Literature DB >> 19788002

Biobank research: reporting results to individual participants.

Jasper Bovenberg1, Tineke Meulenkamp, Ellen Smets, Sjef Gevers.   

Abstract

Over the last years we conducted an extensive study on the question whether and, if so, how, any results to be derived from research with large scale biobanks shoud be communicated to individual research participants. More specifically, our research intended (1) to assess the attitudes and information preferences of major stakeholders (participants/researchers), and (2) to examine whether there are any legal obligations of researchers to provide feedback to individuals. Our aim was to elaborate a general normative framework that could provide (further) guidance in this matter and be taken into account in the establishment and operation of biobanks. In this article, we first summarize the results of the empirical study on attitudes and preferences; subsequently, address the legal aspects. The article ends with a section that discusses our main findings and provides the basis for the guiding principles we propose; the principles themselves are located in an Annex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19788002     DOI: 10.1163/157180909x453062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Law        ISSN: 0929-0273


  9 in total

1.  Secondary variants--in defense of a more fitting term in the incidental findings debate.

Authors:  Gabrielle M Christenhusz; Koenraad Devriendt; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 2.  The Bio-PIN: a concept to improve biobanking.

Authors:  J J Nietfeld; Jeremy Sugarman; Jan-Eric Litton
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  A closer look at the recommended criteria for disclosing genetic results: perspectives of medical genetic specialists, genomic researchers, and institutional review board chairs.

Authors:  Debra S Brandt; Laura Shinkunas; Stephen L Hillis; Sandra E Daack-Hirsch; Martha Driessnack; Nancy R Downing; Megan F Liu; Lisa L Shah; Janet K Williams; Christian M Simon
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Canadian Research Ethics Board Leadership Attitudes to the Return of Genetic Research Results to Individuals and Their Families.

Authors:  Conrad V Fernandez; P Pearl O'Rourke; Laura M Beskow
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 5.  Development and progress of Ireland's biobank network: Ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI), standardized documentation, sample and data release, and international perspective.

Authors:  Blanaid Mee; Eoin Gaffney; Sharon A Glynn; Simona Donatello; Paul Carroll; Elizabeth Connolly; Sarah Mc Garrigle; Terry Boyle; Delia Flannery; Francis J Sullivan; Paul McCormick; Mairead Griffin; Cian Muldoon; Joanna Fay; Tony O'Grady; Elaine Kay; Joe Eustace; Louise Burke; Asim A Sheikh; Stephen Finn; Richard Flavin; Francis J Giles
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Researchers' opinions towards the communication of results of biobank research: a survey study.

Authors:  Tineke M Meulenkamp; Sjef J K Gevers; Jasper A Bovenberg; Ellen M A Smets
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Practical implementation issues and challenges for biobanks in the return of individual research results.

Authors:  Marianna J Bledsoe; William E Grizzle; Brian J Clark; Nikolajs Zeps
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 8.  Ethical aspects of human biobanks: a systematic review.

Authors:  Danijela Budimir; Ozren Polasek; Ana Marusić; Ivana Kolcić; Tatijana Zemunik; Vesna Boraska; Ana Jeroncić; Mladen Boban; Harry Campbell; Igor Rudan
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.351

9.  Managing clinically significant findings in research: the UK10K example.

Authors:  Jane Kaye; Matthew Hurles; Heather Griffin; Jasote Grewal; Martin Bobrow; Nic Timpson; Carol Smee; Patrick Bolton; Richard Durbin; Stephanie Dyke; David Fitzpatrick; Karen Kennedy; Alastair Kent; Dawn Muddyman; Francesco Muntoni; Lucy F Raymond; Robert Semple; Tim Spector
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.246

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.