to assess whether IRIS or Na-Fl doping causes cell death. RESULTS: Scanning at 0.1 mm/s changed the RI of undoped, living corneas by 0.005. In doped corneas, RI changes between 0.01 and 0.02 were reliably achieved with higher scanning speeds. The magnitude of RI changes attained was directly proportional to Na-Fl doping concentration and inversely proportional to the scanning speed used to create the gratings. CONCLUSIONS: IRIS can be efficiently performed in living corneal tissue. Increasing the TPA of the tissue with Na-Fl increased both the scanning speeds and the magnitude of RI changes in a dose-dependent manner. Ongoing studies are exploring the use of IRIS to alter the optical properties of corneal tissue in situ, over an extended period.
PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness of intratissue refractive index shaping (IRIS) in living corneas and test the hypothesis that it can be enhanced by increasing the two-photon absorption (TPA) of the tissue. METHODS: Three corneas were removed from adult cats and cut into six pieces, which were placed in preservative (Optisol-GS; Bausch & Lomb, Inc., Irvine, CA) containing 0%, 0.25%, 1%, 1.5%, or 2.5% sodium fluorescein (Na-Fl). An 800-nm Ti:Sapphire femtosecond laser with a 100-fs pulse duration and 80-MHz repetition rate was used to perform IRIS in each piece, creating several refractive index (RI) modification lines at different speeds (between 0.1 and 5 mm/s). The lines were 1 mum wide, 10 microm apart, and approximately 150 microm below the tissue surface. The RI change of each grating was measured using calibrated, differential interference contrast microscopy. TUNEL staining was performed to assess whether IRIS or Na-Fl doping causes cell death. RESULTS: Scanning at 0.1 mm/s changed the RI of undoped, living corneas by 0.005. In doped corneas, RI changes between 0.01 and 0.02 were reliably achieved with higher scanning speeds. The magnitude of RI changes attained was directly proportional to Na-Fl doping concentration and inversely proportional to the scanning speed used to create the gratings. CONCLUSIONS: IRIS can be efficiently performed in living corneal tissue. Increasing the TPA of the tissue with Na-Fl increased both the scanning speeds and the magnitude of RI changes in a dose-dependent manner. Ongoing studies are exploring the use of IRIS to alter the optical properties of corneal tissue in situ, over an extended period.
Authors: Christian Meltendorf; Guido J Burbach; Jens Bühren; Reinhold Bug; Christian Ohrloff; Thomas Deller Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Wojciech Haske; Vincent W Chen; Joel M Hales; Wenting Dong; Stephen Barlow; Seth R Marder; Joseph W Perry Journal: Opt Express Date: 2007-03-19 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Lisen Xu; Wayne H Knox; Margaret DeMagistris; Nadan Wang; Krystel R Huxlin Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-10-17 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Daniel E Savage; Daniel R Brooks; Margaret DeMagistris; Lisen Xu; Scott MacRae; Jonathan D Ellis; Wayne H Knox; Krystel R Huxlin Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Kaitlin T Wozniak; Sara M Gearhart; Daniel E Savage; Jonathan D Ellis; Wayne H Knox; Krystel R Huxlin Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: Ruiting Huang; Dan Yu; Daniel Savage; Kaitlin Wozniak; Len Zheleznyak; Wayne H Knox; Krystel R Huxlin Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2022-03-22 Impact factor: 3.562
Authors: Kaitlin T Wozniak; Noah Elkins; Daniel R Brooks; Daniel E Savage; Scott MacRae; Jonathan D Ellis; Wayne H Knox; Krystel R Huxlin Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Roland Ackermann; Robert Kammel; Marina Merker; Andreas Kamm; Andreas Tünnermann; Stefan Nolte Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2013-01-10 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Emilio J Gualda; Javier R Vázquez de Aldana; M Carmen Martínez-García; Pablo Moreno; Juan Hernández-Toro; Luis Roso; Pablo Artal; Juan M Bueno Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 3.732