Literature DB >> 19789470

Augmented cerebral activation by lumbar mechanical stimulus in chronic low back pain patients: an FMRI study.

Yoshitaka Kobayashi1, Jiro Kurata, Miho Sekiguchi, Mika Kokubun, Takashi Akaishizawa, Yoshihiro Chiba, Shin-ichi Konno, Shin-ichi Kikuchi.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Cerebral activation by lumbar mechanical stimulus was investigated by functional magnetic resonance imaging in healthy subjects and patients with chronic low back pain (LBP).
OBJECTIVES: To characterize the cerebral substrates of LBP, and to explore a possible pathologic pattern of cerebral activation in chronic LBP patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The cerebral substrates of LBP have been poorly defined in contrast to those of cutaneous somatic pain.
METHODS: Eight healthy volunteers and 6 patients with idiopathic, chronic LBP were recruited. Each subject was placed in the prone position on a 3 Tesla MRI scanner, and stimulated by manual pressure with the tail of an air-filled, 20-mL syringe at 5 cm left of the fourth-fifth lumbar spinal interspace. Three blocks of 30-second painful stimulus, calibrated at either 3 or 5 on the 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS), were applied with intervening 30-second rest conditions during whole-brain echo-planar imaging. VAS of pain intensity and unpleasantness were evaluated after each session. Functional imaging was analyzed using a multisubject general linear model with Bonferroni multiple comparisons at P < 0.05.
RESULTS: Pain thresholds were smaller (P < 0.05) and VAS of unpleasantness was larger in LBP patients than in healthy subjects. Activation was observed at the prefrontal, insular, posterior cingulate cortices (PCC), supplementary motor, and premotor areas predominantly in the right hemisphere, but not at the somatosensory cortices. LBP patients showed augmented activation compared with healthy volunteers specifically at the right insula, supplementary motor, and PCC.
CONCLUSION: Chronic LBP patients showed increased tenderness at the lower back, higher aversive reaction to pain, and augmented LBP-related cerebral activation. The LBP-related activation is characterized by the absence of sensory-discriminative component and the involvement of PCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19789470     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b1fb76

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  38 in total

1.  Neural correlates of chronic low back pain measured by arterial spin labeling.

Authors:  Ajay D Wasan; Marco L Loggia; Li Q Chen; Vitaly Napadow; Jian Kong; Randy L Gollub
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Suppressed descending pain modulatory and enhanced sensorimotor networks in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Tianjiao Li; Shuo Zhang; Jiro Kurata
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Spinal manipulation does not affect pressure pain thresholds in the absence of neuromodulators: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Max K Jordon; Paul F Beattie; Sarah D'Urso; Sarah Scriven
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2016-09-12

4.  Attenuation of cortical activity triggering descending pain inhibition in chronic low back pain patients: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Yohei Matsuo; Jiro Kurata; Miho Sekiguchi; Katsuhiro Yoshida; Takuya Nikaido; Shin-Ichi Konno
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  The frequency and reliability of cortical activity using a novel strategy to present pressure pain stimulus over the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Charles W Gay; Mark O Papuga; Mark D Bishop; Paul Dougherty
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Functional MRI Signature of Chronic Pain Relief From Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease Patients.

Authors:  Marisa DiMarzio; Tanweer Rashid; Ileana Hancu; Eric Fiveland; Julia Prusik; Michael Gillogly; Radhika Madhavan; Suresh Joel; Jennifer Durphy; Eric Molho; Era Hanspal; Damian Shin; Julie G Pilitsis
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Are Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologies Crucial to Our Understanding of Spinal Conditions?

Authors:  Rebecca J Crawford; Maryse Fortin; Kenneth A Weber; Andrew Smith; James M Elliott
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.751

8.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Affective Symptoms and Functioning in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pilot Double-Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Timothy Y Mariano; Frederick W Burgess; Marguerite Bowker; Jason Kirschner; Mascha Van't Wout-Frank; Richard N Jones; Christopher W Halladay; Michael Stein; Benjamin D Greenberg
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.750

9.  The cortical and cerebellar representation of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Bart Boendermaker; Michael L Meier; Roger Luechinger; B Kim Humphreys; Sabina Hotz-Boendermaker
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Immediate changes after manual therapy in resting-state functional connectivity as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging in participants with induced low back pain.

Authors:  Charles W Gay; Michael E Robinson; Steven Z George; William M Perlstein; Mark D Bishop
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 1.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.