Literature DB >> 19810787

The contributions of central versus peripheral vision to scene gist recognition.

Adam M Larson1, Lester C Loschky.   

Abstract

Which region of the visual field is most useful for recognizing scene gist, central vision (the fovea and parafovea) based on its higher visual resolution and importance for object recognition, or the periphery, based on resolving lower spatial frequencies useful for scene gist recognition, and its large extent? Scenes were presented in two experimental conditions: a "Window," a circular region showing the central portion of a scene, and blocking peripheral information, or a "Scotoma," which blocks out the central portion of a scene and shows only the periphery. Results indicated the periphery was more useful than central vision for maximal performance (i.e., equal to seeing the entire image). Nevertheless, central vision was more efficient for scene gist recognition than the periphery on a per-pixel basis. A critical radius of 7.4 degrees was found where the Window and Scotoma performance curves crossed, producing equal performance. This value was compared to predicted critical radii from cortical magnification functions on the assumption that equal V1 activation would produce equal performance. However, these predictions were systematically smaller than the empirical critical radius, suggesting that the utility of central vision for gist recognition is less than predicted by V1 cortical magnification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19810787     DOI: 10.1167/9.10.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  46 in total

Review 1.  Scene Perception in the Human Brain.

Authors:  Russell A Epstein; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 6.422

Review 2.  Contributions of low- and high-level properties to neural processing of visual scenes in the human brain.

Authors:  Iris I A Groen; Edward H Silson; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  What you see is what you get: motor resonance in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Antonella Leonetti; Guglielmo Puglisi; Roma Siugzdaite; Clarissa Ferrari; Gabriella Cerri; Paola Borroni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Asymmetry in Gaze Direction Discrimination Between the Upper and Lower Visual Fields.

Authors:  Adam Palanica; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Scanpath estimation based on foveated image saliency.

Authors:  Yixiu Wang; Bin Wang; Xiaofeng Wu; Liming Zhang
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2016-10-14

6.  Mid-level visual features underlie the high-level categorical organization of the ventral stream.

Authors:  Bria Long; Chen-Ping Yu; Talia Konkle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Effects of Peripheral Eccentricity and Head Orientation on Gaze Discrimination.

Authors:  Adam Palanica; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014-01-01

8.  Functional connectivity based parcellation of early visual cortices.

Authors:  Bo-Yong Park; Kyeong-Jin Tark; Won Mok Shim; Hyunjin Park
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-12-17       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  The role of the right superior temporal gyrus in stimulus-centered spatial processing.

Authors:  Priyanka P Shah-Basak; Peii Chen; Kevin Caulfield; Jared Medina; Roy H Hamilton
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Spatial resolution of conscious visual perception in infants.

Authors:  Faraz Farzin; Susan M Rivera; David Whitney
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-09-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.