Literature DB >> 7586111

Perioperative train-of-four monitoring and residual curarization.

G D Shorten1, H Merk, T Sieber.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that perioperative train-of-four (TOF) monitoring does not reduce the incidence of postoperative residual curarization (PORC). The purpose of this study was to examine whether the use of tactile assessment of the response of the adductor pollicis to supramaximal TOF stimulation of the ulnar nerve at the wrist during anaesthesia affected the incidence of PORC. Thirty-nine ASA I or II surgical patients were studied during thiopentone/fentanyl N2O/enflurane anaesthesia. Pancuronium (70-100 micrograms.kg-1) was used to facilitate tracheal intubation and additional pancuronium increments used to maintain surgical relaxation. The requirement for incremental doses of pancuronium and adequacy of recovery following reversal were assessed according to random allocation, either with (Group A; n = 20) or without (Group B; n = 19) access to TOF monitoring. Patients in the two groups received neostigmine in similar doses (Group A: 53 micrograms.kg-1 (5.9); Group B: 55 micrograms.kg-1 (5.4)). On arrival of the patient to the recovery area, neuromuscular function was assessed electromyographically (using the Datex NMT 221 to measure TOF ratio) and clinically. The incidence of PORC (TOF ratio < 70%) was greater in Group B (47%) than in Group A (15%) (P = 0.029). We conclude that the use of perioperative TOF monitoring decreases the incidence of pancuronium-induced PORC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7586111     DOI: 10.1007/BF03012670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  19 in total

1.  The effect of tubocurarine on indirectly elicited train-of-four muscle response and respiratory measurements in humans.

Authors:  H H Ali; R S Wilson; J J Savarese; R J Kitz
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Nerve stimulation and residual neuromuscular block.

Authors:  H H Ali; G Shorten
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Comparison of recovery after neuromuscular blockade by atracurium or pancuronium.

Authors:  P Hutton; K R Burchett; A P Madden
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Recovery of neuromuscular function and postoperative morbidity following blockade by atracurium, alcuronium and vecuronium.

Authors:  K L Kong; G M Cooper
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  Vecuronium neuromuscular blockade at the adductor muscles of the larynx and adductor pollicis.

Authors:  F Donati; C Meistelman; B Plaud
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 6.  Postoperative residual curarisation: incidence, aetiology and associated morbidity.

Authors:  G D Shorten
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.669

7.  Recovery characteristics following antagonism of atracurium with neostigmine or edrophonium.

Authors:  R M Jones; A C Pearce; J P Williams
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Tactile and visual evaluation of the response to train-of-four nerve stimulation.

Authors:  J Viby-Mogensen; N H Jensen; J Engbaek; H Ording; L T Skovgaard; B Chraemmer-Jørgensen
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Comparison of atracurium and alcuronium in day-case gynaecological surgery.

Authors:  K M Collins; O M Plantevin; P W Docherty
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 6.955

10.  Residual curarisation: a comparative study of atracurium and pancuronium.

Authors:  B N Andersen; J V Madsen; B A Schurizek; B Juhl
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 2.105

View more
  2 in total

1.  Neuromuscular monitoring: does it make a difference?

Authors:  R Martin; I Bourdua; S Thériault; J P Tétrault; M Pilote
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  Paravertebral block using levobupivacaine or dexmedetomidine-levobupivacaine for analgesia after cholecystectomy: a randomized double-blind trial.

Authors:  Indu Mohini Sen; K Prashanth; Nidhi Bhatia; Nitika Goel; Lileswar Kaman
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-02-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.