Literature DB >> 19793755

Sauropod dinosaurs evolved moderately sized genomes unrelated to body size.

Chris L Organ1, Stephen L Brusatte, Koen Stein.   

Abstract

Sauropodomorph dinosaurs include the largest land animals to have ever lived, some reaching up to 10 times the mass of an African elephant. Despite their status defining the upper range for body size in land animals, it remains unknown whether sauropodomorphs evolved larger-sized genomes than non-avian theropods, their sister taxon, or whether a relationship exists between genome size and body size in dinosaurs, two questions critical for understanding broad patterns of genome evolution in dinosaurs. Here we report inferences of genome size for 10 sauropodomorph taxa. The estimates are derived from a Bayesian phylogenetic generalized least squares approach that generates posterior distributions of regression models relating genome size to osteocyte lacunae volume in extant tetrapods. We estimate that the average genome size of sauropodomorphs was 2.02 pg (range of species means: 1.77-2.21 pg), a value in the upper range of extant birds (mean = 1.42 pg, range: 0.97-2.16 pg) and near the average for extant non-avian reptiles (mean = 2.24 pg, range: 1.05-5.44 pg). The results suggest that the variation in size and architecture of genomes in extinct dinosaurs was lower than the variation found in mammals. A substantial difference in genome size separates the two major clades within dinosaurs, Ornithischia (large genomes) and Saurischia (moderate to small genomes). We find no relationship between body size and estimated genome size in extinct dinosaurs, which suggests that neutral forces did not dominate the evolution of genome size in this group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19793755      PMCID: PMC2817110          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  17 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of dinosaurs.

Authors:  P C Sereno
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-06-25       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  A bird's-eye view of the C-value enigma: genome size, cell size, and metabolic rate in the class aves.

Authors:  T Ryan Gregory
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Exploring frontiers in the DNA landscape: an introduction to the symposium "Genome Analysis and the Molecular Systematics of Retroelements".

Authors:  Andrew M Shedlock
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 15.683

4.  Palaeogenomics of pterosaurs and the evolution of small genome size in flying vertebrates.

Authors:  Chris L Organ; Andrew M Shedlock
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Superiority, competition, and opportunism in the evolutionary radiation of dinosaurs.

Authors:  Stephen L Brusatte; Michael J Benton; Marcello Ruta; Graeme T Lloyd
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Genome size and wing parameters in passerine birds.

Authors:  Chandler B Andrews; Stuart A Mackenzie; T Ryan Gregory
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Three tiers of genome evolution in reptiles.

Authors:  Chris L Organ; Ricardo Godínez Moreno; Scott V Edwards
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 3.326

8.  Assessing dinosaur growth patterns: a microscopic revolution.

Authors:  Gregory M Erickson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 17.712

9.  Molecular phylogenetics of mastodon and Tyrannosaurus rex.

Authors:  Chris L Organ; Mary H Schweitzer; Wenxia Zheng; Lisa M Freimark; Lewis C Cantley; John M Asara
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Origin of avian genome size and structure in non-avian dinosaurs.

Authors:  Chris L Organ; Andrew M Shedlock; Andrew Meade; Mark Pagel; Scott V Edwards
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  6 in total

1.  Sequencing three crocodilian genomes to illuminate the evolution of archosaurs and amniotes.

Authors:  John A St John; Edward L Braun; Sally R Isberg; Lee G Miles; Amanda Y Chong; Jaime Gongora; Pauline Dalzell; Christopher Moran; Bertrand Bed'hom; Arkhat Abzhanov; Shane C Burgess; Amanda M Cooksey; Todd A Castoe; Nicholas G Crawford; Llewellyn D Densmore; Jennifer C Drew; Scott V Edwards; Brant C Faircloth; Matthew K Fujita; Matthew J Greenwold; Federico G Hoffmann; Jonathan M Howard; Taisen Iguchi; Daniel E Janes; Shahid Yar Khan; Satomi Kohno; Ap Jason de Koning; Stacey L Lance; Fiona M McCarthy; John E McCormack; Mark E Merchant; Daniel G Peterson; David D Pollock; Nader Pourmand; Brian J Raney; Kyria A Roessler; Jeremy R Sanford; Roger H Sawyer; Carl J Schmidt; Eric W Triplett; Tracey D Tuberville; Miryam Venegas-Anaya; Jason T Howard; Erich D Jarvis; Louis J Guillette; Travis C Glenn; Richard E Green; David A Ray
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 13.583

2.  Variation of osteocyte lacunae size within the tetrapod skeleton: implications for palaeogenomics.

Authors:  Shaena Montanari; Stephen L Brusatte; Wendy De Wolf; Mark A Norell
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Long bone histology of the stem salamander Kokartus honorarius (Amphibia: Caudata) from the Middle Jurassic of Kyrgyzstan.

Authors:  Pavel Skutschas; Koen Stein
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Scaling of statically derived osteocyte lacunae in extant birds: implications for palaeophysiological reconstruction.

Authors:  Orvil Grunmeier; Michael D D'Emic
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  The relationship between genome size and metabolic rate in extant vertebrates.

Authors:  Jacob D Gardner; Michel Laurin; Chris L Organ
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Quantitative histological models suggest endothermy in plesiosaurs.

Authors:  Corinna V Fleischle; Tanja Wintrich; P Martin Sander
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.