Literature DB >> 19016016

Prediction of distant metastasis in head neck cancer patients: implications for induction chemotherapy and pre-treatment staging?

Gabriela Studer1, Burkhardt Seifert, Christoph Glanzmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) combined treatment approaches, surgical and radiodiagnostic advances, respectively, lead to improved local-regional control in head neck cancer (HNC). With increasing local-regional control, distant metastases (DM) become more meaningful. In some trials without concomitant chemotherapy, induction chemotherapy (IC) resulted in an absolute reduction of DM by ~10-15%. In order to define a more efficient selection of patients at risk for DM with respect to IC and M-staging, we analysed our patients treated by contemporary standards. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1/2002 to 12/2007, 409 HNC patients were treated with IMRT; 303/409 (74%) underwent definitive, 106 (26%) postoperative IMRT. The mean/median follow-up was 23/20 months (3-72). 70% tolerated 4-7, 9% 1-3 cycles of simultaneous cisplatin. Treatment followed a prospectively designed protocol. In a previous study with 172 HNC IMRT patients, gross tumor volume (GTV) was found the strongest predictor for local-regional control. In the current study, this criterion has been prospectively tested for DM. Numbers needed to treat were calculated for IC.
RESULTS: DM developed in 28/399 (7%) patients; 10 presented initially with DM (total 38/409). In 13/28 (46%), DM remained the only manifestation of disease. GTV was the strongest predictor for DM (p < 0.0001) of all tested. Only 4% of patients with GTV < 70 cc developed DM, vs. 25% (18/73) with > 70 cc; only 6 of them (6/73, 8%) developed isolated DM.
CONCLUSION: GTV was the most significant predictor for DM, that could guide selective pre-treatment M-staging. The subgroup with isolated DM in the high risk group, that could benefit from IC, is small.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19016016     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-008-1951-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  11 in total

1.  Survival of patients with head and neck cancer. Impact of physical status and comorbidities.

Authors:  F Sadat; A Wienke; J Dunst; T Kuhnt
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Cystatin C - a fast and reliable biomarker for glomerular filtration rate in head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Edwin Bölke; Gisela Schieren; Stephan Gripp; Gerald Steinbach; Matthias Peiper; Klaus Orth; Christiane Matuschek; Maximilian Pelzer; Guido Lammering; Ruud Houben; Christina Antke; Lars Christian Rump; Rodrigo Mota; Peter Arne Gerber; Patrick Schuler; Thomas K Hoffmann; Ethelyn Rusnak; Derik Hermsen; Wilfried Budach
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Taxane-containing induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy. Outcome in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Authors:  J O Brömme; M Schmücking; A Arnold; R Giger; D Rauch; D Leiser; L Plasswilm; A Geretschläger; P Ghadjar; D M Aebersold
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Adjuvant low single dose cisplatin-based concurrent radiochemotherapy of oral cavity and oropharynx carcinoma: impact of extracapsular nodal spread on distant metastases.

Authors:  Thomas Kuhnt; Ulf Klockenbrink; Stephan Knipping; Juergen Lautermann; Karen Kriese; Andreas Wienke; Guido Hildebrandt; Steffen Hauptmann
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Importance of tumor volume in supraglottic and glottic laryngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  L W van Bockel; E M Monninkhof; F A Pameijer; C H J Terhaard
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Radiochemotherapy including cisplatin alone versus cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil for locally advanced unresectable stage IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  Silke Tribius; Stefanie Kronemann; Yasemin Kilic; Ursula Schroeder; Samer Hakim; Steven E Schild; Dirk Rades
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Impact of tumor volume and systemic therapy on outcome in patients undergoing IMRT for large volume head neck cancer.

Authors:  Gabriela Studer; Tamara Rordorf; Christoph Glanzmann
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Volumetric stratification of cT4 stage head and neck cancer.

Authors:  G Studer; C Glanzmann
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 9.  The role of tumor volume in radiotherapy of patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Tomasz Rutkowski
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Palliative radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer after failure of induction chemotherapy: comparison of two fractionation schemes.

Authors:  Kailash Chandra Pandey; Swaroop Revannasiddaiah; Nirdosh Kumar Pant; Vipul Nautiyal; Madhup Rastogi; Manoj Kumar Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2013-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.