Literature DB >> 19797411

Hawley retainers full- or part-time? A randomized clinical trial.

M Shawesh1, B Bhatti, T Usmani, N Mandall.   

Abstract

The aim of this trial was to compare two different orthodontic retention regimens: is night-only wear of upper and lower Hawley retainers for 1 year as effective as 6 months full-time followed by 6 months night-only wear? Sixty-seven consecutive patients attending for orthodontic debond were randomly allocated to wear upper and lower Hawley retainers either for 1 year night-only (group 1) or for 6 months full-time followed by 6 months night-only (group 2). In group 1, 41.2 per cent were males and 58.8 per cent were females and their mean age was 15.6 years [standard deviation (SD) 1.6 years]. In group 2, 24.2 per cent were males and 75.8 per cent were females and their mean age was 15.8 years (SD 1.2 years). Study models were taken at the start (T0) and end (T1) of treatment and 1 year post-debond (T2). Digital callipers were used to measure upper and lower labial segment irregularity using Little's index and upper and lower labial segment crowding. To evaluate differences between groups 1 and 2 t-tests were used. There were no statistically significant differences between the two retention regimens at T2 for labial segment irregularity or crowding (P > 0.05). Since both retention regimens were equally effective during the 1 year retention period, it would seem clinically acceptable to ask patients to wear their retainers at night only.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19797411     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjp082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  16 in total

1.  A multicentre audit of GDPs knowledge of orthodontic retention.

Authors:  S Kotecha; S Gale; L Khamashta-Ledezma; J Scott; M Seedat; M Storey; A Ulhaq; J Scholey
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 2.  Retention in orthodontics.

Authors:  C D Johnston; S J Littlewood
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Evaluation of relapse with thermoplastic retainers equipped with microsensors.

Authors:  Sait İshakoğlu; Serpil Çokakoğlu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 2.684

4.  Assessment of Factors Affecting Adolescent Patients' Compliance with Hawley and Vacuum Formed Retainers.

Authors:  Behnam Mirzakouchaki; Sajjad Shirazi; Reza Sharghi; Samaneh Shirazi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-06-01

5.  Comparison of Two Retention Appliances with Respect to Clinical Effectiveness.

Authors:  Yeşim Kaya; Murat Tunca; Sıddık Keskin
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2019-06-01

6.  A retrospective randomized double-blind comparison study of the effectiveness of Hawley vs vacuum-formed retainers.

Authors:  Stephen Barlin; Roland Smith; Ray Reed; Jonathan Sandy; Anthony John Ireland
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Survey on Retention Protocols Among Turkish Orthodontists.

Authors:  Aylin Paşaoğlu; Işıl Aras; Ali Mert; Aynur Aras
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2016-09-01

8.  Anterior tooth alignment: A comparison of orthodontic retention regimens 5 years posttreatment.

Authors:  Ragnar Bjering; Kari Birkeland; Vaska Vandevska-Radunovic
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 9.  Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces.

Authors:  Simon J Littlewood; Declan T Millett; Bridget Doubleday; David R Bearn; Helen V Worthington
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-29

10.  Effects of wear time recording on the patient's compliance.

Authors:  Alexander Pauls; Manuel Nienkemper; Agamemnon Panayotidis; Benedict Wilmes; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.