Literature DB >> 23518898

Ethical dilemmas surrounding the use of ventricular assist devices in supporting patients with end-stage organ dysfunction.

Courtenay R Bruce1, Baruch Brody, Mary A Majumder.   

Abstract

Successful practice of cardiovascular medicine requires familiarity with the complex ethical issues that accompany therapeutic innovation and diffusion. Even as technologies transition from experimental to standard care, challenges remain. Mechanical circulatory support devices, for instance, are increasingly conceptualized as conventional therapies. Despite this, or perhaps because of it, the ethical issues surrounding the use of these devices in patients with end-stage organ dysfunction are becoming increasingly apparent. In this paper, we provide an introduction to ethical considerations related to the use of ventricular assist devices (VADs) in end-stage organ failure, focusing on three stages or decision points: initiation, continued use, and deactivation. Our goal is not to exhaustively resolve these dilemmas but to illustrate how ethical considerations relate to decision making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioethics; ethics; left ventricular assist devices; mechanical circulatory support

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23518898      PMCID: PMC3600878          DOI: 10.14797/mdcj-9-1-11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J        ISSN: 1947-6108


  37 in total

1.  Withdrawing very low-burden interventions in chronically ill patients.

Authors:  J A Rhymes; L B McCullough; R J Luchi; T A Teasdale; N Wilson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure.

Authors:  E A Rose; A C Gelijns; A J Moskowitz; D F Heitjan; L W Stevenson; W Dembitsky; J W Long; D D Ascheim; A R Tierney; R G Levitan; J T Watson; P Meier; N S Ronan; P A Shapiro; R M Lazar; L W Miller; L Gupta; O H Frazier; P Desvigne-Nickens; M C Oz; V L Poirier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Is it ethical to withdraw low-burden interventions in chronically ill patients?

Authors:  D J Lane
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-09-20       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Predictors of quality of life at 1 month after implantation of a left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Kathleen L Grady; Peter Meyer; Annette Mattea; Diane Dressler; Sophia Ormaza; Connie White-Williams; Suzanne Chillcott; Annemarie Kaan; Barbara Todd; Alice Loo; Annette L Klemme; William Piccione; Maria Rosa Costanzo
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 5.  Ethical challenges with deactivation of durable mechanical circulatory support at the end of life: left ventricular assist devices and total artificial hearts.

Authors:  Mohamed Y Rady; Joseph L Verheijde
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 3.510

6.  Withdrawal of ventricular assist device support.

Authors:  Jane MacIver; Heather J Ross
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.250

7.  The REMATCH trial: rationale, design, and end points. Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure.

Authors:  E A Rose; A J Moskowitz; M Packer; J A Sollano; D L Williams; A R Tierney; D F Heitjan; P Meier; D D Ascheim; R G Levitan; A D Weinberg; L W Stevenson; P A Shapiro; R M Lazar; J T Watson; D J Goldstein; A C Gelijns
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Depression in the context of disability and the "right to die".

Authors:  Carol J Gill
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2004

9.  Quality of life outcomes after heart transplantation in individuals bridged to transplant with ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  M A Dew; R L Kormos; S Winowich; R C Harris; E A Stanford; L Carozza; B P Griffith
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 10.247

10.  Change in quality of life from after left ventricular assist device implantation to after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Kathleen L Grady; Peter M Meyer; Diane Dressler; Connie White-Williams; Annemarie Kaan; Annette Mattea; Sophia Ormaza; Suzanne Chillcott; Alice Loo; Barbara Todd; Maria Rosa Costanzo; William Piccione
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 10.247

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Ventricular assist devices as destination therapy: psychosocial and ethical implications.

Authors:  Sherry Grogan; Kristin Kostick; Estevan Delgado; Courtenay R Bruce
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

Review 2.  Ethical challenges of deactivation of cardiac devices in advanced heart failure.

Authors:  Hassan Chamsi-Pasha; Mohammed A Chamsi-Pasha; Mohammed Ali Albar
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2014-06

Review 3.  How New Support Devices Change Critical Care Delivery.

Authors:  Asma Zainab; Divina Tuazon; Faisal Uddin; Iqbal Ratnani
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

4.  Patients' decision making process and expectations of a left ventricular assist device pre and post implantation.

Authors:  Lisa A Kitko; Judith E Hupcey; Barbara Birriel; Windy Alonso
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.210

Review 5.  Left ventricular assist devices: a kidney's perspective.

Authors:  T R Tromp; N de Jonge; J A Joles
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.214

6.  Matters to address prior to introducing new life support technology in Japan: three serious ethical concerns related to the use of left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy and suggested policies to deal with them.

Authors:  Atsushi Asai; Sakiko Masaki; Taketoshi Okita; Aya Enzo; Yasuhiro Kadooka
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.652

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.