Leora I Horwitz1, Jeremy Green, Elizabeth H Bradley. 1. Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Section of General Internal Medicine, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. leora.horwitz@yale.edu
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Prolonged emergency department (ED) wait time and length of visit reduce quality of care and increase adverse events. Previous studies have not examined hospital-level performance on ED wait time and visit length in the United States. The purpose of this study is to describe hospital-level performance on ED wait time and visit length. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of a stratified random sampling of 35,849 patient visits to 364 nonfederal US hospital EDs in 2006, weighted to represent 119,191,528 visits to 4,654 EDs. Measures included EDs' median wait times and visit lengths, EDs' median proportion of patients treated by a physician within the time recommended at triage, and EDs' median proportion of patients dispositioned within 4 or 6 hours. RESULTS: In the median ED, 78% (interquartile range [IQR], 63% to 90%) of all patients and 67% (IQR, 52% to 82%) of patients who were triaged to be treated within 1 hour were treated by a physician within the target triage time. A total of 31% of EDs achieved the triage target for more than 90% of their patients; 14% of EDs achieved the triage target for 90% or more of patients triaged to be treated within an hour. In the median ED, 76% (IQR 54% to 94%) of patients were admitted within 6 hours. A total of 48% of EDs admitted more than 90% of their patients within 6 hours, but only 25% of EDs admitted more than 90% of their patients within 4 hours. CONCLUSION: A minority of hospitals consistently achieved recommended wait times for all ED patients, and fewer than half of hospitals consistently admitted their ED patients within 6 hours. Copyright (c) 2009. Published by Mosby, Inc.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Prolonged emergency department (ED) wait time and length of visit reduce quality of care and increase adverse events. Previous studies have not examined hospital-level performance on ED wait time and visit length in the United States. The purpose of this study is to describe hospital-level performance on ED wait time and visit length. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of a stratified random sampling of 35,849 patient visits to 364 nonfederal US hospital EDs in 2006, weighted to represent 119,191,528 visits to 4,654 EDs. Measures included EDs' median wait times and visit lengths, EDs' median proportion of patients treated by a physician within the time recommended at triage, and EDs' median proportion of patients dispositioned within 4 or 6 hours. RESULTS: In the median ED, 78% (interquartile range [IQR], 63% to 90%) of all patients and 67% (IQR, 52% to 82%) of patients who were triaged to be treated within 1 hour were treated by a physician within the target triage time. A total of 31% of EDs achieved the triage target for more than 90% of their patients; 14% of EDs achieved the triage target for 90% or more of patients triaged to be treated within an hour. In the median ED, 76% (IQR 54% to 94%) of patients were admitted within 6 hours. A total of 48% of EDs admitted more than 90% of their patients within 6 hours, but only 25% of EDs admitted more than 90% of their patients within 4 hours. CONCLUSION: A minority of hospitals consistently achieved recommended wait times for all ED patients, and fewer than half of hospitals consistently admitted their ED patients within 6 hours. Copyright (c) 2009. Published by Mosby, Inc.
Authors: Sylvie Cardin; Marc Afilalo; Eddy Lang; Jean-Paul Collet; Antoinette Colacone; Chris Tselios; Jerry Dankoff; Alex Guttman Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Brent R Asplin; David J Magid; Karin V Rhodes; Leif I Solberg; Nicole Lurie; Carlos A Camargo Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Daniel W Spaite; Fran Bartholomeaux; John Guisto; Elizabeth Lindberg; Becky Hull; Alicia Eyherabide; Sally Lanyon; Elizabeth A Criss; Terence D Valenzuela; Carol Conroy Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Elizabeth Lee-Lewandrowski; Daniel Corboy; Kent Lewandrowski; Julia Sinclair; Steven McDermot; Theodore I Benzer Journal: Arch Pathol Lab Med Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 5.534
Authors: Rahul Sharma; Mary R Mulcare; Riley Graetz; Peter W Greenwald; Anthony C Mustalish; Brian Miluszusky; Neal E Flomenbaum Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Kei Ouchi; Naomi George; Jeremiah D Schuur; Emily L Aaronson; Charlotta Lindvall; Edward Bernstein; Rebecca L Sudore; Mara A Schonberg; Susan D Block; James A Tulsky Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2019-02-13 Impact factor: 5.721