Literature DB >> 1978613

Does perioperative tactile evaluation of the train-of-four response influence the frequency of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade?

T Pedersen1, J Viby-Mogensen, U Bang, N V Olsen, E Jensen, J Engboek.   

Abstract

The authors conducted a randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate the usefulness of perioperative manual evaluation of the response to train-of-four (TOF) nerve stimulation. A total of 80 patients were divided into four groups of 20 each. For two groups (one given vecuronium and one pancuronium), the anesthetists assessed the degree of neuromuscular blockade during operation and during recovery from neuromuscular blockade by manual evaluation of the response to TOF nerve stimulation. In the other two groups, one of which received vecuronium and the other pancuronium, the anesthetists evaluated the degree of neuromuscular blockade solely by clinical criteria. The use of a nerve stimulator was found to have no effect on the dose of relaxant given during anesthesia, on the need for supplementary doses of anticholinesterase in the recovery room, on the time from end of surgery to end of anesthesia, or on the incidence of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade evaluated clinically. The median (and range of) TOF ratios recorded in the recovery room were 0.75 (0.33-0.96) and 0.79 (0.10-0.97) in the vecuronium groups monitored with and without a nerve stimulator, respectively. These ratios were significantly higher than those found in the pancuronium groups, which wre 0.66 (0.06-0.90) and 0.63 (0.29-0.95), respectively. However, no difference was found between the vecuronium and pancuronium groups in the number of patients showing clinical signs of residual neuromuscular blockade, as evaluated by the 5-s head-lift test.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1978613     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199011000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  8 in total

1.  [Effects of different doses of edrophonium antagonism of mivacurium-induced neuromuscular block in the presence of nitrous oxide, propofol, and alfentanil anesthesia].

Authors:  J Ripart; P Drolet; L Perreault; M Girard
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 2.  Monitoring during difficult airway management.

Authors:  Takashi Asai
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 3.  Neuromuscular monitoring: an update.

Authors:  Mădălina Duţu; Robert Ivaşcu; Oana Tudorache; Darius Morlova; Alina Stanca; Silvius Negoiţă; Dan Corneci
Journal:  Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2018-04

4.  Comparison of tactile and mechanomyographical assessment of response to double burst and train-of-four stimulation during moderate and profound neuromuscular blockade.

Authors:  H Kirkegaard-Nielsen; H S Helbo-Hansen; I K Severinsen; P Lindholm; H S Pedersen; M B Schmidt
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  Assessment of double-burst monitoring at 10 mA above threshold current.

Authors:  D G Silverman; S J Brull
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  Dose-response relationships for edrophonium antagonism of mivacurium-induced neuromuscular block during N2O-enflurane-alfentanil anaesthesia.

Authors:  J Marcotte; P Drolet; L Perreault; M Girard
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.063

7.  Perioperative train-of-four monitoring and residual curarization.

Authors:  G D Shorten; H Merk; T Sieber
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.063

8.  National Scientific Medical Meeting. 31 March-1 April 1995. Abstracts.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.568

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.