Literature DB >> 22638651

Homeowner attitudes and practices towards residential landscape management in Ohio, USA.

Thomas W Blaine1, Susan Clayton, Paul Robbins, Parwinder S Grewal.   

Abstract

This study describes the results of a survey of 432 homeowners in Ohio, USA concerning their perceptions and practices regarding management of residential landscapes. The results reveal that outdoor residential environments are extremely important to homeowners, who tend to view their yards as serving multiple functions: a place to observe nature and to socialize as well as a place of beauty and recreation. Use of a lawn care company to apply chemicals is reported by 22 % of respondents, while 40 % either apply chemicals themselves or have someone other than a lawn care company do it. Logistic regressions reveal that factors influencing a homeowner's decision to employ a lawn care company or to apply chemicals themselves include: household income (+), perceived impacts on the environment (-), whether the next door neighbor does it (+), and type of residential environment (rural -, suburban and urban +). A theme that emerges throughout the study is the perceived importance of the role of the lawn in residents' sense of social status or acceptance in the neighborhood. This perception can be viewed as a positive in ensuring that residential environments are well maintained, but also as a negative resulting in environmental degradation or presenting a barrier to creativity in the development of alternative residential environments. Specific policy implications of these findings are that efforts aimed at educating homeowners about the environmental impacts of their lawn care choices are likely to have more success if they are directed at neighborhood groups rather than individuals, show that alternatives are easy to adopt, affordable, and can produce the characteristics of lawns that homeowners seek.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22638651     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-012-9874-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  6 in total

1.  Mapping and modeling the biogeochemical cycling of turf grasses in the United States.

Authors:  Cristina Milesi; Steven W Running; Christopher D Elvidge; John B Dietz; Benjamin T Tuttle; Ramakrishna R Nemani
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Modeling residential lawn fertilization practices: integrating high resolution remote sensing with socioeconomic data.

Authors:  Weiqi Zhou; Austin Troy; Morgan Grove
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Residents' yard choices and rationales in a desert city: social priorities, ecological impacts, and decision tradeoffs.

Authors:  Kelli L Larson; David Casagrande; Sharon L Harlan; Scott T Yabiku
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Evaluation of methods for monitoring the potential exposure of small children to pesticides in the residential environment.

Authors:  R G Lewis; R C Fortmann; D E Camann
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Municipal bylaw to reduce cosmetic/non-essential pesticide use on household lawns - a policy implementation evaluation.

Authors:  Donald C Cole; Loren Vanderlinden; Jessica Leah; Rich Whate; Carol Mee; Monica Bienefeld; Susitha Wanigaratne; Monica Campbell
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 5.984

6.  A modeling framework for estimating children's residential exposure and dose to chlorpyrifos via dermal residue contact and nondietary ingestion.

Authors:  V G Zartarian; H Ozkaynak; J M Burke; M J Zufall; M L Rigas; E J Furtaw
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Conservation biological control and pest performance in lawn turf: does mowing height matter?

Authors:  Emily K Dobbs; Daniel A Potter
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Classifying Residents who use Landscape Irrigation: Implications for Encouraging Water Conservation Behavior.

Authors:  Laura A Warner; Alexa J Lamm; Joy N Rumble; Emmett T Martin; Randall Cantrell
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Impacts of a neonicotinoid, neonicotinoid-pyrethroid premix, and anthranilic diamide insecticide on four species of turf-inhabiting beneficial insects.

Authors:  Jonathan L Larson; Carl T Redmond; Daniel A Potter
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Assessing insecticide hazard to bumble bees foraging on flowering weeds in treated lawns.

Authors:  Jonathan L Larson; Carl T Redmond; Daniel A Potter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Public preferences for ecosystem services on exurban landscapes: A case study from the Mid-Atlantic, USA.

Authors:  Joshua M Duke; Jules Bruck; Susan Barton; Megan Murray; Shreeram Inamdar; Douglas W Tallamy
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2016-07-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.