Literature DB >> 19797199

Impact of scanning density on measurements from spectral domain optical coherence tomography.

Srinivas R Sadda1, Pearse A Keane, Yanling Ouyang, Jared F Updike, Alexander C Walsh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between B-scan density and retinal thickness measurements obtained by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) in eyes with retinal disease.
METHODS: Data were collected from 115 patients who underwent volume OCT imaging with Cirrus HD-OCT using the 512 x 128 horizontal raster protocol. Raw OCT data, including the location of the automated retinal boundaries, were exported from the Cirrus HD-OCT instrument and imported into the Doheny Image Reading Center (DIRC) OCT viewing and grading software, termed "3D-OCTOR." For each case, retinal thickness maps similar to those produced by Cirrus HD-OCT were generated using all 128 B-scans, as well as using less dense subsets of scans, ranging from every other scan to every 16th scan. Retinal thickness measurements derived using only a subset of scans were compared to measurements using all 128 B-scans, and differences for the foveal central subfield (FCS) and total macular volume were computed.
RESULTS: The mean error in FCS retinal thickness measurement increased as the density of B-scans decreased, but the error was small (<2 microm), except at the sparsest densities evaluated. The maximum error at a density of every fourth scan (32 scans spaced 188 microm apart) was <1%.
CONCLUSIONS: B-scan density in volume SDOCT acquisitions can be reduced to 32 horizontal B-scans (spaced 188 microm apart) with minimal change in calculated retinal thickness measurements. This information may be of value in design of scanning protocols for SDOCT for use in future clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19797199      PMCID: PMC2868472          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-4325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  32 in total

1.  Tracking optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  R Daniel Ferguson; Daniel X Hammer; Lelia Adelina Paunescu; Siobahn Beaton; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 3.776

Review 2.  Recent developments in optical coherence tomography for imaging the retina.

Authors:  Mirjam E J van Velthoven; Dirk J Faber; Frank D Verbraak; Ton G van Leeuwen; Marc D de Smet
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 21.198

3.  Quality of the threshold algorithm in age-related macular degeneration: Stratus versus Cirrus OCT.

Authors:  Ilse Krebs; Christiane Falkner-Radler; Stefan Hagen; Paulina Haas; Werner Brannath; Shilla Lie; Siamak Ansari-Shahrezaei; Susanne Binder
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Fundus based eye tracker for optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Louisa Pui Sum Ip; Truong Q Nguyen; Dirk-Uwe Bartsch
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2004

5.  Optical coherence tomography measurements and analysis methods in optical coherence tomography studies of diabetic macular edema.

Authors:  David J Browning; Adam R Glassman; Lloyd P Aiello; Neil M Bressler; Susan B Bressler; Ronald P Danis; Matthew D Davis; Frederick L Ferris; Suber S Huang; Peter K Kaiser; Craig Kollman; Srinavas Sadda; Ingrid U Scott; Haijing Qin
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 6.  State-of-the-art retinal optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Wolfgang Drexler; James G Fujimoto
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2007-08-11       Impact factor: 21.198

7.  Evaluation of ranibizumab-induced changes in high-resolution optical coherence tomographic retinal morphology and their impact on visual function.

Authors:  Christopher G Kiss; Wolfgang Geitzenauer; Christian Simader; Giovanni Gregori; Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Relationship between optical coherence tomography retinal parameters and visual acuity in neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Pearse A Keane; Sandra Liakopoulos; Karen T Chang; Mingwu Wang; Laurie Dustin; Alexander C Walsh; Srinivas R Sadda
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Relationships between clinical measures of visual function, fluorescein angiographic and optical coherence tomography features in patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation.

Authors:  T Moutray; M Alarbi; G Mahon; M Stevenson; U Chakravarthy
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Macular thickness measurements in normal eyes using spectral domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  John E Legarreta; Giovanni Gregori; Omar S Punjabi; Robert W Knighton; Geeta A Lalwani; Carmen A Puliafito
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug
View more
  23 in total

1.  Spatial distribution of posterior pole choroidal thickness by spectral domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Yanling Ouyang; Florian M Heussen; Nils Mokwa; Alexander C Walsh; Mary K Durbin; Pearse A Keane; P James Sanchez; Humberto Ruiz-Garcia; Srinivas R Sadda
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Interchangeability of macular thickness measurements between different volumetric protocols of Spectralis optical coherence tomography in normal eyes.

Authors:  Yaroslava Wenner; Stephan Wismann; Melanie Jäger; Jörn Pons-Kühnemann; Birgit Lorenz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Outer retinal structure after closed-globe blunt ocular trauma.

Authors:  John A Flatter; Robert F Cooper; Michael J Dubow; Alexander Pinhas; Ravi S Singh; Rashmi Kapur; Nishit Shah; Ryan D Walsh; Sang H Hong; David V Weinberg; Kimberly E Stepien; William J Wirostko; Scott Robison; Alfredo Dubra; Richard B Rosen; Thomas B Connor; Joseph Carroll
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 4.  [Quality assurance of optical coherence tomography for diagnostics of the fundus : Positional statement of the BVA, DOG and RG].

Authors: 
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Lateral and axial measurement differences between spectral-domain optical coherence tomography systems.

Authors:  Francisco A Folgar; Eric L Yuan; Sina Farsiu; Cynthia A Toth
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.170

6.  Simple estimation of clinically relevant lesion volumes using spectral domain-optical coherence tomography in neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Florian M Heussen; Yanling Ouyang; Srinivas R Sadda; Alexander C Walsh
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Effect of OCT volume scan density on thickness measurements in diabetic macular edema.

Authors:  M G Nittala; R Konduru; H Ruiz-Garcia; S R Sadda
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  ASSOCIATION OF DRUSEN VOLUME WITH CHOROIDAL PARAMETERS IN NONNEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION.

Authors:  Siva Balasubramanian; Jianqin Lei; Muneeswar G Nittala; Swetha B Velaga; Jonathan Haines; Margaret A Pericak-Vance; Dwight Stambolian; SriniVas R Sadda
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.256

9.  Morphometric spectral-domain optical coherence tomography features of epiretinal membrane correlate with visual acuity in patients with uveitis.

Authors:  Hossein Nazari; Laurie Dustin; Florian M Heussen; Srinivas Sadda; Narsing A Rao
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Factors associated with macular thickness in the COMET myopic cohort.

Authors:  Elise Harb; Leslie Hyman; Melissa Fazzari; Jane Gwiazda; Wendy Marsh-Tootle
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.