Literature DB >> 19809873

Wired for her face? Male attentional bias for female faces.

Yuka Okazaki1, Arman Abrahamyan, Catherine J Stevens, Andreas A Ioannides.   

Abstract

Under conditions of inattention or deficits in orienting attention, special classes of stimuli (e.g. faces, bodies) are more likely to be perceived than other stimuli. This suggests that biologically salient visual stimuli automatically recruit attention, even when they are task-irrelevant or ignored. Here we report results from a behavioral experiment with female and male subjects and two magnetoencephalography (MEG) experiments with male subjects only, in which we investigated attentional capture with face and hand stimuli. In both the behavioral and MEG experiments, subjects were required to count the number of gender-specific targets from either face or hand categories within a block of stimuli. In the behavioral experiment, we found that male subjects were significantly more accurate in response to female than male face target blocks. There was no corresponding effect found in response to hand target blocks. Female subjects did not show a gender-based difference in response to face or hand target blocks. MEG results indicated that the male subjects' responses to face stimuli in primary visual cortex (V1) and the face-selective part of the fusiform gyrus (FG) were reduced when male face stimuli were not relevant to the task, whereas female faces maintained a strong response in these areas in both task-relevant and task-irrelevant conditions. These results suggest that within the male brain, female face stimuli are more resilient to suppression than male faces, once attention is drawn to the part of the visual field where the face appears.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19809873      PMCID: PMC2887505          DOI: 10.1007/s10548-009-0112-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Topogr        ISSN: 0896-0267            Impact factor:   3.020


  30 in total

1.  fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection.

Authors:  K M O'Craven; P E Downing; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-10-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Cognitive response profile of the human fusiform face area as determined by MEG.

Authors:  E Halgren; T Raij; K Marinkovic; V Jousmäki; R Hari
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 3.  Mathematical analysis of lead field expansions.

Authors:  J G Taylor; A A Ioannides; H W Müller-Gärtner
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Widely distributed magnetoencephalography spikes related to the planning and execution of human saccades.

Authors:  Andreas A Ioannides; Peter B C Fenwick; Lichan Liu
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Localization of individual area neuronal activity.

Authors:  N Hironaga; A A Ioannides
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  The timing of face selectivity and attentional modulation in visual processing.

Authors:  Y Okazaki; A Abrahamyan; C J Stevens; A A Ioannides
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Attention capture by faces.

Authors:  Stephen R H Langton; Anna S Law; A Mike Burton; Stefan R Schweinberger
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-09-04

8.  The human amygdala plays an important role in gaze monitoring. A PET study.

Authors:  R Kawashima; M Sugiura; T Kato; A Nakamura; K Hatano; K Ito; H Fukuda; S Kojima; K Nakamura
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Face perception is modulated by sexual preference.

Authors:  Felicitas Kranz; Alumit Ishai
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Sex differences in adults' relative visual interest in female and male faces, toys, and play styles.

Authors:  Gerianne M Alexander; Nora Charles
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2008-11-19
View more
  4 in total

1.  The characteristics of social categorization based on the unidimensional variation of gender versus age.

Authors:  Pei Wang; Qin Zhang; Yuting Liu; He Bai; Kaili Zhang
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2016-10-25

2.  Faces on Her and His Mind: Female and Likable.

Authors:  Marina A Pavlova; Annika Mayer; Franziska Hösl; Alexander N Sokolov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Sex-differences of face coding: evidence from larger right hemispheric M170 in men and dipole source modelling.

Authors:  Hannes O Tiedt; Joachim E Weber; Alfred Pauls; Klaus M Beier; Andreas Lueschow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Face-n-Food: Gender Differences in Tuning to Faces.

Authors:  Marina A Pavlova; Klaus Scheffler; Alexander N Sokolov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.