Literature DB >> 19806409

Preoperative nomogram to predict risk of perioperative mortality following pancreatic resections for malignancy.

Chandrakanth Are1, Chantal Afuh, Lavanya Ravipati, Aaron Sasson, Fred Ullrich, Lynette Smith.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The majority of pancreatic resections for malignancy are performed in older patients with major comorbidities. The aim of this study was to develop a preoperative nomogram based on the presence of comorbidities to predict risk of perioperative mortality.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database was queried to identify patients that underwent pancreatectomy for malignancy. The preoperative comorbidities identified as predictors were used, and a nomogram was created. Sample A (2000-2004) was utilized to develop the model, and sample B (2005) was utilized to validate this model.
RESULTS: The overall actual observed perioperative mortality rate for samples A and B was 6.3% and 5.2%, respectively. The mean total points calculated for sample A by the nomogram was 131.7 that translates to a nomogram-predicted mortality rate of 4.9%, which is similar to the actual mortality. The mean total points for sample B was 128.1, which translates to a nomogram-predicted mortality rate of 4.6%. The similarity of mortality rates as predicted by the nomogram and a concordance index of 0.76 shows good agreement between the data and the nomogram.
CONCLUSION: This preoperative nomogram has been shown to accurately predict the risk of perioperative mortality following pancreatectomy for malignancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19806409     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-009-1051-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  24 in total

1.  1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: A single-institution experience.

Authors:  Jordan M Winter; John L Cameron; Kurtis A Campbell; Meghan A Arnold; David C Chang; Joann Coleman; Mary B Hodgin; Patricia K Sauter; Ralph H Hruban; Taylor S Riall; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti; Keith D Lillemoe; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies.

Authors:  John L Cameron; Taylor S Riall; JoAnn Coleman; Kenneth A Belcher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Postoperative nomogram for 12-year sarcoma-specific death.

Authors:  Michael W Kattan; Denis H Y Leung; Murray F Brennan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  An outcome study of breast reconstruction: presurgical identification of risk factors for complications.

Authors:  K Y Lin; F R Johns; J Gibson; M Long; D B Drake; M M Moore
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Postoperative nomogram for disease-specific survival after an R0 resection for gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Michael W Kattan; Martin S Karpeh; Madhu Mazumdar; Murray F Brennan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Preoperative prediction of the occurrence and severity of complications after esophagectomy for cancer with use of a nomogram.

Authors:  Sjoerd M Lagarde; Johannes B Reitsma; Anna-Karin D Maris; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Olivier R C Busch; Hugo Obertop; Aelko H Zwinderman; J Jan B van Lanschot
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Management and outcomes of postpancreatectomy fistula, leak, and abscess: results of 908 patients resected at a single institution between 2000 and 2005.

Authors:  Yael Vin; Camelia S Sima; George I Getrajdman; Karen T Brown; Anne Covey; Murray F Brennan; Peter J Allen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 9.  Operative mortality after hepatic resection: are literature-based rates broadly applicable?

Authors:  Bolanle Asiyanbola; David Chang; Ana Luiza Gleisner; Hari Nathan; Michael A Choti; Richard D Schulick; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Relation of perioperative deaths to hospital volume among patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy.

Authors:  M D Lieberman; H Kilburn; M Lindsey; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  25 in total

1.  Pancreatectomy risk calculator: an ACS-NSQIP resource.

Authors:  Purvi Parikh; Mira Shiloach; Mark E Cohen; Karl Y Bilimoria; Clifford Y Ko; Bruce L Hall; Henry A Pitt
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Comparison of observed to predicted outcomes using the ACS NSQIP risk calculator in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Harveshp D Mogal; Nora Fino; Clancy Clark; Perry Shen
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  External assessment of the Early Mortality Risk Score in patients with adenocarcinoma undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Gaëtan-Romain Joliat; David Petermann; Nicolas Demartines; Markus Schäfer
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  The Relationship Between Age and Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients Undergoing Pancreatic Resection.

Authors:  Derrick Antoniak; Chandrakanth Are; Chad Vokoun; Kaeli Samson; Lynette Smith; Jason Shiffermiller
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  A preoperative nomogram to predict the risk of perioperative mortality following gastric resections for malignancy.

Authors:  Mashaal Dhir; Lynette M Smith; Fred Ullrich; Premila D Leiphrakpam; Quan P Ly; Aaron R Sasson; Chandrakanth Are
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Evaluating the ACS NSQIP Risk Calculator in Primary Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor: Results from the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group.

Authors:  Apeksha Dave; Eliza W Beal; Alexandra G Lopez-Aguiar; George Poultsides; Eleftherios Makris; Flavio G Rocha; Zaheer Kanji; Sean Ronnekleiv-Kelly; Victoria R Rendell; Ryan C Fields; Bradley A Krasnick; Kamran Idrees; Paula Marincola Smith; Hari Nathan; Megan Beems; Shishir K Maithel; Timothy M Pawlik; Carl R Schmidt; Mary E Dillhoff
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Benign Tumors of the Pancreas-Radical Surgery Versus Parenchyma-Sparing Local Resection-the Challenge Facing Surgeons.

Authors:  Hans G Beger
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Factors Predictive of Reoperation After Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Bradley R Hall; Richard Sleightholm; Lynette Smith; Harlan Sayles; Chandrakanth Are
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-03-25

9.  Whipple-specific complications result in prolonged length of stay not accounted for in ACS-NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator.

Authors:  Brian M Cusworth; Bradley A Krasnick; Timothy M Nywening; Cheryl A Woolsey; Ryan C Fields; Maria M Doyle; Jingxia Liu; William G Hawkins
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 10.  [Surgical treatment of benign, premalignant and low-risk tumors of the pancreas : Standard resection or parenchyma preserving, local extirpation].

Authors:  H G Beger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.