Literature DB >> 22072602

Fitness consequences of plants growing with siblings: reconciling kin selection, niche partitioning and competitive ability.

Amanda L File1, Guillermo P Murphy, Susan A Dudley.   

Abstract

Plant studies that have investigated the fitness consequences of growing with siblings have found conflicting evidence that can support different theoretical frameworks. Depending on whether siblings or strangers have higher fitness in competition, kin selection, niche partitioning and competitive ability have been invoked. Here, we bring together these processes in a conceptual synthesis and argue that they can be co-occurring. We propose that these processes can be reconciled and argue for a trait-based approach of measuring natural selection instead of the fitness-based approach to the study of sibling competition. This review will improve the understanding of how plants interact socially under competitive situations, and provide a framework for future studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22072602      PMCID: PMC3223689          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  41 in total

1.  Relatedness affects competitive performance of a parasitic plant (Cuscuta europaea) in multiple infections.

Authors:  S Puustinen; T Koskela; P Mutikainen
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.411

2.  Phylogenetic overdispersion in Floridian oak communities.

Authors:  J Cavender-Bares; D D Ackerly; D A Baum; F A Bazzaz
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-05-21       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Kin recognition, not competitive interactions, predicts root allocation in young Cakile edentula seedling pairs.

Authors:  Mudra V Bhatt; Aditi Khandelwal; Susan A Dudley
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 4.  The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms.

Authors:  Harsh P Bais; Tiffany L Weir; Laura G Perry; Simon Gilroy; Jorge M Vivanco
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 26.379

Review 5.  Disruptive selection and then what?

Authors:  Claus Rueffler; Tom J M Van Dooren; Olof Leimar; Peter A Abrams
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Antagonistic multilevel selection on size and architecture in variable density settings.

Authors:  Cynthia Weinig; Jill A Johnston; Charles G Willis; Julin N Maloof
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Disruptive selection in natural populations: the roles of ecological specialization and resource competition.

Authors:  Ryan A Martin; David W Pfennig
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  The components of kin competition.

Authors:  J David Van Dyken
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Kin selection and cooperative courtship in wild turkeys.

Authors:  Alan H Krakauer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Competitive ability not kinship affects growth of Arabidopsis thaliana accessions.

Authors:  Frédéric Masclaux; Robert L Hammond; Joël Meunier; Caroline Gouhier-Darimont; Laurent Keller; Philippe Reymond
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 10.151

View more
  23 in total

1.  Disturbance and density-dependent processes (competition and facilitation) influence the fine-scale genetic structure of a tree species' population.

Authors:  Alex Fajardo; Cristian Torres-Díaz; Irène Till-Bottraud
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Seeds integrate biological information about conspecific and allospecific neighbours.

Authors:  Akira Yamawo; Hiromi Mukai
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  New synthesis: volatiles bring out the animal in plants.

Authors:  Erik H Poelman
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Kinship and the evolution of social behaviours in the sea.

Authors:  Stephanie J Kamel; Richard K Grosberg
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Air-borne genotype by genotype indirect genetic effects are substantial in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans.

Authors:  N O Rode; P Soroye; R Kassen; H D Rundle
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 6.  The quantitative genetics of indirect genetic effects: a selective review of modelling issues.

Authors:  P Bijma
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Farming plant cooperation in crops.

Authors:  Germain Montazeaud; François Rousset; Florian Fort; Cyrille Violle; Hélène Fréville; Sylvain Gandon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Inter-varietal interactions among plants in genotypically diverse mixtures tend to decrease herbivore performance.

Authors:  Ian M Grettenberger; John F Tooker
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Kinship rivalry does not trigger specific allocation strategies in Lupinus angustifolius.

Authors:  Rubén Milla; Ainhoa Vélez del Burgo; Adrián Escudero; Jose M Iriondo
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Say it with flowers: flowering acceleration by root communication.

Authors:  Omer Falik; Ishay Hoffmann; Ariel Novoplansky
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2014-03-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.