Literature DB >> 19809482

Understanding sickle cell carrier status identified through newborn screening: a qualitative study.

Fiona A Miller1, Martha Paynter, Robin Z Hayeems, Julian Little, June C Carroll, Brenda J Wilson, Judith Allanson, Jessica P Bytautas, Pranesh Chakraborty.   

Abstract

The expansion of newborn screening (NBS) is increasing the generation of incidental results, notably carrier results. Although carrier status is generally understood to be clinically benign, concerns persist that parents may misunderstand its meaning, with deleterious effects on children and their families. Expansion of the NBS panel in Ontario, Canada in 2006 to include sickle cell disorders drew attention to the policy challenge of incidental carrier results. We conducted a study of consumer and provider attitudes to inform policy on disclosure. In this paper, we report the results of (i) qualitative interviews with health-care providers, advocates and parents of carrier infants and (ii) focus groups with new parents and individuals active with the sickle cell community. Lay and provider participants generally believed that carrier results were clinically insignificant. However, some uncertainty persisted among lay consumers in the form of conjecture or doubt. In addition, consumers and advocates who were most informed about the disease articulated insistent yet dissonant claims of clinical significance. Meanwhile, providers referenced research knowledge to offer an equivocal assessment of the possibility and significance of clinically symptomatic carrier status. We conclude that many interpretations of carrier status are in circulation, failing to fit neatly into the categories of 'clinically significant' or 'benign.' This creates challenges for communicating clearly with parents - challenges exacerbated by inconsistent messages from screening programs regarding the significance of sickle cell carrier status. Disclosure policy related to incidentally generated infant carrier results needs to account for these complex realities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19809482      PMCID: PMC2987218          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  12 in total

1.  Consent for newborn screening: the attitudes of health care providers.

Authors:  F A Miller; R Z Hayeems; J C Carroll; B Wilson; J Little; J Allanson; J P Bytautas; M Paynter; R Christensen; P Chaktraborty
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 2.  Vulnerable child syndrome and its variants.

Authors:  M Green
Journal:  Pediatr Rev       Date:  1986-09

3.  Newborn screening for CF in a regional paediatric centre: the psychosocial effects of false-positive IRT results on parents.

Authors:  Janette Moran; Kirsten Quirk; Alistair J A Duff; Keith G Brownlee
Journal:  J Cyst Fibros       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 4.  Exercise and hemoglobin S.

Authors:  J A Kark; F T Ward
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.851

5.  The morbidity of sickle cell trait: a review of the literature.

Authors:  D A Sears
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Parental attitudes to the identification of their infants as carriers of cystic fibrosis by newborn screening.

Authors:  Sharon Lewis; Lisette Curnow; Margaret Ross; John Massie
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.954

Review 7.  Disclosing to parents newborn carrier status identified by routine blood spot screening.

Authors:  S Oliver; C Dezateux; J Kavanagh; T Lempert; R Stewart
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004-10-18

8.  Implementation of the newborn screening programme for sickle cell disease in England: results for 2003-2005.

Authors:  Allison Streetly; Mary Clarke; Melanie Downing; Lisa Farrar; Ying Foo; Kate Hall; Helena Kemp; Jane Newbold; Paul Walsh; Jenny Yates; Joan Henthorn
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.136

9.  Effect of expanded newborn screening for biochemical genetic disorders on child outcomes and parental stress.

Authors:  Susan E Waisbren; Simone Albers; Steve Amato; Mary Ampola; Thomas G Brewster; Laurie Demmer; Roger B Eaton; Robert Greenstein; Mark Korson; Cecilia Larson; Deborah Marsden; Michael Msall; Edwin W Naylor; Siegfried Pueschel; Margretta Seashore; Vivian E Shih; Harvey L Levy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Imparting carrier status results detected by universal newborn screening for sickle cell and cystic fibrosis in England: a qualitative study of current practice and policy challenges.

Authors:  Hilda Parker; Nadeem Qureshi; Fiona Ulph; Joe Kai
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  17 in total

1.  Health-care providers' views on pursuing reproductive benefit through newborn screening: the case of sickle cell disorders.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Fiona A Miller; Robin Z Hayeems; Brenda J Wilson; June C Carroll; Martha Paynter; Julian Little; Judith Allanson; Jessica P Bytautas; Pranesh Chakraborty
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Epinephrine modulates BCAM/Lu and ICAM-4 expression on the sickle cell trait red blood cell membrane.

Authors:  Jamie L Maciaszek; Biree Andemariam; Greg Huber; George Lykotrafitis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Reply to Ross' commentary: Reproductive benefit through newborn screening: preferences, policy and ethics.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Fiona A Miller
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Sickle cell carriers' unmet information needs: Beyond knowing trait status.

Authors:  Tilicia L Mayo-Gamble; David Schlundt; Jennifer Cunningham-Erves; Velma McBride Murry; Kemberlee Bonnet; Delores Quasie-Woode; Charles P Mouton
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Primary care role in expanded newborn screening: After the heel prick test.

Authors:  Robin Z Hayeems; Fiona A Miller; June C Carroll; Julian Little; Judith Allanson; Jessica P Bytautas; Pranesh Chakraborty; Brenda J Wilson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 6.  Reconsidering reproductive benefit through newborn screening: a systematic review of guidelines on preconception, prenatal and newborn screening.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Fiona A Miller; Robin Z Hayeems; Denise Avard; Bartha M Knoppers
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Factors that influence parents' experiences with results disclosure after newborn screening identifies genetic carrier status for cystic fibrosis or sickle cell hemoglobinopathy.

Authors:  Jenelle L Collins; Alison La Pean; Faith O'Tool; Kerry L Eskra; Sara J Roedl; Audrey Tluczek; Michael H Farrell
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-01-11

8.  Reproductive decisions in people with sickle cell disease or sickle cell trait.

Authors:  Agatha M Gallo; Diana Wilkie; Marie Suarez; Richard Labotka; Robert Molokie; Alexis Thompson; Patricia Hershberger; Bonnye Johnson
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 1.967

9.  Effort required to contact primary care providers after newborn screening identifies sickle cell trait.

Authors:  Stephanie A Christopher; Jenelle L Collins; Michael H Farrell
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.798

10.  Understanding and improving health education among first-time parents of infants with sickle cell anemia in Alabama: a mixed methods approach.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Lebensburger; Scott D Grosse; Jessica L Altice; JoAnn M Thierry; Nataliya V Ivankova
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.289

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.