UNLABELLED: One third of 218 men and half of 1,576 women with low-energy distal radius fractures met the bone mineral density (BMD) criteria for osteoporosis treatment. A large proportion of patients with increased fracture risk did not have osteoporosis. Thus, all distal radius fracture patients >or=50 years should be referred to bone densitometry. INTRODUCTION: Main objectives were to determine the prevalence of patients with a low-energy distal radius fracture in need of osteoporosis treatment according to existing guidelines using T-score <or= -2.0 or <or=-2.5 standard deviation (SD) and calculate their fracture risk. METHODS: A total of 218 men and 1,576 women >or=50 years were included. BMD was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at femoral neck, total hip, and lumbar spine (L2-L4). The WHO fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX(R)) was applied to calculate the 10-year fracture risk. RESULTS: T-scores <or=-2.0 and <or=-2.5 SD at femoral neck was found in 37.7% and 19.6% of men and 51.1% and 31.2% of women, respectively. The risk of hip fracture was 6.2% for men and 9.0% for women. The corresponding figures for patients with T-score <or=-2.0 SD were 11.6% and 14.5% and for T-score <or=-2.5 SD 16.3% and 18.2%, respectively. A large proportion of distal radius fracture patients with a high 10-year FRAX risk did not have osteoporosis. CONCLUSIONS: Every second to every third fracture patient met the present BMD criteria for osteoporosis treatment. Because a large proportion of distal radius fracture patients did not have osteoporosis, treatment decisions should not be based on fracture risk assessment without bone densitometry. Thus, all distal radius fracture patients >or=50 years should be referred to bone densitometry, and if indicated, offered medical treatment.
UNLABELLED: One third of 218 men and half of 1,576 women with low-energy distal radius fractures met the bone mineral density (BMD) criteria for osteoporosis treatment. A large proportion of patients with increased fracture risk did not have osteoporosis. Thus, all distal radius fracturepatients >or=50 years should be referred to bone densitometry. INTRODUCTION: Main objectives were to determine the prevalence of patients with a low-energy distal radius fracture in need of osteoporosis treatment according to existing guidelines using T-score <or= -2.0 or <or=-2.5 standard deviation (SD) and calculate their fracture risk. METHODS: A total of 218 men and 1,576 women >or=50 years were included. BMD was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at femoral neck, total hip, and lumbar spine (L2-L4). The WHO fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX(R)) was applied to calculate the 10-year fracture risk. RESULTS: T-scores <or=-2.0 and <or=-2.5 SD at femoral neck was found in 37.7% and 19.6% of men and 51.1% and 31.2% of women, respectively. The risk of hip fracture was 6.2% for men and 9.0% for women. The corresponding figures for patients with T-score <or=-2.0 SD were 11.6% and 14.5% and for T-score <or=-2.5 SD 16.3% and 18.2%, respectively. A large proportion of distal radius fracturepatients with a high 10-year FRAX risk did not have osteoporosis. CONCLUSIONS: Every second to every third fracturepatient met the present BMD criteria for osteoporosis treatment. Because a large proportion of distal radius fracturepatients did not have osteoporosis, treatment decisions should not be based on fracture risk assessment without bone densitometry. Thus, all distal radius fracturepatients >or=50 years should be referred to bone densitometry, and if indicated, offered medical treatment.
Authors: Dennis M Black; Pierre D Delmas; Richard Eastell; Ian R Reid; Steven Boonen; Jane A Cauley; Felicia Cosman; Péter Lakatos; Ping Chung Leung; Zulema Man; Carlos Mautalen; Peter Mesenbrink; Huilin Hu; John Caminis; Karen Tong; Theresa Rosario-Jansen; Joel Krasnow; Trisha F Hue; Deborah Sellmeyer; Erik Fink Eriksen; Steven R Cummings Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-05-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: John A Kanis; Olof Johnell; Chris De Laet; Bengt Jonsson; Anders Oden; Alan K Ogelsby Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Susan V Bukata; Benedict F Digiovanni; Susan M Friedman; Harry Hoyen; Amy Kates; Stephen L Kates; Simon C Mears; Daniel A Mendelson; Fernando H Serna; Frederick E Sieber; Wakenda K Tyler Journal: Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil Date: 2011-01
Authors: R D Blank; J P Bilezikian; S L Bonnick; A J Laster; E S Leib; E M Lewiecki; P D Miller; N B Watts; N Binkley Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2010-05-13 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: D A Eekman; S H van Helden; A M Huisman; H J J Verhaar; I E M Bultink; P P Geusens; P Lips; W F Lems Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2013-09-13 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Andreas P Diamantopoulos; Gudrun Rohde; Irene Johnsrud; Inger M Skoie; Marc Hochberg; Glenn Haugeberg Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-08-24 Impact factor: 3.240