Literature DB >> 25228090

Exploring homeowner diffusion of yard care knowledge as one step toward improving urban ecosystems.

Nicholas F Martini1, Kristen C Nelson, Maria E Dahmus.   

Abstract

Urban ecosystems are increasingly influenced by residential yard care decisions. This had led researchers to focus on homeowner education programs when it comes to yard care. Typically, the success of programs designed to influence yard care is based on whether the target subject changes his or her behavior in a more environmentally conscious manner. This threshold, however, fails to consider if individuals share this information with their friends and neighbors, thus having a possible spillover effect. In this paper, we focus on the transmission of new lawn management information among neighbors and consider (1) if individuals discuss information they learned in a short-term educational program, (2) what factors are associated with diffusion, (3) what information individuals share, and (4) what barriers to transmission exist. In the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area, we used data from a mailed survey, group discussions, and mailed information exchanges. Results indicate that best management practices for yards can diffuse through the neighborhood (approximately 34 % shared information with their neighbors in a one-month period). In addition, factors such as (1) attending a group discussion, 2) individual social connectedness, (3) length of home ownership, and (4) the presence of children in the household were found to be positively related to increased sharing of information. Also, for lawns, the content of information shared tended to be about increasing grass height and reducing fertilizer applications. Finally, we find barriers to sharing ideas based on spatial, temporal, or perception factors but overcoming some of these barriers is possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25228090     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-014-0368-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  4 in total

1.  Mapping and modeling the biogeochemical cycling of turf grasses in the United States.

Authors:  Cristina Milesi; Steven W Running; Christopher D Elvidge; John B Dietz; Benjamin T Tuttle; Ramakrishna R Nemani
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Development and analysis of a community-based resource recovery program.

Authors:  H E Jacobs; J S Bailey; J I Crews
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1984

Review 3.  Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments.

Authors:  Mark A Goddard; Andrew J Dougill; Tim G Benton
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Residents' yard choices and rationales in a desert city: social priorities, ecological impacts, and decision tradeoffs.

Authors:  Kelli L Larson; David Casagrande; Sharon L Harlan; Scott T Yabiku
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.266

  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  Contrasting nitrogen and phosphorus budgets in urban watersheds and implications for managing urban water pollution.

Authors:  Sarah E Hobbie; Jacques C Finlay; Benjamin D Janke; Daniel A Nidzgorski; Dylan B Millet; Lawrence A Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Classifying Residents who use Landscape Irrigation: Implications for Encouraging Water Conservation Behavior.

Authors:  Laura A Warner; Alexa J Lamm; Joy N Rumble; Emmett T Martin; Randall Cantrell
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Regional infectious risk prediction of COVID-19 based on geo-spatial data.

Authors:  Xuewei Cheng; Zhaozhou Han; Badamasi Abba; Hong Wang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 2.984

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.