| Literature DB >> 19779761 |
T Lang1, T Streeper, P Cawthon, K Baldwin, D R Taaffe, T B Harris.
Abstract
The aging process is associated with loss of muscle mass and strength and decline in physical functioning. The term sarcopenia is primarily defined as low level of muscle mass resulting from age-related muscle loss, but its definition is often broadened to include the underlying cellular processes involved in skeletal muscle loss as well as their clinical manifestations. The underlying cellular changes involve weakening of factors promoting muscle anabolism and increased expression of inflammatory factors and other agents which contribute to skeletal muscle catabolism. At the cellular level, these molecular processes are manifested in a loss of muscle fiber cross-sectional area, loss of innervation, and adaptive changes in the proportions of slow and fast motor units in muscle tissue. Ultimately, these alterations translate to bulk changes in muscle mass, strength, and function which lead to reduced physical performance, disability, increased risk of fall-related injury, and, often, frailty. In this review, we summarize current understanding of the mechanisms underlying sarcopenia and age-related changes in muscle tissue morphology and function. We also discuss the resulting long-term outcomes in terms of loss of function, which causes increased risk of musculoskeletal injuries and other morbidities, leading to frailty and loss of independence.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19779761 PMCID: PMC2832869 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-009-1059-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Osteoporos Int ISSN: 0937-941X Impact factor: 4.507
Fig. 1Hierarchical depiction of skeletal muscle structure, depicting the skeletal muscle fibers within the muscle bundle, a motor unit branching out to two muscle fibers and the detailed structure of myofibrils
Fig. 2Effect of age on the motor unit, depicting, young, aged, and aged sarcopenic fibers. This drawing depicts the pronounced denervation of type II fibers and the recruitment of type I fibers into surviving motor units in older subjects, with impairment of recruitment in sarcopenic subjects
Fig. 3Age effects on systemic factors influencing synthesis and degradation of skeletal muscle proteins
Age-related changes in muscle power and muscle strength
| Study | Gender | Measurement/joint/movement | Age range (years) | Study design | Changes with aginga |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dean et al. 2004 [ | F | IK/hip/FLX, EXT | 21–82 | CS | ↓22–33% |
| Johnson et al. 2004 [ | F | IK, IM/hip/AD, AB | 21–91 | CS | ↓24–34% IK, ↓44–56% IM |
| Kubo et al. 2007 [ | M | IM/ankle/PF | 20–77 | CS | ↓40% |
| Morse et al. 2005 [ | M | IM/ankle/PF | 25.3 ± 3.5–73.8 ± 3.5 | CS | ↓47% |
| Petrella et al. 2005 [ | M, F | IT/knee/EXT | 20–75 | CS | ↓41–137% |
| Lanza et al. 2003 [ | M | IT, IM/knee, ankle/EXT, DF | 20–85 | CS | ↓26–32% |
K isokinetic, IM isometric, IT isotonic, FLX flexion, EXT extension, AD adduction, AB abduction, PF plantar flexion; DF dorsiflexion, CS cross-sectional
aExpressed as percent change with aging
Studies examining various interventions for age-related muscle loss
| Study | Population | Gender | Age | N | Intervention | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solerte et al. (2008) [ | S | M, F | 66–84 | 41 | AA supp. |
|
| Trappe et al. (2000) [ | E | M | 74 ± 2 | 7 | RT |
|
| Trappe et al. (2001) [ | E | F | 74 ± 2 | 7 | RT |
|
| Slivka et al. (2008) [ | E | M | 80–86 | 6 | RT |
|
| Fiatarone et al. (1990) [ | E | M | 90 ± 3 | 10 | HIRT |
|
| Kryger et al. (2007) [ | E | M, F | 85–97 | 11 | RT |
|
| Frontera et al. (2003) [ | E | F | 68–79 | 14 | RT |
|
| Wittert et al. (2003) [ | E | M | 60–86 | 76 | TE | ↔S, |
S sarcopenia, E elderly, Myo-29 a myostatin inhibiting drug, AA Supp amino acid supplement, RT resistance training, HIRT high-intensity resistance training, TE testosterone, S strength, CSA muscle cross-sectional area, IGF-1 insulin-like growth factor 1, TNF-α tumor necrosis factor alpha, MHC I, myosin heavy chain type I isoform
Fig. 4CT acquisition through midthigh. Location of axial section is shown on localizer image at the left, with corresponding axial image in the middle and segmentation into distinct tissue compartments at the right. Green: subcutaneous fat. Olive: quadriceps muscle. Yellow: hamstrings muscle. Red: adductor muscles. Orange: sartorius muscle
Fig. 5MRI image of calf at the right, with green and yellow boxes indicating locations of spectroscopic acquisitions of the tibialis anterior and soleus muscles, respectively. Proton spectroscopy studies may be used to assess the relative amounts of intramyocellular and extramyocellular lipid. At the right, a proton spectrum corresponding to the soleus muscle shows 1H resonances associated with creatinine (CR2 and CR3), water, extramyocellular lipid (EMCL), intramyocellular lipid (IMCL), and trimethylamines (TMA)