| Literature DB >> 19785776 |
Magdalena Serrano1, Jorge H Calvo, Marta Martínez, Ane Marcos-Carcavilla, Javier Cuevas, Carmen González, Juan J Jurado, Paloma Díez de Tejada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Assessing genetic biodiversity and population structure of minor breeds through the information provided by neutral molecular markers, allows determination of their extinction risk and to design strategies for their management and conservation. Analysis of microsatellite loci is known to be highly informative in the reconstruction of the historical processes underlying the evolution and differentiation of animal populations. Guadarrama goat is a threatened Spanish breed which actual census (2008) consists of 3057 females and 203 males distributed in 22 populations more or less isolated. The aim of this work is to study the genetic status of this breed through the analysis of molecular data from 10 microsatellites typed in historic and actual live animals.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19785776 PMCID: PMC2761942 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-10-61
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genet ISSN: 1471-2156 Impact factor: 2.797
Figure 1Geographic distribution of the 20 Guadarrama goat populations analyzed.
Genetic variability at the microsatellites typed in the Guadarrama goat breed.
| ILSTS005 | 9 | 6484 | 0.491 | 0.504 | 0.442 | 3 | 0.0104 |
| RM006 | 20 | 5819 | 0.762 | 0.798 | 0.774 | 3 | 0.0212 |
| ILSTS011 | 11 | 6470 | 0.617 | 0.688 | 0.638 | 2 | 0.0563 |
| BM1818 | 11 | 1371 | 0.640 | 0.766 | 0.739 | 2 | 0.0984 |
| CSSM31 | 22 | 4750 | 0.782 | 0.865 | 0.851 | 2 | 0.0512 |
| CSSM066 | 36 | 6439 | 0.667 | 0.843 | 0.828 | 6 | 0.1161 |
| INRA006 | 17 | 4863 | 0.764 | 0.837 | 0.818 | 5 | 0.0452 |
| BM6526 | 19 | 6498 | 0.771 | 0.818 | 0.798 | 2 | 0.0281 |
| BM8125 | 9 | 6542 | 0.747 | 0.788 | 0.760 | 1 | 0.0258 |
| MCM53 | 16 | 5635 | 0.785 | 0.810 | 0.785 | 2 | 0.0140 |
k = number of alleles at each locus; N = number of individuals typed for each locus; Ho = mean heterozygosity observed (direct count estimate); He = mean heterozygosity expected (unbiased estimate Nei, 1987); PIC = polymorphic information content; UAN = Unique allele number; F(Null) = Null allele frequency estimated.
Summary of Wright's F-statistics for each loci in the Guadarrama goat breed
| ILSTS005 | 12960 | -0.023 (0.013) | 0.031 (0.023) | 0.052 (0.015) | 4.558 |
| RM006 | 11560 | 0.004 (0.009) | 0.044 (0.009) | 0.041 (0.006) | 5.848 |
| ILSTS011 | 12934 | 0.008 (0.009) | 0.106 (0.031) | 0.099 (0.028) | 2.275 |
| BM1818 | 2738 | 0.028 (0.015) | 0.206 (0.085) | 0.183 (0.083) | 1.116 |
| CSSM31 | 9438 | 0.034 (0.017) | 0.104 (0.020) | 0.073 (0.016) | 3.175 |
| CSSM066 | 12768 | 0.159 (0.015) | 0.219 (0.014) | 0.071 (0.005) | 3.271 |
| INRA006 | 9718 | 0.037 (0.014) | 0.091 (0.017) | 0.057 (0.014) | 4.136 |
| BM6526 | 12976 | -0.010 (0.007) | 0.063 (0.012) | 0.072 (0.012) | 3.222 |
| BM8125 | 13082 | -0.008 (0.010) | 0.056 (0.017) | 0.064 (0.014) | 3.656 |
| MCM53 | 11266 | -0.030 (0.007) | 0.034 (0.016) | 0.063 (0.013) | 3.718 |
| All | 10944 | 0.023 (0.018) | 0.095 (0.020) | 0.074 (0.011) | 3.128 |
S.E. standard error
* Nm gene flow estimated from Nm = 0.25(1- FST)/FST (Nei, 1987).
Wright's statistics according to Weir and Cockerham, 1984
Hardy-Weinberg exact test in the Guadarrama goat populations.
| 1 | 720 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ILSTS005 | 0.063° | 0.006 |
| 2 | 147 | 0.049 | 0.009 | RM006 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| 3 | 411 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ILSTS011 | 0.147° | 0.012 |
| 4 | 517 | 0.000 | 0.000 | BM1818 | 0.011 | 0.002 |
| 5 | 327 | 0.003 | 0.001 | CSSM31 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| 6 | 491 | 0.000 | 0.000 | CSSM066 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| 7 | 182 | 0.000 | 0.000 | INRA006 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| 8 | 218 | 0.004 | 0.002 | BM6526 | 0.850° | 0.020 |
| 9 | 272 | 0.000 | 0.000 | BM8125 | 0.169° | 0.017 |
| 10 | 141 | 0.805° | 0.017 | MCM53 | 0.998° | 0.000 |
| 11 | 305 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||
| 12 | 362 | 0.192° | 0.017 | |||
| 13 | 687 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||
| 14 | 183 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||
| 15 | 570 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||
| 16 | 279 | 0.067° | 0.010 | |||
| 17 | 187 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||
| 18 | 154 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||
| 19 | 264 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||
| 20 | 217 | 0.040 | 0.007 |
Markov chain parameters for all tests: Demorization: 1000; Batches: 100; Iterations per batch: 1000
° No significant departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
Alternative hypothesis was heterozygote deficit
Genetic diversity measures in each population of the Guadarrama goat breed.
| 1 | 10.70 | 0.724 (0.091) | 0.745 (0.090) | 0.028 (0.012-0.043) |
| 2 | 8.20 | 0.744 (0.163) | 0.741 (0.140) | -0.005 (-0.103-0.018) |
| 3 | 11.30 | 0.726 (0.120) | 0.741 (0.130) | 0.020 (-0.000-0.038) |
| 4 | 7.60 | 0.665 (0.115) | 0.697 (0.117) | 0.045 (-0.007-0.091) |
| 5 | 10.20 | 0.764 (0.093) | 0.777 (0.103) | 0.016 (-0.010-0.037) |
| 6 | 10.20 | 0.714 (0.095) | 0.746 (0.096) | 0.042 (-0.000-0.071) |
| 7 | 6.00 | 0.587 (0.118) | 0.627 (0.141) | 0.062 (-0.017-0.119) |
| 8 | 9.30 | 0.719 (0.097) | 0.749 (0.120) | 0.041 (-0.001-0.075) |
| 9 | 9.40 | 0.716 (0.119) | 0.745 (0.127) | 0.038 (0.011-0.062) |
| 10 | 7.70 | 0.765 (0.114) | 0.753 (0.082) | -0.015 (-0.056-0.014) |
| 11 | 9.80 | 0.695 (0.125) | 0.728 (0.117) | 0.047 (-0.013-0.090) |
| 12 | 7.80 | 0.663 (0.176) | 0.659 (0.158) | -0.006 (-0.031-0.015) |
| 13 | 13.00 | 0.754 (0.114) | 0.765 (0.114) | 0.014 (-0.003-0.029) |
| 14 | 9.40 | 0.719 (0.085) | 0.716 (0.099) | -0.004 (-0.046-0.023) |
| 15 | 7.60 | 0.653 (0.133) | 0.658 (0.125) | 0.007 (-0.010-0.022) |
| 16 | 8.70 | 0.647 (0.262) | 0.655 (0.264) | 0.011 (-0.013-0.032) |
| 17 | 8.50 | 0.714 (0.092) | 0.750 (0.080) | 0.047 (0.005-0.080) |
| 18 | 6.90 | 0.622 (0.166) | 0.667 (0.114) | 0.066 (-0.023-0.118) |
| 19 | 11.60 | 0.724 (0.177) | 0.760 (0.183) | 0.048 (0.022-0.069) |
| 20 | 6.80 | 0.688 (0.217) | 0.700 (0.213) | 0.017 (-0.045-0.050) |
Nall = Mean number of alleles per loci; Hobs = mean observed heterozygositiy; Hexp = Nei's (1978) unbiased expected heterozygosity. Standard deviation in brackets
** 10000 Bootstrap over FIS by population, IC 95% = confidence interval at 95%
Figure 2Log probability of data (L(K)) for K values ranging from 2 to 23 for the admixture and correlated frequencies model, under exhaustive sampling (averaged over 15 replicates) for the Guadarrama goat breed (K = number of clusters). Length of burn-in 10,000. MCMC 100,000 Vertical bars reflect standard deviations.
Percentages of animals at each pre-defined population (20) of Guadarrama goats and FST mean values in each of the 16 clusters inferred.
| 2 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 187 | ||
| 3 | 2 | 5 | 25 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 720 | ||
| 13 | 9 | 6 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 272 | ||
| 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 219 | ||
| 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 305 | ||
| 7 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 4 | 147 | ||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 570 | ||
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 20 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 517 | ||
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 362 | ||
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 141 | ||
| 8 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 687 | ||
| 4 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 491 | ||
| 5 | 3 | 13 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 326 | ||
| 6 | 4 | 6 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 11 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 183 | ||
| 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 14 | 4 | 3 | 182 | ||
| 4 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 264 | ||
| 7 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 411 | ||
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 154 | ||
| 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 218 | ||
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 279 | ||
| 0.093 | 0.135 | 0.099 | 0.105 | 0.106 | 0.205 | 0.175 | 0.114 | 0.108 | 0.128 | 0.095 | 0.106 | 0.102 | 0.130 | 0.161 | 0.137 | 6635 |
Values of the replicate with the highest value of the log probability of data (L(K))
Locus by locus AMOVA analysis considering groups (16) and populations (20) as sources of variation.
| Among groups | 2431.708 | 0.14910 | 3.83565 |
| Among populations within groups | 282.013 | 0.14419 | 3.70938 |
| Within populations | 39332.000 | 3.59399 | 92.45496 |
| Total | |||
| Among groups | 416659.723 | 24.69192 | 3.97462 |
| Among populations within groups | 40985.002 | 17.43235 | 2.80606 |
| Within populations | 6893964.834 | 579.11560 | 93.21932 |
| Total | 7351609.559 | 621.23987 | |
FST = number of different alleles; RST = squared size difference.