OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate the Geriatric CompleXity of Care Index (GXI), a comorbidity index of medical, geriatric, and psychosocial conditions that addresses disease severity and intensity of ambulatory care for older adults with chronic conditions. DESIGN: DEVELOPMENT phase: variable selection and rating by clinician panel. VALIDATION phase: medical record review and secondary data analysis. SETTING: Assessing the Care of Vulnerable Elders-2 study. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred forty-four older (≥75) individuals receiving ambulatory care. DEVELOPMENT: 32 conditions categorized according to severity, resulting in 117 GXI variables. A panel of clinicians rated each GXI variable with respect to the added difficulty of providing primary care for an individual with that condition. VALIDATION: Modified versions of previously validated comorbidity measures (simple count, Charlson, Medicare Hierarchical Condition Category), longitudinal clinical outcomes (functional decline, survival), intensity of ambulatory care (primary, specialty care visits, polypharmacy, number of eligible quality indicators (NQI)) over 1 year of care. RESULTS: The most-morbid individuals (according to quintiles of GXI) had more visits (7.0 vs 3.7 primary care, 6.2 vs 2.4 specialist), polypharmacy (14.3% vs 0% had ≥14 medications), and greater NQI (33 vs 25) than the least-morbid individuals. Of the four comorbidity measures, the GXI was the strongest predictor of primary care visits, polypharmacy, and NQI (P < .001, controlling for age, sex, function-based vulnerability). CONCLUSION: Older adults with complex care needs, as measured by the GXI, have healthcare needs above what previously employed comorbidity measures captured. Healthcare systems could use the GXI to identify the most complex elderly adults and appropriately reimburse primary providers caring for older adults with the most complex care needs for providing additional visits and coordination of care.
OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate the Geriatric CompleXity of Care Index (GXI), a comorbidity index of medical, geriatric, and psychosocial conditions that addresses disease severity and intensity of ambulatory care for older adults with chronic conditions. DESIGN: DEVELOPMENT phase: variable selection and rating by clinician panel. VALIDATION phase: medical record review and secondary data analysis. SETTING: Assessing the Care of Vulnerable Elders-2 study. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred forty-four older (≥75) individuals receiving ambulatory care. DEVELOPMENT: 32 conditions categorized according to severity, resulting in 117 GXI variables. A panel of clinicians rated each GXI variable with respect to the added difficulty of providing primary care for an individual with that condition. VALIDATION: Modified versions of previously validated comorbidity measures (simple count, Charlson, Medicare Hierarchical Condition Category), longitudinal clinical outcomes (functional decline, survival), intensity of ambulatory care (primary, specialty care visits, polypharmacy, number of eligible quality indicators (NQI)) over 1 year of care. RESULTS: The most-morbid individuals (according to quintiles of GXI) had more visits (7.0 vs 3.7 primary care, 6.2 vs 2.4 specialist), polypharmacy (14.3% vs 0% had ≥14 medications), and greater NQI (33 vs 25) than the least-morbid individuals. Of the four comorbidity measures, the GXI was the strongest predictor of primary care visits, polypharmacy, and NQI (P < .001, controlling for age, sex, function-based vulnerability). CONCLUSION: Older adults with complex care needs, as measured by the GXI, have healthcare needs above what previously employed comorbidity measures captured. Healthcare systems could use the GXI to identify the most complex elderly adults and appropriately reimburse primary providers caring for older adults with the most complex care needs for providing additional visits and coordination of care.
Authors: Lillian C Min; David B Reuben; Emmett Keeler; David A Ganz; Constance H Fung; Paul Shekelle; Carol P Roth; Neil S Wenger Journal: Med Care Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: D Saliba; M Elliott; L Z Rubenstein; D H Solomon; R T Young; C J Kamberg; C Roth; C H MacLean; P G Shekelle; E M Sloss; N S Wenger Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Richard W Grant; Jeffrey M Ashburner; Clemens S Hong; Clemens C Hong; Yuchiao Chang; Michael J Barry; Steve J Atlas Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2011-12-20 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: S A Hunt; D W Baker; M H Chin; M P Cinquegrani; A M Feldman; G S Francis; T G Ganiats; S Goldstein; G Gregoratos; M L Jessup; R J Noble; M Packer; M A Silver; L W Stevenson; R J Gibbons; E M Antman; J S Alpert; D P Faxon; V Fuster; A K Jacobs; L F Hiratzka; R O Russell; S C Smith Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Niteesh K Choudhry; Michael A Fischer; Jerry Avorn; Joshua N Liberman; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Juliana Pakes; Troyen A Brennan; William H Shrank Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2011-05-09
Authors: Lillian Min; William Yoon; Jeff Mariano; Neil S Wenger; Marc N Elliott; Caren Kamberg; Debra Saliba Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2009-09-28 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Lillian Min; Eve A Kerr; Caroline S Blaum; David Reuben; Christine Cigolle; Neil Wenger Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2014-08-14 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Lillian Min; Christine T Cigolle; Steven J Bernstein; Kathleen Ward; Tisha L Moore; Jinkyung Ha; Caroline S Blaum Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Leah L Zullig; Heather E Whitson; Susan N Hastings; Chris Beadles; Julia Kravchenko; Igor Akushevich; Matthew L Maciejewski Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-09-30 Impact factor: 5.128