Literature DB >> 19810472

A comparison of HDR brachytherapy and IMRT techniques for dose escalation in prostate cancer: a radiobiological modeling study.

M Fatyga1, J F Williamson, N Dogan, D Todor, J V Siebers, R George, I Barani, M Hagan.   

Abstract

A course of one to three large fractions of high dose rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy is an attractive alternative to intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for delivering boost doses to the prostate in combination with additional external beam irradiation for intermediate risk disease. The purpose of this work is to quantitatively compare single-fraction HDR boosts to biologically equivalent fractionated IMRT boosts, assuming idealized image guided delivery (igIMRT) and conventional delivery (cIMRT). For nine prostate patients, both seven-field IMRT and HDR boosts were planned. The linear-quadratic model was used to compute biologically equivalent dose prescriptions. The cIMRT plan was evaluated as a static plan and with simulated random and setup errors. The authors conclude that HDR delivery produces a therapeutic ratio which is significantly better than the conventional IMRT and comparable to or better than the igIMRT delivery. For the HDR, the rectal gBEUD analysis is strongly influenced by high dose DVH tails. A saturation BED, beyond which no further injury can occur, must be assumed. Modeling of organ motion uncertainties yields mean outcomes similar to static plan outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19810472      PMCID: PMC2738740          DOI: 10.1118/1.3187224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  41 in total

1.  Determination of the urethral dose in prostate brachytherapy when the urethra cannot be visualized in the postimplant CT scan.

Authors:  F M Waterman; A P Dicker
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Generalization of a model of tissue response to radiation based on the idea of functional subunits and binomial statistics.

Authors:  P Stavrev; N Stavreva; A Niemierko; M Goitein
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  A fluence-convolution method to calculate radiation therapy dose distributions that incorporate random set-up error.

Authors:  W A Beckham; P J Keall; J V Siebers
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Optimal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: predictions for conventional external beam, IMRT, and brachytherapy from radiobiologic models.

Authors:  C R King; T A DiPetrillo; D E Wazer
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Late rectal toxicity: dose-volume effects of conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Eugene H Huang; Alan Pollack; Larry Levy; George Starkschall; Lei Dong; Isaac Rosen; Deborah A Kuban
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Direct evidence that prostate tumors show high sensitivity to fractionation (low alpha/beta ratio), similar to late-responding normal tissue.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Alvaro A Martinez; Gregory K Edmundson; Christina Mitchell; Howard D Thames; Elwood P Armour
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Dose escalation using conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy improves outcome in unfavorable prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alvaro A Martinez; Gary Gustafson; José Gonzalez; Elwood Armour; Chris Mitchell; Gregory Edmundson; William Spencer; Jannifer Stromberg; Raywin Huang; Frank Vicini
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Modeling normal tissue complication probability from repetitive computed tomography scans during fractionated high-dose-rate brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  E Dale; T P Hellebust; A Skjønsberg; T Høgberg; D R Olsen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Fitting tumor control probability models to biopsy outcome after three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy of prostate cancer: pitfalls in deducing radiobiologic parameters for tumors from clinical data.

Authors:  S Levegrün; A Jackson; M J Zelefsky; M W Skwarchuk; E S Venkatraman; W Schlegel; Z Fuks; S A Leibel; C C Ling
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  The linear-quadratic model is inappropriate to model high dose per fraction effects in radiosurgery.

Authors:  John P Kirkpatrick; Jeffrey J Meyer; Lawrence B Marks
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.934

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  High dose rate prostate brachytherapy: an overview of the rationale, experience and emerging applications in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  A Challapalli; E Jones; C Harvey; G O Hellawell; S A Mangar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Modeling of Acute Rectal Toxicity to Compare Two Patient Positioning Methods for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy: Can Toxicity Modeling be Used for Quality Assurance?

Authors:  X Liu; J Li; S E Schild; M H Schild; W Wong; S Vora; M G Herman; M Fatyga
Journal:  OMICS J Radiol       Date:  2018-12-03

3.  Dose escalation to high-risk sub-volumes based on non-invasive imaging of hypoxia and glycolytic activity in canine solid tumors: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Malene M Clausen; Anders E Hansen; Per Munck Af Rosenschold; Andreas Kjaer; Annemarie T Kristensen; Fintan J McEvoy; Svend A Engelholm
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  A Novel Framework for the Optimization of Simultaneous ThermoBrachyTherapy.

Authors:  Ioannis Androulakis; Rob M C Mestrom; Miranda E M C Christianen; Inger-Karine K Kolkman-Deurloo; Gerard C van Rhoon
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 6.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.