Literature DB >> 19779686

[Computer-assisted surgery-(CAS-) guided correction arthrodesis of the ankle joint].

Martinus Richter1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Restoration of a stable and plantigrade foot in deformities at the ankle and concomitant degenerative changes at the ankle joint. INDICATIONS: Deformities at the ankle and concomitant degenerative changes at the ankle joint. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Active local infection or relevant vascular insufficiency. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Supine position and anterior approach to the ankle joint. Placement of dynamic reference bases (DRBs) in tibia and talus. Two-dimensional (2-D) image acquisition for navigation. Definition of axes of tibia and talus, and of the extent of correction. Exposition of the ankle joint and removal of remaining cartilage. Computer-assisted surgery-(CAS-) guided correction and transfixation of the corrected position with two 2.5-mm Kirschner wires. Transplantation of autologous cancellous and cortical bone, if necessary. 3-D image acquisition for analysis of the accuracy of the correction and planning of the drillings for the four screws (two parallel from anterolateral, one from posteromedial from the tibia, and one from lateral from the fibula). CAS-guided drilling and insertion of the screws. 3-D image acquisition for analysis of the accuracy of the correction and implant position. Layerwise closure. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Partial weight bearing with 15 kg in an orthosis for 6 weeks, followed by full weight bearing in a stable standard shoe.
RESULTS: From September 1, 2006 to August 31, 2008, 24 correction ankle arthrodeses were performed. The accuracy was assessed by intraoperative 3-D imaging. All achieved angles/ translations were within a maximum deviation of 2 degrees /2 mm when compared to the planned correction. Complications that were associated with CAS were not observed. In all 20 patients that completed follow-up so far, a timely fusion was registered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19779686     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-009-1807-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Computer-assisted surgical planning. 3-D software for the PC].

Authors:  C Dahlen; H Zwipp
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Computer-assisted posterior instrumentation of the cervical and cervico-thoracic spine.

Authors:  Marcus Richter; Thomas Mattes; Balkan Cakir
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-11-22       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rolf G Haaker; Martin Stockheim; Michael Kamp; Gunnar Proff; Johannes Breitenfelder; Andreas Ottersbach
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes.

Authors:  H B Kitaoka; I J Alexander; R S Adelaar; J A Nunley; M S Myerson; M Sanders
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.827

5.  [Osteotomies of the distal tibia and hindfoot for ankle realignment].

Authors:  B Hintermann; M Knupp; A Barg
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Computer Assisted Surgery (CAS) guided arthrodesis of the foot and ankle: an analysis of accuracy in 100 cases.

Authors:  Martinus Richter; Stefan Zech
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.827

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Computer aided surgery in foot and ankle: applications and perspectives.

Authors:  Martinus Richter
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  [Arthrodesis (with/without correction) of the ankle and subtalar joint: A3 nail fixation with triple bending and mechanical navigation].

Authors:  M Richter
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 1.154

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.