Jennifer C Ho1, Jack Phan2. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Unit 97, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Unit 97, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. jphan@mdanderson.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Skull base reirradiation is challenging due to complex anatomy, enrichment of treatment-resistant clonogens, and increased risk of severe treatment complications. Without local therapy, early mortality is certain and tumor progression can result in debilitating symptoms. Modern radiotherapy advancements, such as image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), particle therapy, and stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT), are attractive for skull base reirradiation. RECENT FINDINGS: Although limited by their retrospective nature and heterogeneous patient populations, several studies have demonstrated that reirradiation with these highly conformal techniques is feasible. Compared to IMRT or particle therapy reirradiation, SRT reirradiation appears promising with lower toxicity and increased convenience. Here, we provide thorough explanations for each technology and summarize the most relevant and recent studies, with particular attention to efficacy and toxicity. Skull base reirradiation using these extremely conformal therapy techniques requires meticulous treatment planning and should be delivered by experienced teams.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Skull base reirradiation is challenging due to complex anatomy, enrichment of treatment-resistant clonogens, and increased risk of severe treatment complications. Without local therapy, early mortality is certain and tumor progression can result in debilitating symptoms. Modern radiotherapy advancements, such as image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), particle therapy, and stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT), are attractive for skull base reirradiation. RECENT FINDINGS: Although limited by their retrospective nature and heterogeneous patient populations, several studies have demonstrated that reirradiation with these highly conformal techniques is feasible. Compared to IMRT or particle therapy reirradiation, SRT reirradiation appears promising with lower toxicity and increased convenience. Here, we provide thorough explanations for each technology and summarize the most relevant and recent studies, with particular attention to efficacy and toxicity. Skull base reirradiation using these extremely conformal therapy techniques requires meticulous treatment planning and should be delivered by experienced teams.
Entities:
Keywords:
Head and neck cancer; Proton therapy; Radiosurgery; Reirradiation; Skull base; Stereotactic
Authors: Robert Timmerman; Rebecca Paulus; James Galvin; Jeffrey Michalski; William Straube; Jeffrey Bradley; Achilles Fakiris; Andrea Bezjak; Gregory Videtic; David Johnstone; Jack Fowler; Elizabeth Gore; Hak Choy Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Alexandra D Jensen; Melanie Poulakis; Anna V Nikoghosyan; Naved Chaudhri; Matthias Uhl; Marc W Münter; Klaus K Herfarth; Jürgen Debus Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: A A Forastiere; B Metch; D E Schuller; J F Ensley; L F Hutchins; P Triozzi; J A Kish; S McClure; E VonFeldt; S K Williamson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1992-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Joe Y Chang; Suresh Senan; Marinus A Paul; Reza J Mehran; Alexander V Louie; Peter Balter; Harry J M Groen; Stephen E McRae; Joachim Widder; Lei Feng; Ben E E M van den Borne; Mark F Munsell; Coen Hurkmans; Donald A Berry; Erik van Werkhoven; John J Kresl; Anne-Marie Dingemans; Omar Dawood; Cornelis J A Haasbeek; Larry S Carpenter; Katrien De Jaeger; Ritsuko Komaki; Ben J Slotman; Egbert F Smit; Jack A Roth Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2015-05-13 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Nadeem Riaz; Julian C Hong; Eric J Sherman; Luc Morris; Matthew Fury; Ian Ganly; Tony J C Wang; Weji Shi; Suzanne L Wolden; Andrew Jackson; Richard J Wong; Zhigang Zhang; Shyam D Rao; Nancy Y Lee Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2014-06-30 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: C Jacobs; G Lyman; E Velez-García; K S Sridhar; W Knight; H Hochster; L T Goodnough; J E Mortimer; L H Einhorn; L Schacter Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1992-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Corey J Langer; Jonathan Harris; Eric M Horwitz; Nicos Nicolaou; Merrill Kies; Walter Curran; Stuart Wong; Kian Ang Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-10-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Dawn Owen; Fawaad Iqbal; Bruce E Pollock; Michael J Link; Kathy Stien; Yolanda I Garces; Paul D Brown; Robert L Foote Journal: Head Neck Date: 2014-08-01 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: He Wang; Congjun Wang; Samuel Tung; Andrew Wilson Dimmitt; Pei Fong Wong; Mark A Edson; Adam S Garden; David I Rosenthal; Clifton D Fuller; Gary B Gunn; Vinita Takiar; Xin A Wang; Dershan Luo; James N Yang; Jennifer Wong; Jack Phan Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2016-05-08 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Linton T Evans; Franco DeMonte; David R Grosshans; Amol J Ghia; Ahmed Habib; Shaan M Raza Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2019-02-21