Literature DB >> 19796348

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead: principles, progress, and promises.

Haris M Haqqani1, Harry G Mond.   

Abstract

The prognostic benefit of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has been well established in multiple settings and its use is consequently widespread. Modern-day ICD systems use transvenous high-voltage leads to act as the interface between the heart and the generator, allowing for the sensing of a cardiac activity and the delivery of both bradycardia and tachycardia therapy, including high-voltage, high-current shocks. The ICD lead is in many ways the most fragile and critical component of the ICD system, and is subjected to more stress than any other implanted medical device. It has similar components to a pacing lead including tip and ring electrodes, fixation mechanism, conductors, insulators, and connector pins. In addition, it also contains the high-voltage shock coils that allow the delivery of defibrillation therapy to the cardiac tissue. The materials used to manufacture each of these components have undergone little evolution from their initial pacing lead-derived origin, but promising progress in this area is now occurring and better conductors and insulators have been developed. Lead body design continues to be multiluminal rather than coaxial, but various iterations of this basic paradigm continue to be investigated. In addition to miniaturization of the entire ICD lead, new industry standard lead connectors will also be introduced to reduce complexity and pocket bulk. However, long-term failure rates have been considerable, with lead failure related to both conductor and insulator malfunction. It is hoped that recent improvements in an ICD lead design and manufacture will result in a good functionality with a reliable long-term performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19796348     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02492.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  11 in total

Review 1.  Dual- versus single-coil implantable defibrillator leads: review of the literature.

Authors:  Jörg Neuzner; Jörg Carlsson
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  The effect of device advisories on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy.

Authors:  Mitesh S Amin; Kenneth A Ellenbogen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  [ICD leads].

Authors:  Carsten W Israel; Mohamed Karim Sheta
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2015-06

Review 4.  Skeletal myoblasts for cardiac repair.

Authors:  Shazia Durrani; Mikhail Konoplyannikov; Muhammad Ashraf; Khawaja Husnain Haider
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.806

5.  A Novel Solution for the High Defibrillation Threshold in Patients with a DF-4 Lead: Adding a High Voltage Adaptor/Splitter.

Authors:  Shmuel Inbar; Srikanth Seethala
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2014-05-25

6.  Long-term reliability of the defibrillator lead inserted by the extrathoracic subclavian puncture.

Authors:  Masaya Watanabe; Hisashi Yokoshiki; Hirofumi Mitsuyama; Kazuya Mizukami; Taro Tenma; Rui Kamada; Masayuki Takahashi; Yoshiro Matsui; Toshihisa Anzai
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2018-08-18

7.  Safety of Lead Repair Compared to Lead Revision for Visible Lead Insulation Defects in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.

Authors:  Yehia Fanous; Lorne Gula; Allan Skanes; Anthony Tang; Raymond Yee; Habib R Khan
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2021-08-10

8.  A novel use of EP catheter in extraction of trapped intracardiac devices: Two case reports.

Authors:  Dilip Kumar; Sunip Banerjee; Jaynarayan Naik; Kinnari Gupta; Rana Rathor Roy; Arvind Kumar
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2015-12-18

9.  Polymorphisms in Fibronectin Binding Proteins A and B among Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Isolates Are Not Associated with Arthroplasty Infection.

Authors:  Emily M Eichenberger; Joshua T Thaden; Batu Sharma-Kuinkel; Lawrence P Park; Thomas H Rude; Felicia Ruffin; Nina J Hos; Harald Seifert; Siegbert Rieg; Winfried V Kern; Steven K Lower; Vance G Fowler; Achim J Kaasch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Mending a broken heart: current strategies and limitations of cell-based therapy.

Authors:  Lee Chuen Liew; Beatrice Xuan Ho; Boon-Seng Soh
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 6.832

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.