Literature DB >> 19781735

Evaluation of the enterococci indicator in biosolids using culture-based and quantitative PCR assays.

Emily Viau1, Jordan Peccia.   

Abstract

The utility of the enterococci indicator for measuring biosolids quality was evaluated in biosolids from 22 U.S. wastewater treatment facilities. Enterococci were enumerated using 23S rRNA quantitative PCR (qPCR) and membrane filtration with mEI-agar culture analyses in biosolids collected after mesophilic anaerobic digestion (MAD, class B, 13 treatment plants), composting (class A, 10 treatment plants), and temperature-phased anaerobic digestion (TPAD, class A, six treatment plants). Enterococci qPCR and culture values were not significantly different for a given treatment (P>0.05, paired t-test) and both assays showed differences in biosolid treatment effectiveness-anaerobic digestion treatments averaged 5-5.5log genomic units (GU) and colony forming units (CFU)/dry g while composting decreased enterococci on average to 3.7logGU and 3.8logCFU/dry g. Only in class A TPAD biosolids dewatered with a belt-filter press were culture values significantly lower than qPCR values (1.7logCFU/dryg vs. 5GU/dryg). Further investigation of compost inactivation was compared for enterococci and other fecal indicators (n=5 treatment plants)-the enterococci indicator was more resistant to compost treatment than fecal coliforms, with reductions averaging only 1-2.5 logs for enterococci, male-specific coliphages, and sulfite-reducing Clostridia while 5-log reductions were observed for fecal coliforms. Lastly, biosolid isolates from culture-based methods were identified using DNA sequencing-these results revealed that non-enterococci, including Bacillus spp. and Vagococcus spp., were commonly isolated from compost and TPAD biosolids using mEI agar. Given the equivalency of culture- and qPCR-based enterococci concentrations in biosolids and the more conservative inactivation noted for both assays during class A composting, the use of enterococci qPCR monitoring could bypass non-specificity issues with culture-based methods while providing an improved description of pathogen fate in biosolids.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19781735     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  8 in total

1.  A perspective on the prevalence of DNA enteric virus genomes in anaerobic-digested biological wastes.

Authors:  Kelvin Wong; Irene Xagoraraki
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Comparison of genotypic and phylogenetic relationships of environmental Enterococcus isolates by BOX-PCR typing and 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

Authors:  Bina S Nayak; Brian Badgley; Valerie J Harwood
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Removal of faecal indicator pathogens from waters and wastewaters by photoelectrocatalytic oxidation on TiO(2)/Ti films under simulated solar radiation.

Authors:  Danae Venieri; Efthalia Chatzisymeon; Spiridon S Sofianos; Eleonora Politi; Nikolaos P Xekoukoulotakis; Alexandros Katsaounis; Dionissios Mantzavinos
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Decay of bacterial pathogens, fecal indicators, and real-time quantitative PCR genetic markers in manure-amended soils.

Authors:  Shane W Rogers; Matthew Donnelly; Lindsay Peed; Catherine A Kelty; Sumona Mondal; Zirong Zhong; Orin C Shanks
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Development of quantitative PCR assays targeting the 16S rRNA genes of Enterococcus spp. and their application to the identification of enterococcus species in environmental samples.

Authors:  Hodon Ryu; Michael Henson; Michael Elk; Carlos Toledo-Hernandez; John Griffith; Denene Blackwood; Rachel Noble; Michèle Gourmelon; Susan Glassmeyer; Jorge W Santo Domingo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Comparison of Methods to Identify Pathogens and Associated Virulence Functional Genes in Biosolids from Two Different Wastewater Treatment Facilities in Canada.

Authors:  Etienne Yergeau; Luke Masson; Miria Elias; Shurong Xiang; Ewa Madey; Hongsheng Huang; Brian Brooks; Lee A Beaudette
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  An investigation of the antibacterial ability and cytotoxicity of a novel cu-bearing 317L stainless steel.

Authors:  Da Sun; Dake Xu; Chunguang Yang; M Babar Shahzad; Ziqing Sun; Jin Xia; Jinlong Zhao; Tingyue Gu; Ke Yang; Guixue Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Fate of Viable but Non-culturable Listeria monocytogenes in Pig Manure Microcosms.

Authors:  Jérémy Desneux; Audrey Biscuit; Sylvie Picard; Anne-Marie Pourcher
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 5.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.