Literature DB >> 19016319

Sex differences in adults' relative visual interest in female and male faces, toys, and play styles.

Gerianne M Alexander1, Nora Charles.   

Abstract

An individual's reproductive potential appears to influence response to attractive faces of the opposite sex. Otherwise, relatively little is known about the characteristics of the adult observer that may influence his or her affective evaluation of male and female faces. An untested hypothesis (based on the proposed role of attractive faces in mate selection) is that most women would show greater interest in male faces whereas most men would show greater interest in female faces. Further, evidence from individuals with preferences for same-sex sexual partners suggests that response to attractive male and female faces may be influenced by gender-linked play preferences. To test these hypotheses, visual attention directed to sex-linked stimuli (faces, toys, play styles) was measured in 39 men and 44 women using eye tracking technology. Consistent with our predictions, men directed greater visual attention to all male-typical stimuli and visual attention to male and female faces was associated with visual attention to gender conforming or nonconforming stimuli in a manner consistent with previous research on sexual orientation. In contrast, women showed a visual preference for female-typical toys, but no visual preference for male faces or female-typical play styles. These findings indicate that sex differences in visual processing extend beyond stimuli associated with adult sexual behavior. We speculate that sex differences in visual processing are a component of the expression of gender phenotypes across the lifespan that may reflect sex differences in the motivational properties of gender-linked stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19016319     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-008-9429-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  10 in total

1.  Brain processes in women and men in response to emotive sounds.

Authors:  Paola Rigo; Nicola De Pisapia; Marc H Bornstein; Diane L Putnick; Mauro Serra; Gianluca Esposito; Paola Venuti
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.083

2.  The wandering mind of men: ERP evidence for gender differences in attention bias towards attractive opposite sex faces.

Authors:  Johanna C van Hooff; Helen Crawford; Mark van Vugt
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Wired for her face? Male attentional bias for female faces.

Authors:  Yuka Okazaki; Arman Abrahamyan; Catherine J Stevens; Andreas A Ioannides
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  The naked truth: the face and body sensitive N170 response is enhanced for nude bodies.

Authors:  Jari K Hietanen; Lauri Nummenmaa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The right touch: Stroking of CT-innervated skin promotes vocal emotion processing.

Authors:  Annett Schirmer; Thomas C Gunter
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  How relationship status and sociosexual orientation influence the link between facial attractiveness and visual attention.

Authors:  Aleksandra Mitrovic; Juergen Goller; Pablo P L Tinio; Helmut Leder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Living Up to a Name: Gender Role Behavior Varies With Forename Gender Typicality.

Authors:  Gerianne M Alexander; Kendall John; Tracy Hammond; Joanna Lahey
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-01-22

8.  Social and Object Attention Is Influenced by Biological Sex and Toy Gender-Congruence in Children With and Without Autism.

Authors:  Clare Harrop; Desiree R Jones; Noah J Sasson; Shuting Zheng; Sallie W Nowell; Julia Parish-Morris
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 5.216

9.  Sex-differences of face coding: evidence from larger right hemispheric M170 in men and dipole source modelling.

Authors:  Hannes O Tiedt; Joachim E Weber; Alfred Pauls; Klaus M Beier; Andreas Lueschow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Consequences of Beauty: Effects of Rater Sex and Sexual Orientation on the Visual Exploration and Evaluation of Attractiveness in Real World Scenes.

Authors:  Aleksandra Mitrovic; Pablo P L Tinio; Helmut Leder
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.