Literature DB >> 19798488

Impossible is nothing: 5:3 and 4:3 multi-frequency bimanual coordination.

Attila J Kovacs1, John J Buchanan, Charles H Shea.   

Abstract

The present findings demonstrate that when participants are provided a Lissajous display with cursor indicating the position of the limbs and a template illustrating the desired movement pattern they can rapidly (10 min) and effectively (continuous relative phase errors and variability ~10 degrees ) tune in a difficult 5:3 bimanual coordination pattern and without additional practice re-tune their responding to an equally difficult 4:3 coordination pattern. The findings indicate the extreme difficulty associated with producing complex polyrhythms in previous experiments has been due to split attention when Lissajous feedback has been provided and inability of the participant to detect and correct coordination errors when only provided vision of the limbs. Effective transfer to the 4:3 polyrhythm without previous practice suggests that the perception-action system's capabilities are extensive. The present findings when viewed in the context of recent experiments using similar protocols suggest that much, but not all, of the difficulty associated with producing a variety of bimanual coordination tasks should be viewed in terms of perceptual constraints imposed by the testing environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19798488     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-2031-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  45 in total

1.  Dynamics of 1:2 Coordination: Sources of Symmetry Breaking.

Authors:  Dagmar Sternad; M. T. Turvey; Elliot L. Saltzman
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination.

Authors:  F Mechsner; D Kerzel; G Knoblich; W Prinz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Perceptual and attentional influences on continuous 2:1 and 3:2 multi-frequency bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Attila J Kovacs; John J Buchanan; Charles H Shea
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Plane of motion mediates the coalition of constraints in rhythmic bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Robin Salesse; Olivier Oullier; Jean-Jacques Temprado
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Unraveling interlimb interactions underlying bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Arne Ridderikhoff; C Lieke E Peper; Peter J Beek
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Multifrequency behavioral patterns and the phase attractive circle map.

Authors:  G C deGuzman; J A Kelso
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  Bimanual coordination during rhythmic movements in the absence of somatosensory feedback.

Authors:  Rebecca M C Spencer; Richard B Ivry; Daniel Cattaert; Andras Semjen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-07-13       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Human movement coordination implicates relative direction as the information for relative phase.

Authors:  Andrew D Wilson; David R Collins; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-14       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Bimanual circling in deafferented patients: evidence for a role of visual forward models.

Authors:  Franz Mechsner; Prisca Stenneken; Jonathan Cole; Gisa Aschersleben; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  J Neuropsychol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.864

10.  Can people tap concurrent bimanual rhythms independently?

Authors:  S T Klapp; J M Nelson; R J Jagacinski
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.328

View more
  42 in total

1.  Bimanual Fitts' tasks: Kelso, Southard, and Goodman, 1979 revisited.

Authors:  Charles H Shea; Jason Boyle; Attila J Kovacs
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Vision-to-event and movement-to-event coordination in an unimanual circling task.

Authors:  Sandra Dietrich; Wolfgang Prinz; Martina Rieger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Adaptation to novel visuo-motor transformations: further evidence of functional haptic neglect.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Katrin Rapp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Observational practice benefits are limited to perceptual improvements in the acquisition of a novel coordination skill.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Nicola J Hodges; Olav E Krigolson; Todd C Handy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Perception and action influences on discrete and reciprocal bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Charles H Shea; John J Buchanan; Deanna M Kennedy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

6.  Amplitude differences, spatial assimilation, and integrated feedback in bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Attila J Kovacs; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Bimanual force control: cooperation and interference?

Authors:  Deanna M Kennedy; Jason B Boyle; Chaoyi Wang; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-12-07

8.  Robust retention of individual sensorimotor skill after self-guided practice.

Authors:  Se-Woong Park; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Effects of integrated feedback on discrete bimanual movements in choice reaction time.

Authors:  Jarrod Blinch; Guilherme de Cellio Martins; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Optimizing the control of high-ID movements: rethinking the power of the visual display.

Authors:  Jason B Boyle; Stefan Panzer; Chaoyi Wang; Deanna Kennedy; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.