PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the dose-response relationships for edrophonium antagonism of mivacurium-induced neuromuscular block. METHOD: Seventy-five ASA physical status I or II adults were given mivacurium 0.15 mg.kg-1 followed by an infusion (7 micrograms.kg-1.min-1) during alfentanil-propofol-N2O anaesthesia. Train-of-four stimulation (TOF) was applied to the ulnar nerve every 20 sec and the response of the adductor digiti minimi was recorded (Relaxograph NMT-100, DATEX, Helsinki, Finland). Mivacurium infusion was adjusted at five minutes intervals in order to keep the height of the first twitch in TOF (T1) at 5% of its control value. At the end of surgery, the mivacurium infusion was stopped and edrophonium 0.0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5 or 1.0 mg.kg-1 combined respectively with glycopyrrolate 0.0, 0.0005, 0.001, 0.005 or 0.01 mg.kg-1 were administered by random allocation. RESULTS: All four edrophonium doses tested were statistically different from placebo with regard to time to attain a TOF ratio (fourth twitch in TOF/T1) = 0.7 (0.05:780 +/- 179, 0.1:727 +/- 216, 0.5:547 +/- 287 and 1.0:640 +/- 236 vs 0.0 mg.kg-1:1089 +/- 323 sec P < 0.05). Does of 0.1, 0.5 and 1.0 mg.kg-1 permitted faster recovery time of T1 from 10 to 95% (T10-95) (567 +/- 236, 419 +/- 166, 555 +/- 288 vs 861 +/- 224 sec P < 0.05) and from 25 to 75% (T25-75) (253 +/- 121, 147 +/- 92, 217 +/- 175 vs 429 +/- 154 sec P < 0.05) than did placebo. However, data showed considerable variability for all neuromuscular indices, no matter the dose of edrophonium used. CONCLUSION:Edrophonium in doses of 0.1 mg.kg-1 and higher permitted faster recovery of all indices from a mivacurium-induced block during alfentanil-propofol-N2O anaesthesia than did placebo.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the dose-response relationships for edrophonium antagonism of mivacurium-induced neuromuscular block. METHOD: Seventy-five ASA physical status I or II adults were given mivacurium 0.15 mg.kg-1 followed by an infusion (7 micrograms.kg-1.min-1) during alfentanil-propofol-N2O anaesthesia. Train-of-four stimulation (TOF) was applied to the ulnar nerve every 20 sec and the response of the adductor digiti minimi was recorded (Relaxograph NMT-100, DATEX, Helsinki, Finland). Mivacurium infusion was adjusted at five minutes intervals in order to keep the height of the first twitch in TOF (T1) at 5% of its control value. At the end of surgery, the mivacurium infusion was stopped and edrophonium 0.0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5 or 1.0 mg.kg-1 combined respectively with glycopyrrolate 0.0, 0.0005, 0.001, 0.005 or 0.01 mg.kg-1 were administered by random allocation. RESULTS: All four edrophonium doses tested were statistically different from placebo with regard to time to attain a TOF ratio (fourth twitch in TOF/T1) = 0.7 (0.05:780 +/- 179, 0.1:727 +/- 216, 0.5:547 +/- 287 and 1.0:640 +/- 236 vs 0.0 mg.kg-1:1089 +/- 323 sec P < 0.05). Does of 0.1, 0.5 and 1.0 mg.kg-1 permitted faster recovery time of T1 from 10 to 95% (T10-95) (567 +/- 236, 419 +/- 166, 555 +/- 288 vs 861 +/- 224 sec P < 0.05) and from 25 to 75% (T25-75) (253 +/- 121, 147 +/- 92, 217 +/- 175 vs 429 +/- 154 sec P < 0.05) than did placebo. However, data showed considerable variability for all neuromuscular indices, no matter the dose of edrophonium used. CONCLUSION:Edrophonium in doses of 0.1 mg.kg-1 and higher permitted faster recovery of all indices from a mivacurium-induced block during alfentanil-propofol-N2O anaesthesia than did placebo.
Authors: J J Savarese; H H Ali; S J Basta; P B Embree; R P Scott; N Sunder; J N Weakly; W B Wastila; H A el-Sayad Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 1988-05 Impact factor: 7.892