Charles W Gay1, Mark O Papuga2, Mark D Bishop3, Paul Dougherty4. 1. Rehabilitation Science Program, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. Electronic address: chaz.gay@phhp.ufl.edu. 2. Department of Research, New York Chiropractic College, Seneca Falls, NY, USA. Electronic address: opapuga@nycc.edu. 3. Department of Physical Therapy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. Electronic address: bish@phhp.ufl.edu. 4. Department of Research, New York Chiropractic College, Seneca Falls, NY, USA; Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA; Canadaigua VA Medical Center, Canadaigua, NY, USA. Electronic address: Paul.Dougherty@va.gov.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The blocked stimulus presentation strategy, in fMRI study designs, is an important means to study brain function related to a particular stimulus. Specifically, applying pressure stimuli perceived as painful to different anatomical regions has been used to improve our understanding of central sensitization, which is an important clinical phenomenon in chronic pain. NEW METHOD: This paper introduces a novel MR-compatible device used to apply pressure pain stimuli to the lumbar spine of 13 subjects in the supine position. We present the frequency of individuals and within-subject reliability of cortical activity in the following brain regions: the primary somatosensory cortex, insula and anterior cingulate cortex bilaterally. RESULTS: Using the novel MR-compatible device, a high frequency of individuals showed cortical activity within the a priori brain regions. There was good to excellent run-to-run reliability for peak voxel, while cluster size was less reliable. We found a higher than expected association between stimulus presentation and movement artifacts. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): Unlike previous methods, the current strategy can apply pressure stimuli to subjects over the lumbar spine while they lay supine. Previous methods required subjects to lay prone. CONCLUSIONS: This strategy could be used for evaluating pressure stimuli related central sensitization associated with back pain.
BACKGROUND: The blocked stimulus presentation strategy, in fMRI study designs, is an important means to study brain function related to a particular stimulus. Specifically, applying pressure stimuli perceived as painful to different anatomical regions has been used to improve our understanding of central sensitization, which is an important clinical phenomenon in chronic pain. NEW METHOD: This paper introduces a novel MR-compatible device used to apply pressure pain stimuli to the lumbar spine of 13 subjects in the supine position. We present the frequency of individuals and within-subject reliability of cortical activity in the following brain regions: the primary somatosensory cortex, insula and anterior cingulate cortex bilaterally. RESULTS: Using the novel MR-compatible device, a high frequency of individuals showed cortical activity within the a priori brain regions. There was good to excellent run-to-run reliability for peak voxel, while cluster size was less reliable. We found a higher than expected association between stimulus presentation and movement artifacts. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): Unlike previous methods, the current strategy can apply pressure stimuli to subjects over the lumbar spine while they lay supine. Previous methods required subjects to lay prone. CONCLUSIONS: This strategy could be used for evaluating pressure stimuli related central sensitization associated with back pain.
Authors: Alejandro Caceres; Deanna L Hall; Fernando O Zelaya; Steven C R Williams; Mitul A Mehta Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2008-12-31 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Alban Y Neziri; Michele Curatolo; Andreas Limacher; Eveline Nüesch; Bogdan Radanov; Ole K Andersen; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Peter Jüni Journal: Pain Date: 2012-07-28 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Thorsten Giesecke; Richard H Gracely; Masilo A B Grant; Alf Nachemson; Frank Petzke; David A Williams; Daniel J Clauw Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2004-02
Authors: David J Brandt; Jens Sommer; Sören Krach; Johannes Bedenbender; Tilo Kircher; Frieder M Paulus; Andreas Jansen Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2013-12-09 Impact factor: 4.157