BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The optimal radiochemotherapy regimen for advanced head-and-neck cancer is still debated. This nonrandomized study compares two cisplatin-based radiochemotherapy regimens in 128 patients with locally advanced unresectable stage IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of either two courses cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)/d1-5 + 29-33; n = 54) or two courses cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)/d1-5 + 29-33) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; 600 mg/m(2)/d1-5 + 29-33; n = 74). RESULTS: At least one grade 3 toxicity occurred in 25 of 54 patients (46%) receiving cisplatin alone and in 52 of 74 patients (70%) receiving cisplatin + 5-FU. The latter regimen was particularly associated with increased rates of mucositis (p = 0.027) and acute skin toxicity (p = 0.001). Seven of 54 (13%) and 20 of 74 patients (27%) received only one chemotherapy course due to treatment-related acute toxicity. Late toxicity in terms of xerostomia, neck fibrosis, skin toxicity, and lymphedema was not significantly different. The 2-year locoregional control rates were 67% after cisplatin alone and 52% after cisplatin + 5-FU (p = 0.35). The metastases-free survival rates were 79% and 69%, respectively (p = 0.65), and the overall survival rates 70% and 51%, respectively (p = 0.10). On multivariate analysis, outcome was significantly associated with performance status, T-category, N-category, hemoglobin level prior to radiotherapy, and radiotherapy break > 1 week. CONCLUSION: Two courses of fractionated cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)/day) alone appear preferable, as this regimen resulted in similar outcome and late toxicity as two courses of cisplatin + 5-FU, but in significantly less acute toxicity.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The optimal radiochemotherapy regimen for advanced head-and-neck cancer is still debated. This nonrandomized study compares two cisplatin-based radiochemotherapy regimens in 128 patients with locally advanced unresectable stage IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of either two courses cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)/d1-5 + 29-33; n = 54) or two courses cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)/d1-5 + 29-33) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; 600 mg/m(2)/d1-5 + 29-33; n = 74). RESULTS: At least one grade 3 toxicity occurred in 25 of 54 patients (46%) receiving cisplatin alone and in 52 of 74 patients (70%) receiving cisplatin + 5-FU. The latter regimen was particularly associated with increased rates of mucositis (p = 0.027) and acute skin toxicity (p = 0.001). Seven of 54 (13%) and 20 of 74 patients (27%) received only one chemotherapy course due to treatment-related acute toxicity. Late toxicity in terms of xerostomia, neck fibrosis, skin toxicity, and lymphedema was not significantly different. The 2-year locoregional control rates were 67% after cisplatin alone and 52% after cisplatin + 5-FU (p = 0.35). The metastases-free survival rates were 79% and 69%, respectively (p = 0.65), and the overall survival rates 70% and 51%, respectively (p = 0.10). On multivariate analysis, outcome was significantly associated with performance status, T-category, N-category, hemoglobin level prior to radiotherapy, and radiotherapy break > 1 week. CONCLUSION: Two courses of fractionated cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)/day) alone appear preferable, as this regimen resulted in similar outcome and late toxicity as two courses of cisplatin + 5-FU, but in significantly less acute toxicity.
Authors: G Calais; M Alfonsi; E Bardet; C Sire; T Germain; P Bergerot; B Rhein; J Tortochaux; P Oudinot; P Bertrand Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1999-12-15 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: V A Marcial; T F Pajak; M Mohiuddin; J S Cooper; M al Sarraf; P A Mowry; W Curran; J Crissman; M Rodríguez; E Vélez-García Journal: Cancer Date: 1990-11-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: A Becker; P Stadler; R S Lavey; G Hänsgen; T Kuhnt; C Lautenschläger; H J Feldmann; M Molls; J Dunst Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2000-01-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: C Robertson; A G Robertson; J H Hendry; S A Roberts; N J Slevin; W B Duncan; R H MacDougall; G R Kerr; B O'Sullivan; T J Keane Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1998-01-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Mia Voordeckers; Hendrik Everaert; Koen Tournel; Dirk Verellen; Ilan Baron; Gretel Van Esch; Chris Vanhove; Guy Storme Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: S A Leibel; C B Scott; M Mohiuddin; V A Marcial; L R Coia; L W Davis; Z Fuks Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1991-08 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Dirk Rades; Nina D Seibold; Maximilian P Gebhard; Frank Noack; Steven E Schild; Christoph Thorns Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2011-09-19 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Hendrik Andreas Wolff; Jan Bosch; Klaus Jung; Tobias Overbeck; Steffen Hennies; Christoph Matthias; Clemens F Hess; Ralph M Roedel; Hans Christiansen Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2010-04-26 Impact factor: 3.621