Literature DB >> 12459352

Late rectal toxicity: dose-volume effects of conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Eugene H Huang1, Alan Pollack, Larry Levy, George Starkschall, Lei Dong, Isaac Rosen, Deborah A Kuban.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify dosimetric, anatomic, and clinical factors that correlate with late rectal toxicity after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively analyzed the dose-volume histograms and clinical records of 163 Stage T1b-T3c prostate cancer patients treated between 1992 and 1999 with 3D-CRT, to a total isocenter dose of 74-78 Gy at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. The median follow-up was 62 months (range 24-102). All late rectal complications were scored using modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force criteria. The 6-year toxicity rate was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test. A univariate proportional hazards regression model was used to test the correlation between Grade 2 or higher toxicity and the dosimetric, anatomic, and clinical factors. In a multivariate regression model, clinical factors were added to the dosimetric and anatomic variables to determine whether they significantly altered the risk of developing late toxicity.
RESULTS: At 6 years, the rate of developing Grade 2 or higher late rectal toxicity was 25%. A significant volume effect was observed at rectal doses of 60, 70, 75.6, and 78 Gy, and the risk of developing rectal complications increased exponentially as greater volumes were irradiated. Although the percentage of rectal volume treated correlated significantly with the incidence of rectal complications at all dose levels (p <0.0001 for all comparisons), the absolute rectal volume appeared to be a factor only at the higher doses of 70, 75.6, and 78 Gy (p = 0.0514, 0.0016, and 0.0021, respectively). The following variables also correlated with toxicity on the univariate analysis: maximal dose to the clinical target volume, maximal dose to rectum, maximal dose to the rectum as a percentage of the prescribed dose, and maximal dose delivered to 10 cm(3) of the rectum. Of the clinical variables tested, only a history of hemorrhoids correlated with rectal toxicity (p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that the addition of hemorrhoids increased the risk of toxicity for each dosimetric variable found to be significant on univariate analysis (p <0.05 for all comparisons).
CONCLUSION: Dose-volume histogram analyses clearly indicated a volume effect on the probability of developing late rectal complications. Therefore, dose escalation may be safely achieved by adherence to dose-volume histogram constraints during treatment planning and organ localization at the time of treatment to ensure consistent patient setup.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12459352     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)03742-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  61 in total

Review 1.  Radiation therapy dose escalation for prostate cancer: a rationale for IMRT.

Authors:  Alan Pollack; Alex Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Steven Feigenberg; Robert G Uzzo; Robert A Price
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  21 years of biologically effective dose.

Authors:  J F Fowler
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Radiation therapy in prostate cancer: a risk-adapted strategy.

Authors:  A J Hayden; C Catton; T Pickles
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Dosimetric planning study for the prevention of anal complications after post-operative whole pelvic radiotherapy in cervical cancer patients with hemorrhoids.

Authors:  J G Baek; E C Kim; S K Kim; H Jang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  [Treatment of long-term radiation injuries in the urinary tract].

Authors:  A Kocot; H Riedmiller
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Current role of spacers for prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Michael Pinkawa
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-10

7.  Favorable outcome of intraoperative radiotherapy to the primary site in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Toshihiro Kanda; Syohei Fukuda; Naotaka Fukui; Yu Ohkubo; Tomoko Kazumoto; Yoshihiro Saito; Ayataka Ishikawa; Masafumi Kurosumi; Yukio Kageyama; Yasuhisa Fujii; Kazunori Kihara
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Impact of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy on dose-volume histograms in patients with localized prostate cancer under radical radiation therapy.

Authors:  Pilar M Samper; M Concepción López Carrizosa; Ana Pérez Casas; Carmen Vallejo; M Carmen Rubio Rodríguez; Consuelo Pérez Vara; Miguel Melchor Iñiguez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Interfractional fluctuation of rectal dose in high dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hime Ishikawa; Morio Sato; Shintaro Shirai; Kazushi Kishi; Yoshitaka Naya; Hisaki Tokunaga
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2006-11-24

10.  A comparison of acute and chronic toxicity for men with low-risk prostate cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy or (125)I permanent implant.

Authors:  Thomas N Eade; Eric M Horwitz; Karen Ruth; Mark K Buyyounouski; David J D'Ambrosio; Steven J Feigenberg; David Y T Chen; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.