Literature DB >> 23483265

Remodeling characteristics and biomechanical properties of a crosslinked versus a non-crosslinked porcine dermis scaffolds in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair.

J A Cavallo1, S C Greco, J Liu, M M Frisella, C R Deeken, B D Matthews.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the histologic remodeling profile and biomechanical properties of the porcine abdominal wall after repair with HDMI-crosslinked (Permacol(®)) or non-crosslinked (Strattice(®)) porcine dermis in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair.
METHODS: Bilateral incisional hernias were created in Yucatan minipigs and repaired after 21 days. The repair site, including mesh and abdominal wall, was harvested after 1, 6, and 12 months and subjected to histologic analysis and uniaxial testing. Native abdominal wall without mesh was also subjected to uniaxial tensile testing.
RESULTS: Permacol(®) demonstrated significant improvement over time in every remodeling category except scaffold degradation, while remodeling characteristics of Strattice(®) remained relatively unchanged over time for every category except fibrous encapsulation and neovascularization. However, remodeling scores for Strattice(®) were already significantly higher after just 1 month compared to Permacol(®) in the categories of cellular infiltration, ECM deposition, and neovascularization, providing evidence of earlier remodeling of the non-crosslinked grafts compared to the crosslinked grafts. The tensile strength and stiffness of both crosslinked and non-crosslinked graft-tissue composites were greater than the tensile strength and stiffness of the native porcine abdominal wall in the very early post-operative period (1 month), but there was no difference in tensile strength or stiffness by the end of the study period (12 months).
CONCLUSIONS: HDMI collagen crosslinking of porcine dermis scaffolds reduces the early histologic remodeling profile but does not significantly impact the tensile strength or stiffness of the graft-tissue composites in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23483265      PMCID: PMC3883946          DOI: 10.1007/s10029-013-1070-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  15 in total

1.  Effects of crosslinking degree of an acellular biological tissue on its tissue regeneration pattern.

Authors:  Huang-Chien Liang; Yen Chang; Cheng-Kuo Hsu; Meng-Horng Lee; Hsing-Wen Sung
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Extracellular matrix bioscaffolds for orthopaedic applications. A comparative histologic study.

Authors:  Jolene E Valentin; John S Badylak; George P McCabe; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  The extracellular matrix as a biologic scaffold material.

Authors:  Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 4.  Extracellular matrix as a biological scaffold material: Structure and function.

Authors:  Stephen F Badylak; Donald O Freytes; Thomas W Gilbert
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  Bacterial clearance of biologic grafts used in hernia repair: an experimental study.

Authors:  K C Harth; A-M Broome; M R Jacobs; J A Blatnik; F Zeinali; S Bajaksouzian; M J Rosen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Abnormal collagen I to III distribution in the skin of patients with incisional hernia.

Authors:  U Klinge; Z Y Si; H Zheng; V Schumpelick; R S Bhardwaj; B Klosterhalfen
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.745

7.  Use of human acellular dermal matrix in complex and contaminated abdominal wall reconstructions.

Authors:  Joe H Patton; Stepheny Berry; Kurt A Kralovich
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Acellular dermal matrix in the management of high-risk abdominal wall defects.

Authors:  Hyong Kim; Kevin Bruen; Daniel Vargo
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 9.  Xenogeneic extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction.

Authors:  Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Transpl Immunol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.708

10.  Use of human acellular dermal matrix for abdominal wall reconstructions.

Authors:  Samuel M Maurice; Dionne A Skeete
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Surgical mesh for ventral incisional hernia repairs: Understanding mesh design.

Authors:  Ali Rastegarpour; Michael Cheung; Madhurima Vardhan; Mohamed M Ibrahim; Charles E Butler; Howard Levinson
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 0.947

2.  Combined in vivo and ex vivo analysis of mesh mechanics in a porcine hernia model.

Authors:  Lindsey G Kahan; Spencer P Lake; Jared M McAllister; Wen Hui Tan; Jennifer Yu; Dominic Thompson; L Michael Brunt; Jeffrey A Blatnik
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

3.   Extracellular Matrix-Based Biomaterials and Their Influence Upon Cell Behavior.

Authors:  Madeline C Cramer; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Abdominal wall reinforcement: biologic vs. degradable synthetic devices.

Authors:  S Gruber-Blum; J Brand; C Keibl; R H Fortelny; H Redl; F Mayer; A H Petter-Puchner
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 5.  Extracellular matrix bioscaffolds in tissue remodeling and morphogenesis.

Authors:  Ilea T Swinehart; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.780

6.  Burst inflation test for measuring biomechanical properties of rat abdominal walls.

Authors:  V D Mahalingam; B C Syverud; A M Myers; K W VanDusen; L M Larkin; W M Kuzon; E M Arruda
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Remodeling Characteristics and Collagen Distributions of Biologic Scaffold Materials Biopsied From Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Sites.

Authors:  Jaime A Cavallo; Noopur Gangopadhyay; Jason Dudas; Andres A Roma; Mateusz S Jasielec; Jack Baty; Sara Baalman; Margaret M Frisella; Marissa M Tenenbaum; Terence M Myckatyn; Brent D Matthews; Corey R Deeken
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.539

8.  Histologic, Molecular, and Clinical Evaluation of Explanted Breast Prostheses, Capsules, and Acellular Dermal Matrices for Bacteria.

Authors:  Louis Poppler; Justin Cohen; Utku Can Dolen; Andrew E Schriefer; Marissa M Tenenbaum; Corey Deeken; Richard A Chole; Terence M Myckatyn
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.283

9.  Extracellular matrix regenerative graft attenuates the negative impact of polypropylene prolapse mesh on vagina in rhesus macaque.

Authors:  Rui Liang; Katrina Knight; William Barone; Robert W Powers; Alexis Nolfi; Stacy Palcsey; Steven Abramowitch; Pamela A Moalli
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 10.  Porcine dermis implants in soft-tissue reconstruction: current status.

Authors:  Neil J Smart; Nicholas Bryan; John A Hunt; Ian R Daniels
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2014-03-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.