| Literature DB >> 25904931 |
Badr Benjelloun1, Florian J Alberto2, Ian Streeter3, Frédéric Boyer2, Eric Coissac2, Sylvie Stucki4, Mohammed BenBati5, Mustapha Ibnelbachyr6, Mouad Chentouf7, Abdelmajid Bechchari8, Kevin Leempoel4, Adriana Alberti9, Stefan Engelen9, Abdelkader Chikhi6, Laura Clarke3, Paul Flicek3, Stéphane Joost4, Pierre Taberlet2, François Pompanon2.
Abstract
Since the time of their domestication, goats (Capra hircus) have evolved in a large variety of locally adapted populations in response to different human and environmental pressures. In the present era, many indigenous populations are threatened with extinction due to their substitution by cosmopolitan breeds, while they might represent highly valuable genomic resources. It is thus crucial to characterize the neutral and adaptive genetic diversity of indigenous populations. A fine characterization of whole genome variation in farm animals is now possible by using new sequencing technologies. We sequenced the complete genome at 12× coverage of 44 goats geographically representative of the three phenotypically distinct indigenous populations in Morocco. The study of mitochondrial genomes showed a high diversity exclusively restricted to the haplogroup A. The 44 nuclear genomes showed a very high diversity (24 million variants) associated with low linkage disequilibrium. The overall genetic diversity was weakly structured according to geography and phenotypes. When looking for signals of positive selection in each population we identified many candidate genes, several of which gave insights into the metabolic pathways or biological processes involved in the adaptation to local conditions (e.g., panting in warm/desert conditions). This study highlights the interest of WGS data to characterize livestock genomic diversity. It illustrates the valuable genetic richness present in indigenous populations that have to be sustainably managed and may represent valuable genetic resources for the long-term preservation of the species.Entities:
Keywords: Capra hircus; Morocco; WGS; genomic diversity; indigenous populations; population genomics; selection signatures
Year: 2015 PMID: 25904931 PMCID: PMC4387958 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00107
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.599
Figure 1Distribution of goats sampled. (A) Geographic map showing the distribution of the 44 goats sampled in this study. Each point represents one individual and different colors illustrate different populations. (B) Striking phenotypic differences between the 3 main goat populations in Morocco.
Figure 2Phylogenetic network based on the mitochondrial HVI segment of the control region. Sequences of 41 Moroccan goats and the 22 references representing the worldwide diversity (Naderi et al., 2007) were used. The 22 reference identifiers start with ≪ Hg ≫ and the following letter indicate which haplogroup each belongs to. The other identifiers correspond to the Moroccan goats. The red letters give the names of the 6 haplogroups.
Figure 3Venn diagram of the number of polymorphic variants in the three Moroccan goat populations.
Figure 4Decay of linkage disequilibrium (. The Linkage Disequilibrium (LD) was calculated for the 44 Moroccan goats on 5 different segments of 2 Mb each on 5 different chromosomes. Inter-variant distances (bp) were binned and averaged into the classes: 0–0.2, 0.2–1, 1–2, 2–10, 10–30, 30–60, and 60–120 kb.
Figure 5WGS ancestry estimates for Moroccan goats for . (A) Each bar represents one individual. Different colors illustrate the assignment proportion (Q score) to each one of the assumed clusters. (B) Geographical distribution of individual Q-score values.
Top-20 candidate genes under positive selection in each Moroccan goat population using the top-0.1% XP-CLR scores autosomal-wide cut-off level.
| 6 | 29 | 4739 | 82.6 | 13 | 9 | 2493 | 94.0 | 4 | 14 | 33163 | 48.7 | |||
| 6 | 3 | 5501 | 61.4 | 26 | 24 | 5409 | 74.4 | 25 | 5 | 3977 | 42.8 | |||
| 6 | 1 | 699 | 54.0 | 13 | 2 | 995 | 71.3 | 25 | 4 | 2485 | 41.8 | |||
| 26 | 2 | 42409 | 45.6 | 14 | 36 | 21697 | 70.1 | 10 | 9 | 25094 | 39.8 | |||
| 3 | 5 | 3069 | 43.6 | 13 | 9 | 5294 | 66.1 | 25 | 14 | 9497 | 38.6 | |||
| 5 | 4 | 2786 | 41.8 | 7 | 5 | 1696 | 62.4 | 26 | 1 | 43841 | 35.7 | |||
| 2 | 3 | 1183 | 40.3 | 9 | 15 | 6353 | 61.4 | 25 | 2 | 9472 | 32.4 | |||
| 5 | 7 | 15223 | 39.7 | 14 | 10 | 2984 | 59.3 | 8 | 9 | 23504 | 32.0 | |||
| 3 | 1 | 7499 | 39.6 | 19 | 2 | 1770 | 58.2 | 19 | 11 | 53928 | 31.4 | |||
| 12 | 13 | 4139 | 39.6 | 15 | 17 | 28387 | 54.8 | 10 | 3 | 51372 | 31.2 | |||
| 12 | 25 | 3141 | 39.5 | 23 | 27 | 8506 | 52.9 | 12 | 2 | 1213 | 31.0 | |||
| 14 | 16 | 48818 | 38.0 | 24 | 6 | 78026 | 49.7 | 12 | 31 | 21437 | 30.9 | |||
| 14 | 1 | 298 | 37.5 | 5 | 3 | 4339 | 49.4 | 25 | 1 | 2127 | 30.8 | |||
| 29 | 6 | 10103 | 36.9 | 13 | 2 | 7340 | 48.8 | 26 | 7 | 8873 | 30.6 | |||
| 4 | 11 | 70095 | 35.7 | 24 | 10 | 10009 | 48.2 | 18 | 10 | 5817 | 29.5 | |||
| 22 | 3 | 11417 | 35.6 | 1 | 2 | 103547 | 46.0 | 18 | 2 | 10049 | 28.0 | |||
| 12 | 4 | 6149 | 34.3 | 14 | 7 | 8967 | 45.0 | 3 | 5 | 39379 | 27.8 | |||
| 14 | 5 | 46323 | 33.7 | 8 | 11 | 79003 | 43.1 | 7 | 1 | 2005 | 27.7 | |||
| 21 | 3 | 25060 | 33.4 | 8 | 10 | 10949 | 42.2 | 2 | 2 | 146650 | 27.4 | |||
| 7 | 2 | 42599 | 33.4 | 1 | 7 | 3341 | 41.7 | 5 | 2 | 3717 | 27.3 | |||
Coordinates of 20700 autosomal genes on the CHIR v1.0 goat assembly were used to identify candidate genes matching XP-CLR top scores. Genes were ranked according to the higher XP-CLR score. Chr, Chromosome. Number of top-scores, Number of grid points among the top-0.1% XP-CLR scores matching the gene. Distance/grid point: gene length/number of top-scores. Grid points in XP-CLR analysis were separated by 2.5 Kb.
Figure 6Plot of XP-CLR scores along autosomes in selective sweep analysis for the Draa goat population. The horizontal line indicates a 0.1% autosomal-wide cut-off level. Red arrows and names indicate the top three candidate genes.