Literature DB >> 19770326

Assessment of breast lesions with diffusion-weighted MRI: comparing the use of different b values.

Fernanda Philadelpho Arantes Pereira1, Gabriela Martins, Eduardo Figueiredo, Marisa Nassar Aidar Domingues, Romeu Cortes Domingues, Lea Mirian Barbosa da Fonseca, Emerson Leandro Gasparetto.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to study the utility of diffusion-weighted MRI in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions by assessing the best b values. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-five women (mean age, 46.1 years) with 52 focal mass breast lesions underwent diffusion-weighted imaging with different b values. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of each lesion was calculated from the ADC maps done using five b values (0, 250, 500, 750, and 1,000 s/mm(2)) and using b values of 0 s/mm(2) with each other b value separately (0 and 250 s/mm(2), 0 and 500 s/mm(2), 0 and 750 s/mm(2), 0 and 1,000 s/mm(2)). The mean ADC values were correlated with imaging findings and histopathologic diagnoses. The cutoff ADC value, sensitivity, and specificity of diffusion-weighted imaging to differentiate benign and malignant lesions were calculated in all b value combinations. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: The mean ADC value was significantly lower for malignant lesions compared to benign lesions (p < 0.0001) in all b value combinations. No statistical difference was seen between the ADC obtained from different b value combinations (p = 0.2581) in the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions. The ADC calculated from b 0 and 750 s/mm(2) was slightly better than the other b value combinations, showing a sensitivity of 92.3% and a specificity of 96.2%.
CONCLUSION: Diffusion-weighted imaging is a potential resource as a coadjutant of MRI in the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions. Such imaging can be performed without a significant increase in examination time, especially because it can be done with lower b values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19770326     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.2522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  46 in total

1.  Diagnostic performance of ADCs in different ROIs for breast lesions.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Guan-Qiao Jin; Jun-Jie Liu; Dan-Ke Su; Ning-Bin Luo; Dong Xie; Shao-Lv Lai; Xiang-Yang Huang; Wei-Li Huang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

2.  Diffusion-weighted MRI in pretreatment prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Raphael Richard; Isabelle Thomassin; Marion Chapellier; Aurélie Scemama; Patricia de Cremoux; Mariana Varna; Sylvie Giacchetti; Marc Espié; Eric de Kerviler; Cedric de Bazelaire
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  The Efficiency of Diffusion Weighted MRI and MR Spectroscopy On Breast MR Imaging.

Authors:  Canan Altay; Pınar Balcı
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2014-10-01

4.  Effects of magnetic field strength and b value on the sensitivity and specificity of quantitative breast diffusion-weighted MRI.

Authors:  Mohammad Eghtedari; Jingfei Ma; Patricia Fox; Inanc Guvenc; Wei T Yang; Basak E Dogan
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-08

5.  Diffusion weighted imaging of the normal breast: reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements and variation with menstrual cycle and menopausal status.

Authors:  Elizabeth A M O'Flynn; Veronica A Morgan; Sharon L Giles; Nandita M deSouza
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Effect of b value and pre-admission of contrast on diagnostic accuracy of 1.5-T breast DWI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Monique D Dorrius; Hildebrand Dijkstra; Matthijs Oudkerk; Paul E Sijens
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  [Diffusion-weighted breast imaging. Clinical implementation procedure].

Authors:  E Wenkel; M Uder; R Janka
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Nonmalignant breast lesions: ADCs of benign and high-risk subtypes assessed as false-positive at dynamic enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Sana Parsian; Habib Rahbar; Kimberly H Allison; Wendy B Demartini; Matthew L Olson; Constance D Lehman; Savannah C Partridge
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions: Region-of-interest placement and different ADC parameters influence apparent diffusion coefficient values.

Authors:  Hubert Bickel; Katja Pinker; Stephan Polanec; Heinrich Magometschnigg; Georg Wengert; Claudio Spick; Wolfgang Bogner; Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath; Thomas H Helbich; Pascal Baltzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging for the separation of benign from malignant BI-RADS 4/5 lesions found on breast MRI at 3T.

Authors:  Dorota J Wisner; Nathan Rogers; Vibhas S Deshpande; David N Newitt; Gerhard A Laub; David A Porter; John Kornak; Bonnie N Joe; Nola M Hylton
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.