Literature DB >> 19781431

Predictors of 30-day mortality in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction despite a patent infarct artery.

Jason N Katz1, Amanda L Stebbins, John H Alexander, Harmony R Reynolds, Karen S Pieper, Witold Ruzyllo, Karl Werdan, Alexander Geppert, Vladimir Dzavik, Frans Van de Werf, Judith S Hochman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about predictors of survival in patients with persistent shock following acute myocardial infarction (MI) despite a patent infarct artery.
METHODS: We examined data from TRIUMPH, a multicenter randomized clinical trial of the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, L-N(G)-monomethyl-arginine, in patients with persistent vasopressor-dependent cardiogenic shock complicating acute MI at least 1 hour after established infarct-related artery patency. Patients who died within 30 days were compared with those who survived. Continuous variables were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank sum and categorical variables using the chi(2) test. Prespecified baseline variables were included in a multivariable logistic regression model to predict mortality. A second model incorporating baseline vasopressors and dosages and a third model including change in systolic blood pressure at 2 hours were also developed. Bootstrapping was used to assess the stability of model variables.
RESULTS: Of 396 patients, 180 (45.5%) died within 30 days. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), measured on vasopressor support, and creatinine clearance were significant predictors of mortality in all models. The number of vasopressors and norepinephrine dose were also predictors of mortality in the second model, but the latter was no longer significant when change in SBP at 2 hours was added as a covariate in the third model.
CONCLUSIONS: The SBP, creatinine clearance, and number of vasopressors are significant predictors of mortality in patients with persistent vasopressor-dependent cardiogenic shock following acute MI despite a patent infarct artery. These prognostic variables may be useful for risk-stratification and in selecting patients for investigation of additional therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19781431     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  18 in total

Review 1.  Management of refractory cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Alex Reyentovich; Maya H Barghash; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous ventricular assist device implantation for cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  David D Berg; Devraj Sukul; Molly O'Brien; Benjamin M Scirica; Piotr S Sobieszczyk; Benjamin A Olenchock; Erin A Bohula; David A Morrow
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2015-04-30

3.  Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute myocardial infarction-associated cardiogenic shock: can we predict survival before decision of implantation?

Authors:  Nicolas Persico; Jeremy Bourenne; Antoine Roch
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Interleukin-6, -7, -8 and -10 predict outcome in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Roland Prondzinsky; Susanne Unverzagt; Henning Lemm; Nikolas-Arne Wegener; Axel Schlitt; Konstantin M Heinroth; Sebastian Dietz; Ute Buerke; Patrick Kellner; Harald Loppnow; Martin G Fiedler; Joachim Thiery; Karl Werdan; Michael Buerke
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 5.  Therapeutic Advances in the Management of Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Ovidiu Chioncel; Sean P Collins; Andrew P Ambrosy; Peter S Pang; Razvan I Radu; Elena-Laura Antohi; Josep Masip; Javed Butler; Vlad Anton Iliescu
Journal:  Am J Ther       Date:  2019 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 2.688

6.  Intra-Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock: Clinical Response and Predictors of Stabilization.

Authors:  Marc A Sintek; Mark Gdowski; Brian R Lindman; Michael Nassif; Kory J Lavine; Eric Novak; Richard G Bach; Scott C Silvestry; Douglas L Mann; Susan M Joseph
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 5.712

7.  Mechanical circulatory support for advanced heart failure.

Authors:  Chetan B Patel; Kevin M Alexander; Joseph G Rogers
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2010-12

8.  Predictors of mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention and intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation.

Authors:  B Schwarz; M Abdel-Wahab; D R Robinson; G Richardt
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 9.  Hypertension and patients with acute coronary syndrome: Putting blood pressure levels into perspective.

Authors:  Konstantinos Konstantinou; Costas Tsioufis; Areti Koumelli; Manos Mantzouranis; Alexandros Kasiakogias; Michalis Doumas; Dimitris Tousoulis
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Left Ventricular Pressure Ratio Predicts In-Hospital Outcomes in Hospitalized Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Sameh W Almousa; Mark N Belkin; Tess Allan; Allison Stephens; Joseph Kern; Miryea Cisneros; Janet Friant; Cynthia Arevalo; Sandeep Nathan; Atman P Shah; Jonathan Paul; Rohan Kalathiya; Jonathan Grinstein; John E A Blair
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 2.022

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.