Literature DB >> 16796767

Explicit information interferes with implicit motor learning of both continuous and discrete movement tasks after stroke.

Lara Boyd1, Carolee Winstein.   

Abstract

A large portion of the rehabilitation experience after stroke relies on implicit learning. However, our understanding of how best to facilitate motor learning after stroke is limited by a paucity of research that has explored the interaction between explicit information and implicit learning across various task domains. Previously we reported that the delivery of explicit instructions disrupted implicit motor learning after stroke that involved the sensorimotor cortical areas or basal ganglia. The purpose of this study was to determine the robustness of these findings by determining whether they could be replicated with 2 motor tasks, one discrete and one continuous, employed by the same group of participants. Ten individuals with stroke in the sensorimotor cortical areas (SMC), 10 with stroke in the basal ganglia (BG), and 10 age-matched healthy controls (HC) participated in this study. Each completed 3 days of practice of both a discrete implicit motor task (the serial reaction time task) and a continuous motor task (the continuous tracking task); all returned on a fourth day for retention tests. By random designation, participants were divided into either the explicit information (EI) or no explicit information (No-EI) groups. Consistent with previous results, we found that the response to explicit information after stroke was uniformly negative regardless of task or lesion location; both stroke groups demonstrated an interference effect of explicit information while the healthy control group did not. Strengthening these findings is the fact that the interference effect of explicit information was not task dependent. This point is particularly important for rehabilitation scientists as they instruct clients during various therapeutic tasks after stroke. Our data suggest that certain forms of explicit information delivered before task practice may not be as useful for learning as discovering the solution to the motor task with practice alone, and this is regardless of the type of task being learned.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16796767     DOI: 10.1097/01.npt.0000282566.48050.9b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther        ISSN: 1557-0576            Impact factor:   3.649


  52 in total

1.  Implicit sequence-specific motor learning after subcortical stroke is associated with increased prefrontal brain activations: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Sean K Meehan; Bubblepreet Randhawa; Brenda Wessel; Lara A Boyd
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Implicit probabilistic sequence learning is independent of explicit awareness.

Authors:  Sunbin Song; James H Howard; Darlene V Howard
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Comparing Differences in ADL Outcomes for the STOMP Intervention for Dementia in the Natural Home Environment Versus a Clinic Environment.

Authors:  C A Ciro; J L Poole; B Skipper; L A Hershey
Journal:  Austin Alzheimers Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2014-09-04

4.  White matter microstructural correlates of superior long-term skill gained implicitly under randomized practice.

Authors:  Sunbin Song; Nikhil Sharma; Ethan R Buch; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 5.  Cognitive impairment in acquired brain injury: a predictor of rehabilitation outcomes and an opportunity for novel interventions.

Authors:  Ellen Whyte; Elizabeth Skidmore; Howard Aizenstein; Joseph Ricker; Meryl Butters
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.298

6.  Evidence for parallel explicit and implicit sequence learning systems in older adults.

Authors:  Sunbin Song; Brynn Marks; James H Howard; Darlene V Howard
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Implicit and explicit learning in individuals with agrammatic aphasia.

Authors:  Julia Schuchard; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2014-06

Review 8.  Sensorimotor training in virtual reality: a review.

Authors:  Sergei V Adamovich; Gerard G Fluet; Eugene Tunik; Alma S Merians
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.138

Review 9.  Technology-assisted training of arm-hand skills in stroke: concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design.

Authors:  Annick A A Timmermans; Henk A M Seelen; Richard D Willmann; Herman Kingma
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Preserved motor learning after stroke is related to the degree of proprioceptive deficit.

Authors:  Eric D Vidoni; Lara A Boyd
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.