Literature DB >> 11828225

Shorter, more frequent mechanical loading sessions enhance bone mass.

Alexander G Robling1, Felecia M Hinant, David B Burr, Charles H Turner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The beneficial effects of exercise on bone mass and strength can be attributed to the sensitivity of bone cells to mechanical stimuli. However, bone cells lose mechanosensitivity soon after they are stimulated. We investigated whether the osteogenic response to a simulated high-impact exercise program lasting 4 months could be enhanced by dividing the daily protocol into brief sessions of loading, separated by recovery periods.
METHODS: The right forelimbs of adult rats were subjected to 360 load cycles x d(-1), 3 d x wk(-1), for 16 wk. On each loading day, one group received all 360 cycles in a single, uninterrupted bout (360 x 1); the other group received 4 bouts of 90 cycles/bout (90 x 4), with each bout separated by 3 h. After sacrifice, bone mineral content (BMC), and areal bone mineral density (aBMD) were measured in the loaded (right) and nonloaded control (left) ulnae using DXA. Volumetric BMD (vBMD) and cross-sectional area (CSA) were measured at midshaft and the olecranon by using pQCT. Maximum and minimum second moments of area (I(MAX) and I(MIN)) were measured from the midshaft tomographs.
RESULTS: After 16 wk of loading, BMC, aBMD, vBMD, midshaft CSA, I(MAX), and I(MIN) were significantly greater in right (loaded) ulnae compared with left (nonloaded) ulnae in the two loaded groups. When the daily loading regimen was broken into four sessions per day (90x4), BMC, aBMD, midshaft CSA, and I(MIN) improved significantly over the loading schedule that applied the daily stimulus in a single, uninterrupted session (360x1).
CONCLUSION: Human exercise programs aimed at maintaining or improving bone mass might achieve greater success if the daily exercise regime is broken down into smaller sessions separated by recovery periods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11828225     DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200202000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  48 in total

1.  The relationship between bone mechanical properties and ground reaction forces in normal and hypermuscular mice.

Authors:  Daniel Schmitt; Ann C Zumwalt; Mark W Hamrick
Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol       Date:  2010-07-01

2.  Biomechanical forces exert anabolic effects on osteoblasts by activation of SMAD 1/5/8 through type 1 BMP receptor.

Authors:  B Rath; J Nam; J Deschner; J Schaumburger; M Tingart; S Grässel; J Grifka; S Agarwal
Journal:  Biorheology       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.875

3.  Osteoblasts subjected to spaceflight and simulated space shuttle launch conditions.

Authors:  Melissa A Kacena; Paul Todd; William J Landis
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.416

Review 4.  Mechanisms by which exercise improves bone strength.

Authors:  Charles H Turner; Alexander G Robling
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Mechanically induced intracellular calcium waves in osteoblasts demonstrate calcium fingerprints in bone cell mechanotransduction.

Authors:  Lindsay M Godin; Sakiko Suzuki; Christopher R Jacobs; Henry J Donahue; Seth W Donahue
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2006-11-03

6.  Tanning predicts bone mass but not structure in adolescent females living in Hawaii.

Authors:  Daniel L Osborne; Connie M Weaver; Linda D McAbe; George M McCabe; Rachel Novotny; Carol Boushey; Dennis A Savaiano
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 1.937

7.  Regional bone mineral density in male athletes: a comparison of soccer players, runners and controls.

Authors:  Michael Fredericson; Kelvin Chew; Jessica Ngo; Tammy Cleek; Jenny Kiratli; Kristin Cobb
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Too Fit To Fracture: exercise recommendations for individuals with osteoporosis or osteoporotic vertebral fracture.

Authors:  L M Giangregorio; A Papaioannou; N J Macintyre; M C Ashe; A Heinonen; K Shipp; J Wark; S McGill; H Keller; R Jain; J Laprade; A M Cheung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Nuclear receptors in bone physiology and diseases.

Authors:  Yuuki Imai; Min-Young Youn; Kazuki Inoue; Ichiro Takada; Alexander Kouzmenko; Shigeaki Kato
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 37.312

Review 10.  Muscle and bone plasticity after spinal cord injury: review of adaptations to disuse and to electrical muscle stimulation.

Authors:  Shauna Dudley-Javoroski; Richard K Shields
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.