Literature DB >> 19805125

Colloquium papers: Adaptive landscapes and protein evolution.

Maurício Carneiro1, Daniel L Hartl.   

Abstract

The principles governing protein evolution under strong selection are important because of the recent history of evolved resistance to insecticides, antibiotics, and vaccines. One experimental approach focuses on studies of mutant proteins and all combinations of mutant sites that could possibly be intermediates in the evolutionary pathway to resistance. In organisms carrying each of the engineered proteins, a measure of protein function or a proxy for fitness is estimated. The correspondence between protein sequence and fitness is widely known as a fitness landscape or adaptive landscape. Here, we examine some empirical fitness landscapes and compare them with simulated landscapes in which the fitnesses are randomly assigned. We find that mutant sites in real proteins show significantly more additivity than those obtained from random simulations. The high degree of additivity is reflected in a summary statistic for adaptive landscapes known as the "roughness," which for the actual proteins so far examined lies in the smallest 0.5% tail of random landscapes.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19805125      PMCID: PMC2868285          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0906192106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  17 in total

Review 1.  The genetic theory of adaptation: a brief history.

Authors:  H Allen Orr
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Properties of adaptive walks on uncorrelated landscapes under strong selection and weak mutation.

Authors:  Darin R Rokyta; Craig J Beisel; Paul Joyce
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Empirical fitness landscapes reveal accessible evolutionary paths.

Authors:  Frank J Poelwijk; Daniel J Kiviet; Daniel M Weinreich; Sander J Tans
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Evolution in Mendelian Populations.

Authors:  S Wright
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1931-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Percolation on fitness landscapes: effects of correlation, phenotype, and incompatibilities.

Authors:  Janko Gravner; Damien Pitman; Sergey Gavrilets
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Rate of adaptive peak shifts with partial genetic robustness.

Authors:  Yuseob Kim
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Natural selection and the concept of a protein space.

Authors:  J M Smith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-02-07       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  A cross-section of the fitness landscape of dihydrofolate reductase.

Authors:  T Aita; M Iwakura; Y Husimi
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  2001-09

9.  The biochemical architecture of an ancient adaptive landscape.

Authors:  Mark Lunzer; Stephen P Miller; Roderick Felsheim; Antony M Dean
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Global view of bionetwork dynamics: adaptive landscape.

Authors:  Ping Ao
Journal:  J Genet Genomics       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.275

View more
  54 in total

1.  Fitness conferred by replaced amino acids declines with time.

Authors:  Sergey A Naumenko; Alexey S Kondrashov; Georgii A Bazykin
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Reverse evolution leads to genotypic incompatibility despite functional and active site convergence.

Authors:  Miriam Kaltenbach; Colin J Jackson; Eleanor C Campbell; Florian Hollfelder; Nobuhiko Tokuriki
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 3.  Experimental approaches to evaluate the contributions of candidate protein-coding mutations to phenotypic evolution.

Authors:  Jay F Storz; Anthony J Zera
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2011

4.  Evolution in health and medicine Sackler colloquium: Evolutionary perspectives on health and medicine.

Authors:  Stephen C Stearns; Randolph M Nesse; Diddahally R Govindaraju; Peter T Ellison
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Multiple adaptive substitutions during evolution in novel environments.

Authors:  Kavita Jain; Sarada Seetharaman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Quantitative Description of a Protein Fitness Landscape Based on Molecular Features.

Authors:  María-Rocío Meini; Pablo E Tomatis; Daniel M Weinreich; Alejandro J Vila
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Long-term evolution on complex fitness landscapes when mutation is weak.

Authors:  David M McCandlish
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Escape from Adaptive Conflict follows from weak functional trade-offs and mutational robustness.

Authors:  Tobias Sikosek; Hue Sun Chan; Erich Bornberg-Bauer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Predictability of evolution depends nonmonotonically on population size.

Authors:  Ivan G Szendro; Jasper Franke; J Arjan G M de Visser; Joachim Krug
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The peaks and geometry of fitness landscapes.

Authors:  Kristina Crona; Devin Greene; Miriam Barlow
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 2.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.