Literature DB >> 19771185

Clinimetrics Corner: The Minimal Clinically Important Change Score (MCID): A Necessary Pretense.

Chad E Cook1.   

Abstract

Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) are patient derived scores that reflect changes in a clinical intervention that are meaningful for the patient. At present, there are a number of different methods to obtain an MCID, as there a number of different factors that can influence the MCID value. This clinimetric corner outlines the hidden challenges associated with identifying a viable MCID and possible suggestions to improve the future development of these single scores.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Global rating of change; Minimal clinically important difference; Outcomes measures

Year:  2008        PMID： 19771185      PMCID： PMC2716157          DOI： 10.1179/jmt.2008.16.4.82E

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Man Manip Ther        ISSN： 1066-9817


  14 in total

1.  The concept of clinically meaningful difference in health-related quality-of-life research. How meaningful is it?

Authors:  R D Hays; J M Woolley
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods.

Authors:  Anne G Copay; Brian R Subach; Steven D Glassman; David W Polly; Thomas C Schuler
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: the lesson of Cronbach.

Authors:  G R Norman; P Stratford; G Regehr
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Patients' expectations and satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  C A Mancuso; E A Salvati; N A Johanson; M G Peterson; M E Charlson
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Determining minimally important changes in generic and disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaires in clinical trials of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M Kosinski; S Z Zhao; S Dedhiya; J T Osterhaus; J E Ware
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2000-07

6.  The relation between the minimally important difference and patient benefit.

Authors:  Geoffrey R Norman
Journal:  COPD       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.409

Review 7.  Minimal clinically important difference, clinical perspective: an opinion.

Authors:  Stephen I Rennard
Journal:  COPD       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.409

Review 8.  Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures.

Authors:  Gordon H Guyatt; David Osoba; Albert W Wu; Kathleen W Wyrwich; Geoffrey R Norman
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Interpreting clinically significant changes in patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Jolie Ringash; Brian O'Sullivan; Andrea Bezjak; Donald A Redelmeier
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients.

Authors:  Henrik H Lauridsen; Jan Hartvigsen; Claus Manniche; Lars Korsholm; Niels Grunnet-Nilsson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 2.362
View more
  66 in total

1.  Relationship among chelator adherence, change in chelators, and quality of life in thalassemia.

Authors:  Felicia L Trachtenberg; Eric Gerstenberger; Yan Xu; Lauren Mednick; Amy Sobota; Hannah Ware; Alexis A Thompson; Ellis J Neufeld; Robert Yamashita
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Statistics In Brief: Minimum Clinically Important Difference-Availability of Reliable Estimates.

Authors:  Mitchell Maltenfort; Claudio Díaz-Ledezma
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Outcomes assessment in wrist surgery.

Authors:  David J Slutsky
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2013-02

4.  Minimal clinically important differences and substantial clinical benefits for Knee Society Scores.

Authors:  Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla; Santiago Gonzalez-Parreño; Daniel Martinez-Mendez; Francisco A Miralles-Muñoz; Fernando A Lopez-Prats
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Transducer-based evaluation of tremor.

Authors:  Dietrich Haubenberger; Giovanni Abbruzzese; Peter G Bain; Nin Bajaj; Julián Benito-León; Kailash P Bhatia; Günther Deuschl; Maria João Forjaz; Mark Hallett; Elan D Louis; Kelly E Lyons; Tiago A Mestre; Jan Raethjen; Maria Stamelou; Eng-King Tan; Claudia M Testa; Rodger J Elble
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 10.338

Review 6.  Statistical data presentation: a primer for rheumatology researchers.

Authors:  Durga Prasanna Misra; Olena Zimba; Armen Yuri Gasparyan
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.631

7.  Dosimetric and clinical factors predicting quality of life after post prostatectomy radiation therapy: useful tool or not?

Authors:  Christian Carrie; Gabriel Bringeon
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-12

8.  Minimal clinically important differences in the brief pain inventory in patients with bone metastases.

Authors:  Karrie Wong; Liang Zeng; Liying Zhang; Gillian Bedard; Erin Wong; May Tsao; Elizabeth Barnes; Cyril Danjoux; Arjun Sahgal; Lori Holden; Natalie Lauzon; Edward Chow
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  The minimal clinically important difference after simple decompression for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.

Authors:  Sunitha Malay; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 2.230

10.  Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth Rose Mueller; Kimberly Kenton; Jennifer T Anger; Catherine Bresee; Christopher Tarnay
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 4.137
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.