Literature DB >> 19797565

Epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: trends, readmissions, and subsequent knee surgery.

Stephen Lyman1, Panagiotis Koulouvaris, Seth Sherman, Huong Do, Lisa A Mandl, Robert G Marx.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is widely accepted as the treatment of choice for individuals with functional instability due to anterior cruciate deficiency. There remains little information on the epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with regard to adverse outcomes such as hospital readmission and subsequent knee surgery. We sought to identify the frequency of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, the rates of subsequent operations and readmissions, and potential predictors of these outcomes.
METHODS: The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database, a census of all hospital admissions and ambulatory surgery in New York State, was used to identify anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions performed between 1997 and 2006. Patients with concomitant pathological conditions of the knee were included. The patients were tracked for hospital readmission within ninety days after the surgery and for subsequent surgery on either knee within one year. The risks of these outcomes were modeled with use of age, sex, comorbidity, hospital and surgeon volume, and inpatient or outpatient surgery as potential risk factors.
RESULTS: We identified 70,547 anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions, with an increase from 6178 in 1997 to 7507 in 2006. Readmission within ninety days after the surgery was infrequent (a 2.3% rate), but subsequent surgery on either knee within one year was much more common (a 6.5% rate). Patients were at increased risk for readmission within ninety days if they were over forty years of age, sicker (e.g., had a preexisting comorbidity), male, and operated on by a lower-volume surgeon. Predictors of subsequent knee surgery included being female, having concomitant knee surgery, and being operated on by a lower-volume surgeon. Predictors of a subsequent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction included an age of less than forty years, concomitant meniscectomy or other knee surgery, and surgery in a lower-volume hospital.
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has increased in frequency. Also, while anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction appears to be a safe procedure, the risk of a subsequent operation on either knee is increased among younger patients and those treated by a lower-volume surgeon or at a lower-volume hospital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19797565     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  139 in total

1.  Predictors for additional anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: data from the Swedish national ACL register.

Authors:  Anne Fältström; Martin Hägglund; Henrik Magnusson; Magnus Forssblad; Joanna Kvist
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Monitoring surgical performance: an application of industrial quality process control to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  David J Biau; Philippe Landreau; Nicolas Graveleau; Nicolas Gravelau
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Remnant-preserving and re-tensioning technique to cover the graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Jung Ho Noh; Hee Soo Kyung; Young Hak Roh; Tae Seok Kang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  The Impact of the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Research on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Orthopaedic Practice.

Authors:  T Sean Lynch; Richard D Parker; Ronak M Patel; Jack T Andrish; Kurt P Spindler; Annunziata Amendola; Robert H Brophy; Warren R Dunn; David C Flanigan; Laura J Huston; Morgan H Jones; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert G Marx; Matthew J Matava; Eric C McCarty; Angela D Pedroza; Emily K Reinke; Brian R Wolf; Rick W Wright
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Societal and economic impact of anterior cruciate ligament tears.

Authors:  Richard C Mather; Lane Koenig; Mininder S Kocher; Timothy M Dall; Paul Gallo; Daniel J Scott; Bernard R Bach; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Effect of ACL reconstruction graft size on simulated Lachman testing: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Robert W Westermann; Brian R Wolf; Jacob M Elkins
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2013

7.  Is the femoral lateral condyle's bone morphology the trochlea of the ACL?

Authors:  Margarida Sá Fernandes; Rogério Pereira; Renato Andrade; Sebastiano Vasta; Hélder Pereira; João Páscoa Pinheiro; João Espregueira-Mendes
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Epidemiology of multiligament knee reconstruction.

Authors:  Sean M Wilson; Nabil Mehta; Huong T Do; Hassan Ghomrawi; Stephen Lyman; Robert G Marx
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Atopic dermatitis is a novel demographic risk factor for surgical site infection after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Manabu Kawata; Yusuke Sasabuchi; Shuji Taketomi; Hiroshi Inui; Hiroki Matsui; Kiyohide Fushimi; Hideo Yasunaga; Sakae Tanaka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Regional mechanical properties of human patellar tendon allografts.

Authors:  Adam Yanke; Rebecca Bell; Andrew Lee; Elizabeth F Shewman; Vincent Wang; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.