Literature DB >> 19777295

Residents' yard choices and rationales in a desert city: social priorities, ecological impacts, and decision tradeoffs.

Kelli L Larson1, David Casagrande, Sharon L Harlan, Scott T Yabiku.   

Abstract

As a dominant land use in urban ecosystems, residential yards impact water and other environmental resources. Converting thirsty lawns into alternative landscapes is one approach to water conservation, yet barriers such as cultural norms reinforce the traditional lawn. Meanwhile, the complex social and ecological implications of yard choices complicate programs aimed at changing grass and other yard features for particular purposes. In order to better understand individual landscape decisions, we qualitatively examined residents' rationales for their preferred yard types in the desert metropolis of Phoenix, Arizona. After briefly presenting landscape choices across two survey samples, the dominant reasons for preferences are discussed: appearance, maintenance, environment, recreation, microclimate, familiarity, and health/safety. Three broader analytical themes emerged from these descriptive codes: (1) residents' desires for attractive, comfortable landscapes of leisure encompassing pluralistic tastes, lifestyles, and perceptions; (2) the association of environmental benefits and impacts with different landscape types involving complex social and ecological tradeoffs; and (3) the cultural legacies evident in modern landscape choices, especially in terms of a dichotomous human-nature worldview among long-time residents of the Phoenix oasis. Given these findings, programs aimed at landscape change must recognize diverse preferences and rationalization processes, along with the perceived versus actual impacts and tradeoffs of varying yard alternatives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19777295     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-009-9353-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  5 in total

1.  Mapping and modeling the biogeochemical cycling of turf grasses in the United States.

Authors:  Cristina Milesi; Steven W Running; Christopher D Elvidge; John B Dietz; Benjamin T Tuttle; Ramakrishna R Nemani
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Modeling residential lawn fertilization practices: integrating high resolution remote sensing with socioeconomic data.

Authors:  Weiqi Zhou; Austin Troy; Morgan Grove
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Neighborhood microclimates and vulnerability to heat stress.

Authors:  Sharon L Harlan; Anthony J Brazel; Lela Prashad; William L Stefanov; Larissa Larsen
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity.

Authors:  Diane Hope; Corinna Gries; Weixing Zhu; William F Fagan; Charles L Redman; Nancy B Grimm; Amy L Nelson; Chris Martin; Ann Kinzig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Nitrogen retention in urban lawns and forests.

Authors:  S M Raciti; P M Groffman; T J Fahey
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.657

  5 in total
  10 in total

1.  Homeowner attitudes and practices towards residential landscape management in Ohio, USA.

Authors:  Thomas W Blaine; Susan Clayton; Paul Robbins; Parwinder S Grewal
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Valuing the benefits of creek rehabilitation: building a business case for public investments in urban green infrastructure.

Authors:  Gayathri Devi Mekala; Roger N Jones; Darla Hatton MacDonald
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Residential Knowledge of Native Tree Species: A Case Study of Residents in Four Southern Ontario Municipalities.

Authors:  Andrew D Almas; Tenley M Conway
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Exploring homeowner diffusion of yard care knowledge as one step toward improving urban ecosystems.

Authors:  Nicholas F Martini; Kristen C Nelson; Maria E Dahmus
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Balancing the Ecological Function of Residential Stormwater Ponds with Homeowner Landscaping Practices.

Authors:  Paul Monaghan; Shangchun Hu; Gail Hansen; Emily Ott; Charles Nealis; Maria Morera
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Advancing methods for research on household water insecurity: Studying entitlements and capabilities, socio-cultural dynamics, and political processes, institutions and governance.

Authors:  Amber Wutich; Jessica Budds; Laura Eichelberger; Jo Geere; Leila Harris; Jennifer Horney; Wendy Jepson; Emma Norman; Kathleen O'Reilly; Amber Pearson; Sameer Shah; Jamie Shinn; Karen Simpson; Chad Staddon; Justin Stoler; Manuel P Teodoro; Sera Young
Journal:  Water Secur       Date:  2017-11-16

7.  Classifying Residents who use Landscape Irrigation: Implications for Encouraging Water Conservation Behavior.

Authors:  Laura A Warner; Alexa J Lamm; Joy N Rumble; Emmett T Martin; Randall Cantrell
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Residential household yard care practices along urban-exurban gradients in six climatically-diverse U.S. metropolitan areas.

Authors:  Dexter H Locke; Colin Polsky; J Morgan Grove; Peter M Groffman; Kristen C Nelson; Kelli L Larson; Jeannine Cavender-Bares; James B Heffernan; Rinku Roy Chowdhury; Sarah E Hobbie; Neil D Bettez; Sharon J Hall; Christopher Neill; Laura Ogden; Jarlath O'Neil-Dunne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Vegetation communities on commercial developments are heterogenous and determined by development and landscaping decisions, not socioeconomics.

Authors:  Karen Dyson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 3.752

10.  The role of cultural norms in shaping attitudes towards amphibians in Cape Town, South Africa.

Authors:  Peta Brom; Pippin Anderson; Alan Channing; Leslie G Underhill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.