Prateeti Khazanie1, Bradley G Hammill2, Chetan B Patel1, Zubin J Eapen1, Eric D Peterson1, Joseph G Rogers1, Carmelo A Milano1, Lesley H Curtis1, Adrian F Hernandez3. 1. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina. 2. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina. 3. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: adrian.hernandez@duke.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine trends in mortality, readmission, and costs among Medicare beneficiaries receiving ventricular assist devices (VADs) and associations between hospital-level procedure volume and outcomes. BACKGROUND: VADs are an option for patients with advanced heart failure, but temporal changes in outcomes and associations between facility-level volume and outcomes are poorly understood. METHODS: This is a population-based, retrospective cohort study of all fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with heart failure who received an implantable VAD between 2006 and 2011. We used Cox proportional hazards models to examine temporal changes in mortality, readmission, and hospital-level procedure volume. RESULTS: Among 2,507 patients who received a VAD at 103 centers during the study period, the in-hospital mortality decreased from 30% to 10% (p < 0.001), the 1-year mortality decreased from 42% to 26% (p < 0.001), and the all-cause readmission was frequent (82% and 81%; p = 0.70). After covariate adjustment, in-hospital and 1-year mortality decreased (p < 0.001 for both), but the all-cause readmission did not change (p = 0.82). Hospitals with a low procedure volume had higher risks of in-hospital mortality (risk ratio: 1.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.28 to 2.33) and 1-year mortality (risk ratio: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.24 to 1.93) than high-volume hospitals. Procedure volume was not associated with risk of readmission. The greatest cost was from the index hospitalization and remained unchanged ($204,020 in 2006 and $201,026 in 2011; p = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: Short- and long-term mortality after VAD implantation among Medicare beneficiaries improved, but readmission remained similar over time. A higher volume of VAD implants was associated with lower risk of mortality but not readmission. Costs to Medicare have not changed in recent years.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine trends in mortality, readmission, and costs among Medicare beneficiaries receiving ventricular assist devices (VADs) and associations between hospital-level procedure volume and outcomes. BACKGROUND: VADs are an option for patients with advanced heart failure, but temporal changes in outcomes and associations between facility-level volume and outcomes are poorly understood. METHODS: This is a population-based, retrospective cohort study of all fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with heart failure who received an implantable VAD between 2006 and 2011. We used Cox proportional hazards models to examine temporal changes in mortality, readmission, and hospital-level procedure volume. RESULTS: Among 2,507 patients who received a VAD at 103 centers during the study period, the in-hospital mortality decreased from 30% to 10% (p < 0.001), the 1-year mortality decreased from 42% to 26% (p < 0.001), and the all-cause readmission was frequent (82% and 81%; p = 0.70). After covariate adjustment, in-hospital and 1-year mortality decreased (p < 0.001 for both), but the all-cause readmission did not change (p = 0.82). Hospitals with a low procedure volume had higher risks of in-hospital mortality (risk ratio: 1.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.28 to 2.33) and 1-year mortality (risk ratio: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.24 to 1.93) than high-volume hospitals. Procedure volume was not associated with risk of readmission. The greatest cost was from the index hospitalization and remained unchanged ($204,020 in 2006 and $201,026 in 2011; p = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: Short- and long-term mortality after VAD implantation among Medicare beneficiaries improved, but readmission remained similar over time. A higher volume of VAD implants was associated with lower risk of mortality but not readmission. Costs to Medicare have not changed in recent years.
Authors: E A Rose; A C Gelijns; A J Moskowitz; D F Heitjan; L W Stevenson; W Dembitsky; J W Long; D D Ascheim; A R Tierney; R G Levitan; J T Watson; P Meier; N S Ronan; P A Shapiro; R M Lazar; L W Miller; L Gupta; O H Frazier; P Desvigne-Nickens; M C Oz; V L Poirier Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-11-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Elena Birman-Deych; Amy D Waterman; Yan Yan; David S Nilasena; Martha J Radford; Brian F Gage Journal: Med Care Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Leslie W Miller; Francis D Pagani; Stuart D Russell; Ranjit John; Andrew J Boyle; Keith D Aaronson; John V Conte; Yoshifumi Naka; Donna Mancini; Reynolds M Delgado; Thomas E MacGillivray; David J Farrar; O H Frazier Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-08-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Rachel J Gordon; Alan D Weinberg; Francis D Pagani; Mark S Slaughter; Pat S Pappas; Yoshifumi Naka; Daniel J Goldstein; Walter P Dembitsky; Julie C Giacalone; Jennifer Ferrante; Deborah D Ascheim; Alan J Moskowitz; Eric A Rose; Annetine C Gelijns; Franklin D Lowy Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-01-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Alexander E Merkler; Monica L Chen; Neal S Parikh; Santosh B Murthy; Shadi Yaghi; Parag Goyal; Peter M Okin; Maria G Karas; Babak B Navi; Costantino Iadecola; Hooman Kamel Journal: Stroke Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Emelia J Benjamin; Michael J Blaha; Stephanie E Chiuve; Mary Cushman; Sandeep R Das; Rajat Deo; Sarah D de Ferranti; James Floyd; Myriam Fornage; Cathleen Gillespie; Carmen R Isasi; Monik C Jiménez; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Suzanne E Judd; Daniel Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Chris T Longenecker; Rachel H Mackey; Kunihiro Matsushita; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Robert W Neumar; Latha Palaniappan; Dilip K Pandey; Ravi R Thiagarajan; Mathew J Reeves; Matthew Ritchey; Carlos J Rodriguez; Gregory A Roth; Wayne D Rosamond; Comilla Sasson; Amytis Towfighi; Connie W Tsao; Melanie B Turner; Salim S Virani; Jenifer H Voeks; Joshua Z Willey; John T Wilkins; Jason Hy Wu; Heather M Alger; Sally S Wong; Paul Muntner Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Qixing Liang; Sarah Ward; Francis D Pagani; Shashank S Sinha; Min Zhang; Robert Kormos; Keith D Aaronson; Andrew D Althouse; James K Kirklin; David Naftel; Donald S Likosky Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2017-12-19 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Michael P Thompson; Francis D Pagani; Qixing Liang; Lynze R Franko; Min Zhang; Jeffrey S McCullough; Raymond J Strobel; Keith D Aaronson; Robert L Kormos; Donald S Likosky Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Prateeti Khazanie; Bradley G Hammill; Chetan B Patel; Michael S Kiernan; Lauren B Cooper; Suzanne V Arnold; Timothy J Fendler; John A Spertus; Lesley H Curtis; Adrian F Hernandez Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2016-02-15 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Shannon M Dunlay; Jacob J Strand; Sara E Wordingham; John M Stulak; Angela J Luckhardt; Keith M Swetz Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 8.790