Literature DB >> 19808309

Impact of center volume on outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation as destination therapy: analysis of the Thoratec HeartMate Registry, 1998 to 2005.

Katherine Lietz1, James W Long, Abdallah G Kfoury, Mark S Slaughter, Marc A Silver, Carmelo A Milano, Joseph G Rogers, Leslie W Miller, Mario Deng, Yoshifumi Naka, Donna Mancini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: More than 400 patients with end-stage heart failure underwent left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation of LVAD as destination therapy (DT) after the US Food and Drug Administration approval of DT in 2002. Because most of these patients had surgeries at hospitals that were newly accredited, we sought to examine the impact of LVAD center volume on the outcomes of DT. METHODS AND
RESULTS: From July 1998 through December 2005, a total of 377 patients underwent implantation of HeartMate I LVAD as DT at 68 centers in the United States. Using data from the Thoratec DT Registry, we examined the association between LVAD center volume at the time of surgery and 1-year survival with DT. Of the studied 377 DT recipients, 53% underwent device implantation at centers that performed <or=4 DT implants at the time of surgery. Center experience with DT seemed to significantly correlate with the 1-year survival (47.8% versus 67.4% in recipients of <or=4th DT versus >9th DT implant; P=0.009). However, the DT center volume was not an independent predictor of 1-year survival with DT when adjusted for the preoperative DT Risk Score, suggesting that other factors, such as improved candidate selection, may have accounted for the institutional learning curve.
CONCLUSIONS: The institutional experience with DT may have a significant impact on outcomes of this therapy. Better selection of candidates, systemic approach to surgical and postoperative care, as well as the long-term medical management most likely all contribute to these improvements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19808309     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.796128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Heart Fail        ISSN: 1941-3289            Impact factor:   8.790


  13 in total

1.  Will destination therapy be limited to large transplant centers?

Authors:  Mark S Slaughter
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2010

Review 2.  Ethical dilemmas surrounding the use of ventricular assist devices in supporting patients with end-stage organ dysfunction.

Authors:  Courtenay R Bruce; Baruch Brody; Mary A Majumder
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2013 Jan-Mar

3.  Continuous flow left ventricular assist device implant significantly improves pulmonary hypertension, right ventricular contractility, and tricuspid valve competence.

Authors:  Pavan Atluri; Alexander S Fairman; John W MacArthur; Andrew B Goldstone; Jeffrey E Cohen; Jessica L Howard; Christyna M Zalewski; Yasuhiro Shudo; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 1.620

4.  Regional differences in use and outcomes of left ventricular assist devices: Insights from the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support Registry.

Authors:  Selim R Krim; Rey P Vivo; Patrick Campbell; Jerry D Estep; Gregg C Fonarow; David C Naftel; Hector O Ventura
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 10.247

5.  Influence of Transplant Center Procedural Volume on Survival Outcomes of Heart Transplantation for Children Bridged with Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Authors:  Alex Hsieh; Dmitry Tumin; Patrick I McConnell; Mark Galantowicz; Joseph D Tobias; Don Hayes
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Institutional volume of heart transplantation with left ventricular assist device explantation influences graft survival.

Authors:  Nicholas A Haglund; Irene D Feurer; Rashid M Ahmad; Thomas G DiSalvo; Daniel J Lenihan; Mary E Keebler; Kelly H Schlendorf; John M Stulak; Mark A Wigger; Simon Maltais
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 10.247

7.  Trends in the use and outcomes of ventricular assist devices among medicare beneficiaries, 2006 through 2011.

Authors:  Prateeti Khazanie; Bradley G Hammill; Chetan B Patel; Zubin J Eapen; Eric D Peterson; Joseph G Rogers; Carmelo A Milano; Lesley H Curtis; Adrian F Hernandez
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  In vitro testing of a novel blood pump designed for temporary extracorporeal support.

Authors:  David J Spurlock; David N Ranney; Emilia M Fracz; Daniel E Mazur; R H Bartlet; Jonathan W Haft
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 9.  Left ventricular assist device patient selection: do risk scores help?

Authors:  Ashwin K Ravichandran; Jennifer Cowger
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Hospital costs fell as numbers of LVADs were increasing: experiences from Oslo University Hospital.

Authors:  Vinod Mishra; Arnt E Fiane; Odd Geiran; Gro Sørensen; Ishtiaq Khushi; Terje P Hagen
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 1.637

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.