Literature DB >> 19814774

Does body position modify the results of oesophageal high resolution manometry?

S Roman1, H Damon, P E Pellissier, F Mion.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND Oesophageal motility classification using high resolution manometry (HRM) has been established in the supine position. Nevertheless, examination in the sitting position is more physiological. Our aim was to determine if body position modifies oesophago-gastric junction (OGJ) morphology and oesophageal motility. METHODS A total of 100 patients (47 males, mean age 51 years) were included in this study. The oesophageal HRM protocol included examination in supine and sitting positions. Recordings were reviewed by two different operators. Amplitude, duration, velocity, Distal Contractile Integral (DCI) and Pressurization Front Velocity of oesophageal waves induced by swallowing were recorded. KEY RESULTS The lower oesophageal sphincter resting pressure was not significantly changed by body position. The sitting position modified the OGJ classification in 12 patients. The inter-observer agreement to classify OGJ was moderate (kappa = 0.54 and 0.46, in the supine and sitting positions respectively) while it was good to diagnose motility disorders (kappa = 0.72 and 0.83). The percentage of normal waves was lower in the sitting position in comparison with the supine position (56%vs 67%, P < 0.01). The DCI was also lower in the sitting position (1125 mmHg.s.cm vs 1639, P < 0.01) as well as the amplitude of oesophageal waves. Finally the diagnosis was concordant in both positions in 72 patients. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES Body position can affect OGJ morphology and oesophageal motility assessment by HRM in some patients. Normal values in the sitting position should thus be determined. Inter-observer variation for the proposed classification of OGJ morphology must also be taken into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19814774     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01416.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  19 in total

Review 1.  Utility of Esophageal High-Resolution Manometry in Clinical Practice: First, Do HRM.

Authors:  Ishita Dhawan; Brendon O'Connell; Amit Patel; Ron Schey; Henry P Parkman; Frank Friedenberg
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  High-resolution esophageal manometry: interpretation in clinical practice.

Authors:  Rena Yadlapati
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.287

3.  Normal Values of High-Resolution Manometry in Supine and Upright Positions in a Thai Population.

Authors:  Pitichote Hiranyatheb; Suriya Chakkaphak; Supphamat Chirnaksorn; Pattaraporn Lekhaka; Kaimuk Petsrikun; Kornkanok Somboonpun
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  The effect of a sitting vs supine posture on normative esophageal pressure topography metrics and Chicago Classification diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders.

Authors:  Y Xiao; A Read; F Nicodème; S Roman; P J Kahrilas; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Identification of Quality Measures for Performance of and Interpretation of Data From Esophageal Manometry.

Authors:  Rena Yadlapati; Andrew J Gawron; Rajesh N Keswani; Karl Bilimoria; Donald O Castell; Kerry B Dunbar; Chandra P Gyawali; Blair A Jobe; Philip O Katz; David A Katzka; Brian E Lacy; Benson T Massey; Joel E Richter; Felice Schnoll-Sussman; Stuart J Spechler; Roger Tatum; Marcelo F Vela; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 11.382

6.  Optimizing the swallow protocol of clinical high-resolution esophageal manometry studies.

Authors:  Y Xiao; F Nicodème; P J Kahrilas; S Roman; Z Lin; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  High-Resolution Manometry in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Dustin A Carlson; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2015-06

Review 8.  Chicago classification version 4.0© technical review: Update on standard high-resolution manometry protocol for the assessment of esophageal motility.

Authors:  Mark R Fox; Rami Sweis; Rena Yadlapati; John Pandolfino; Albis Hani; Claudia Defilippi; Tack Jan; Nathalie Rommel
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.598

9.  Variations in Clinical Practice of Esophageal High-resolution Manometry: A Nationwide Survey.

Authors:  Eun Jeong Gong; Soo In Choi; Bong Eun Lee; Yang Won Min; Yu Kyung Cho; Kee Wook Jung; Ji Hyun Kim; Moo In Park
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.924

10.  The effects of different postures and provocative swallow materials on the normative Chicago 3.0 metrics in a healthy Asian population.

Authors:  Mohd Ridzuan Mohd Said; Zhiqin Wong; Rafiz Abdul Rani; Chai Soon Ngiu; Raja Affendi Raja Ali; Yeong Yeh Lee
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.