OBJECTIVES: To test the predictive properties of the Vulnerable Elders-13 Survey (VES-13) a short tool that predicts functional decline and mortality over a 1- to 2-year follow-up interval over a 5-year interval. DESIGN: Longitudinal evaluation with mean follow-up of 4.5 years. SETTING: Two managed-care organizations. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred forty-nine community-dwelling older adults (> or = 75) enrolled in the Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders observational study who screened positive for symptoms of falls or fear of falling, bothersome urinary incontinence, or memory problems. MEASUREMENTS: VES-13 score (range 1-10, higher score indicates worse prognosis), functional decline (decline in count of 5 activities of daily living or nursing home entry), and deaths. RESULTS: Higher VES-13 scores were associated with greater predicted probability of death and decline in older patients over a mean observation period of 4.5 years. For each additional VES-13 point, the odds of the combined outcome of functional decline or death was 1.37 (95% confidence interval (CI)=1.25-1.50), and the area under the receiver operating curve was 0.75 (95% CI=0.71-0.80). In the Cox proportional hazards model predicting time to death, the hazard ratio was 1.23 (95% CI=1.19-1.27) per additional VES-13 point. CONCLUSION: This study extends the utility of the VES-13 to clinical decisions that require longer-term prognostic estimates of functional status and survival.
OBJECTIVES: To test the predictive properties of the Vulnerable Elders-13 Survey (VES-13) a short tool that predicts functional decline and mortality over a 1- to 2-year follow-up interval over a 5-year interval. DESIGN: Longitudinal evaluation with mean follow-up of 4.5 years. SETTING: Two managed-care organizations. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred forty-nine community-dwelling older adults (> or = 75) enrolled in the Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders observational study who screened positive for symptoms of falls or fear of falling, bothersome urinary incontinence, or memory problems. MEASUREMENTS: VES-13 score (range 1-10, higher score indicates worse prognosis), functional decline (decline in count of 5 activities of daily living or nursing home entry), and deaths. RESULTS: Higher VES-13 scores were associated with greater predicted probability of death and decline in older patients over a mean observation period of 4.5 years. For each additional VES-13 point, the odds of the combined outcome of functional decline or death was 1.37 (95% confidence interval (CI)=1.25-1.50), and the area under the receiver operating curve was 0.75 (95% CI=0.71-0.80). In the Cox proportional hazards model predicting time to death, the hazard ratio was 1.23 (95% CI=1.19-1.27) per additional VES-13 point. CONCLUSION: This study extends the utility of the VES-13 to clinical decisions that require longer-term prognostic estimates of functional status and survival.
Authors: D Saliba; M Elliott; L Z Rubenstein; D H Solomon; R T Young; C J Kamberg; C Roth; C H MacLean; P G Shekelle; E M Sloss; N S Wenger Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: David H Solomon; Neil S Wenger; Debra Saliba; Roy T Young; Alan M Adelman; Richard K Besdine; Dan G Blazer; Christine K Cassell; Jeffrey L Cummings; Paul R Katz; Dalane W Kitzman; Risa J Lavizzo-Mourey; Linda C Mondoux; Rose Popovich; Walter J Pories; Nanette Wenger Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Arti Hurria; Ilene S Browner; Harvey Jay Cohen; Crystal S Denlinger; Mollie deShazo; Martine Extermann; Apar Kishor P Ganti; Jimmie C Holland; Holly M Holmes; Mohana B Karlekar; Nancy L Keating; June McKoy; Bruno C Medeiros; Ewa Mrozek; Tracey O'Connor; Stephen H Petersdorf; Hope S Rugo; Rebecca A Silliman; William P Tew; Louise C Walter; Alva B Weir; Tanya Wildes Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: YaoYao G Pollock; Amanda L Blackford; Stacie C Jeter; Jean Wright; Ashley Cimino-Mathews; Melissa Camp; Susan Harvey; Fariba Asrari; Nancy L Schoenborn; Vered Stearns Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2016-10-03 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Lillian Min; Lauren Mazzurco; Tanya R Gure; Christine T Cigolle; Pearl Lee; Cathie Bloem; Chiao-Li Chan; Matthew A Romano; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Kenneth M Langa; Richard L Prager; Preeti N Malani Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2014-10-31 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Lillian Min; Neil Wenger; Anne M Walling; Caroline Blaum; Christine Cigolle; David A Ganz; David Reuben; Paul Shekelle; Carol Roth; Eve A Kerr Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2013-03-21 Impact factor: 5.562