Literature DB >> 19770331

Pitfalls in abdominal diffusion-weighted imaging: how predictive is restricted water diffusion for malignancy.

Sebastian Feuerlein1, Sandra Pauls, Markus S Juchems, Tina Stuber, Martin H K Hoffmann, Hans-Juergen Brambs, Andrea S Ernst.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: As diffusion-weighted imaging is increasingly implemented into routine protocols of abdominal MRI, abnormal findings in expected and unexpected locations become more common. The aim of our retrospective study was to investigate the specificity of restricted diffusion in differentiation of benign from malignant abdominal disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred thirty consecutively registered patients underwent abdominal MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging (single-shot spin-echo echo-planar sequence) with b values of 0, 150, 500, and 1,000 s/mm(2). Lesions were detected by two blinded readers using only the images with a b value of 1,000 s/mm(2), and representative apparent diffusion coefficients were measured. Lymph nodes were not documented.
RESULTS: Fifty-two of the 230 patients had a total of 55 lesions with restricted diffusion (23.9%). The mean apparent diffusion coefficient was 809 mm(2)/s. Forty-three lesions (78.2%) were malignant. The 12 benign lesions were liver hemangioma, liver adenoma, autoimmune pancreatitis, pancreatic teratoma, two abscesses, three cases of inflammatory bowel wall thickening due to Crohn's disease, Bartholin cyst, hemorrhagic ovarian cyst, and renal Rosai-Dorfman disease.
CONCLUSION: Restricted diffusion is generally considered to be associated with malignant tumors because of the high cellularity of these tumors. However, in interpretation of diffusion-weighted images, it should be kept in mind that a number of benign lesions, as many as 22% in our cohort, can exhibit restricted diffusion on images with high b values, thus mimicking malignant lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19770331     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.2093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  20 in total

Review 1.  Added value of diffusion-weighted acquisitions in MRI of the abdomen and pelvis.

Authors:  William A Moore; Gaurav Khatri; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Robert D Sims; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Diffusion weighted imaging in the liver.

Authors:  Petra G Kele; Eric J van der Jagt
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for the differentiation of malignant from benign strictures in the periampullary region.

Authors:  Nam Kyung Lee; Suk Kim; Hyung Il Seo; Dong Uk Kim; Hyun Young Woo; Tae Un Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of biliopancreatic disorders: correlation with conventional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Nam Kyung Lee; Suk Kim; Gwang Ha Kim; Dong Uk Kim; Hyung Il Seo; Tae Un Kim; Dae Hwan Kang; Ho Jin Jang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: usefulness of ADC values in the differential diagnosis of focal lesions and effect of ROI methods on ADC measurements.

Authors:  João Pedro Filipe; Luís Curvo-Semedo; João Casalta-Lopes; Maria Cristina Marques; Filipe Caseiro-Alves
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in gynecologic cancers.

Authors:  Shigenobu Motoshima; Hiroyuki Irie; Takahiko Nakazono; Toshiharu Kamura; Sho Kudo
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 7.  Pitfalls of diffusion-weighted imaging of the female pelvis.

Authors:  Ana Luisa Duarte; João Lopes Dias; Teresa Margarida Cunha
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

8.  Diffusion-weighted MRI in intrahepatic bile duct adenoma arising from the cirrhotic liver.

Authors:  Chansik An; Sumi Park; Yoon Jung Choi
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Correlation of minimum apparent diffusion coefficient with maximum standardized uptake on fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hale Çolakoğlu Er; Ayşe Erden; N Özlem Küçük; Ethem Geçim
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.630

10.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for characterizing musculoskeletal lesions.

Authors:  Ty K Subhawong; Michael A Jacobs; Laura M Fayad
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.