Literature DB >> 21760625

Effect of OCT volume scan density on thickness measurements in diabetic macular edema.

M G Nittala1, R Konduru, H Ruiz-Garcia, S R Sadda.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of reducing B-scan frame-sampling density on retinal thickness measurements using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME).
METHODS: We retrospectively collected OCT data for 64 eyes of 43 patients undergoing imaging for DME using the Cirrus HD-OCT 512 × 128 macular cube protocol. For each case, raw OCT data were imported into the 3D-OCTOR software, and retinal thickness maps were generated using all 128 B-scans and for lower densities of B-scans ranging from every other scan to only four scans (every 30-s B-scan). Maps were generated before and after manual correction of retinal boundary segmentation errors. The foveal central subfield (FCS) and total macular volume (TMV) values were used to compare thickness maps of varying densities.
RESULTS: The mean difference in FCS retinal thickness and TMV increased as the B-scan density was reduced, particularly when the density was reduced to fewer than 16 B-scans over 6 mm. At a density of 16 B-scans, the mean absolute difference in FCS thickness was 2.43 μm (0.79%), with a maximum of 10.1 μm (4.09%). At this density, the mean difference in TMV was 0.012 mm(3) (0.13%), with a maximum difference of 0.04 mm(3) (0.47%). Manual correction of OCT segmentation errors resulted in a difference in FCS thickness of ≥ 10 μm in only 12.5% of cases, with a maximum difference of 115.7 μm.
CONCLUSION: A minimum of 16 equally spaced B-scans appear necessary to generate retinal thickness measurements similar to those produced using all 128 B-scans in eyes with DME. Manual correction of segmentation errors appeared to have a clinically meaningful effect in a small minority of cases. These results may have implications for the design of SD-OCT imaging and grading protocols in clinical trials of DME, particularly when using multiple SD-OCT instruments that acquire varying numbers of B-scans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21760625      PMCID: PMC3194325          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2011.173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  17 in total

1.  Use of optical coherence tomography to assess variations in macular retinal thickness in myopia.

Authors:  Marcus C C Lim; Sek-Tien Hoh; Paul J Foster; Tock-Han Lim; Sek-Jin Chew; Steve K L Seah; Tin Aung
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Error correction and quantitative subanalysis of optical coherence tomography data using computer-assisted grading.

Authors:  Srinivas R Sadda; Sandra Joeres; Ziqiang Wu; Paul Updike; Peggy Romano; Allyson T Collins; Alexander C Walsh
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Segmentation error in Stratus optical coherence tomography for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Praveen J Patel; Fred K Chen; Lyndon da Cruz; Adnan Tufail
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Retinal thickness study with optical coherence tomography in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Hortensia Sánchez-Tocino; Aurora Alvarez-Vidal; Miguel J Maldonado; Javier Moreno-Montañés; Alfredo García-Layana
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Effect of macular edema on optical coherence tomography signal strength.

Authors:  Hamid Hosseini; Mohammad Reza Razeghinejad; Sarah Nowroozizadeh; Peyman Jafari; Hossein Ashraf
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Errors in retinal thickness measurements obtained by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Srinivas R Sadda; Ziqiang Wu; Alexander C Walsh; Len Richine; Jessica Dougall; Richard Cortez; Laurie D LaBree
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Alignment artifacts in optical coherence tomography analyzed images.

Authors:  Christopher Kai-shun Leung; Wai-Man Chan; Kelvin Kam-Lung Chong; Kwok-Cheung Chan; Wing-ho Yung; Moon-Kong Tsang; Raymond Kwok Kay Tse; Dennis Shun-chiu Lam
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Reproducibility of quantitative optical coherence tomography subanalysis in neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Sandra Joeres; Jerry W Tsong; Paul G Updike; Allyson T Collins; Laurie Dustin; Alexander C Walsh; Peggy W Romano; SriniVas R Sadda
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Automatic segmentation in three-dimensional analysis of fibrovascular pigmentepithelial detachment using high-definition optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  C Ahlers; C Simader; W Geitzenauer; G Stock; P Stetson; S Dastmalchi; U Schmidt-Erfurth
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Macular thickness measurements in normal eyes using spectral domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  John E Legarreta; Giovanni Gregori; Omar S Punjabi; Robert W Knighton; Geeta A Lalwani; Carmen A Puliafito
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  [Quality assurance of optical coherence tomography for diagnostics of the fundus : Positional statement of the BVA, DOG and RG].

Authors: 
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Wide-Field Megahertz OCT Imaging of Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy.

Authors:  Lukas Reznicek; Jan P Kolb; Thomas Klein; Kathrin J Mohler; Wolfgang Wieser; Robert Huber; Marcus Kernt; Josef Märtz; Aljoscha S Neubauer
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 4.011

3.  Correlation between retinal sensitivity and cystoid space characteristics in diabetic macular edema.

Authors:  Swetha B Velaga; Muneeswar G Nittala; B Parinitha; S R Sadda; Jay Kumar Chhablani
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Impact of optical coherence tomography scanning density on quantitative analyses in neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  S B Velaga; M G Nittala; R K Konduru; F Heussen; P A Keane; S R Sadda
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 3.775

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.