Literature DB >> 19798637

Differential effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over ipsilesional primary motor cortex in cortical and subcortical middle cerebral artery stroke.

Mitra Ameli1, Christian Grefkes, Friederike Kemper, Florian P Riegg, Anne K Rehme, Hans Karbe, Gereon R Fink, Dennis A Nowak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Facilitation of cortical excitability of the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) may improve dexterity of the affected hand after stroke. The effects of 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over ipsilesional M1 on movement kinematics and neural activity were examined in patients with subcortical or cortical stroke.
METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with impaired dexterity after stroke (16 subcortical middle cerebral artery [MCA] strokes, 13 MCA strokes involving subcortical tissue and primary or secondary cortical sensorimotor areas) received 1 session of 10 Hz rTMS (5-second stimulation, 25-second break, 1,000 pulses, 80% of the resting motor threshold) applied over: 1) ipsilesional M1 and 2) vertex (control stimulation). For behavioral testing, 29 patients performed index finger and hand tapping movements with the affected and unaffected hand prior to and following each rTMS application. For functional magnetic resonance imaging, 18 patients performed index finger tapping movements with the affected and unaffected hand before and after each rTMS application.
RESULTS: Ten-Hz rTMS over ipsilesional M1, but not over vertex, improved movement kinematics in 14 of 16 patients with subcortical stroke, but not in patients with additional cortical stroke. Ten-Hz rTMS slightly deteriorated dexterity of the affected hand in 7 of 13 cortical stroke patients. At a neural level, rTMS over ipsilesional M1 reduced neural activity of the contralesional M1 in 11 patients with subcortical stroke, but caused a widespread bilateral recruitment of primary and secondary motor areas in 7 patients with cortical stroke. Activity in ipsilesional M1 at baseline correlated with improvement of index finger tapping frequency induced by rTMS.
INTERPRETATION: The beneficial effects of 10 Hz rTMS over ipsilesional M1 on motor function of the affected hand depend on the extension of MCA stroke. Neural activity in ipsilesional M1 may serve as a surrogate marker for the effectiveness of facilitatory rTMS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19798637     DOI: 10.1002/ana.21725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Neurol        ISSN: 0364-5134            Impact factor:   10.422


  80 in total

1.  [Structural and functional neuroimaging of the pathophysiology of apraxia].

Authors:  P H Weiss; G R Fink
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 2.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the prediction and enhancement of rehabilitation treatment effects.

Authors:  Michelle Harris-Love
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.649

3.  The effects of five sessions of continuous theta burst stimulation over contralesional sensorimotor cortex paired with paretic skilled motor practice in people with chronic stroke.

Authors:  J L Neva; K E Brown; K P Wadden; C S Mang; M R Borich; S K Meehan; L A Boyd
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  Anatomy and physiology predict response to motor cortex stimulation after stroke.

Authors:  Sarvenaz Nouri; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Convergence of human brain mapping tools: neuronavigated TMS parameters and fMRI activity in the hand motor area.

Authors:  Anna-Sophia Sarfeld; Svenja Diekhoff; Ling E Wang; Gianpiero Liuzzi; Kamil Uludağ; Simon B Eickhoff; Gereon R Fink; Christian Grefkes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  Noninvasive brain stimulation in neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Marco Sandrini; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2013

Review 7.  Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: a novel model for neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Pino; Giovanni Pellegrino; Giovanni Assenza; Fioravante Capone; Florinda Ferreri; Domenico Formica; Federico Ranieri; Mario Tombini; Ulf Ziemann; John C Rothwell; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 42.937

8.  Combined rTMS and virtual reality brain-computer interface training for motor recovery after stroke.

Authors:  N N Johnson; J Carey; B J Edelman; A Doud; A Grande; K Lakshminarayan; B He
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Modulating cortical connectivity in stroke patients by rTMS assessed with fMRI and dynamic causal modeling.

Authors:  Christian Grefkes; Dennis A Nowak; Ling E Wang; Manuel Dafotakis; Simon B Eickhoff; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Enhanced motor function and its neurophysiological correlates after navigated low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the contralesional motor cortex in stroke.

Authors:  Shahid Bashir; Marine Vernet; Umer Najib; Jennifer Perez; Miguel Alonso-Alonso; Mark Knobel; Woo-Kyoung Yoo; Dylan Edwards; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.406

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.